Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Schaefergreen2 sentences2006Indeed, Justice Miller, writing separately in Schaefer , emphasized this service requirement *997 and specifically agreed with it: "I agree with the majority that the time period provided by the statute begins to run when the driver submits and properly serves a written request for a hearing, in accordance with our rules regarding service." Schaefer, 154 Ill.2d at 271 , 182 Ill. 2006Indeed, Justice Miller, writing separately in Schaefer , emphasized this service requirement *997 and specifically agreed with it: "I agree with the majority that the time period provided by the statute begins to run when the driver submits and properly serves a written request for a hearing, in accordance with our rules regarding service." Schaefer, 154 Ill.2d at 271 , 182 Ill. | 2 | 4 |
Hearne v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees of the Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2017Thus, on May 25, 2016, the Board entered a resolution dismissing Weaver based on its finding that the dismissal charges of April 1, 2016, were “true and correct.” Following this resolution, there was no further opportunity for review with the agency. 105 ILCS 5/34-85(a)(7) (West 2014); see also Hearne v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees of the Board of Education for the City of Chicago, 322 Ill. 2017Thus, on May 25, 2016, the Board entered a resolution dismissing Weaver based on its finding that the dismissal charges of April 1, 2016, were “true and correct.” Following this resolution, there was no further opportunity for review with the agency. 105 ILCS 5/34-85(a)(7) (West 2014); see also Hearne v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees of the Board of Education for the City of Chicago, 322 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Marble Emporium, Inc. v. Vuksanovicgreen1 sentence2026See id. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Pitullagreen1 sentence2021App. 3d 461, 468 (1995) (evidentiary hearing appropriate where documents submitted in support of fee petition were vague in that they only included a total number of hours worked by an individual on a particular day with a general description of the tasks performed and did not detail the nature of the work performed, how they related to the litigation, and whether they were necessary); In re Marriage of Pitulla, 141 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Lasday Ex Rel. Larsid Inc. v. Weinergreen1 sentence2021App. 3d 941, 953 (1999) (concluding that an evidentiary hearing was necessary where the defendants “presented detailed objections to the fee petition and a written request for a hearing” and noting that when the objecting party requests a hearing, he is entitled to one); Lasday v. Weiner, 273 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Smithgreen1 sentence2006Three years later, in People v. Smith, this court reiterated the point by holding that the “hearing on a petition to rescind must be held within 30 days of the date of filing the petition in the circuit court with venue, with service on the State.” People v. Smith, 172 Ill. 2d 289, 295 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Esposito
green
2 sentences1994People v. Esposito (1988), 121 Ill. 2d 491 , 521 N.E.2d 873 . 1994People v. Esposito (1988), 121 Ill. 2d 491 , 521 N.E.2d 873 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
People v. Puckett
green
1 sentence1992Puckett, 221 Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
In Re Estate of Marsh
neutral
1 sentence1976App. 2d 101 , 175 N.E.2d 633 .) Plaintiff has not shown any prejudice by defendant’s failure N.E.2d 633.) Plaintiff has not shown any prejudice by defendant’s failure to file a written request for a hearing. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.