imposition standard (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

imposition standard in Indiana

11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Frappier v. State green
ind · 1983
2 sentences

1990Id.

1990Id.

41988–1990
Cahoon v. Cummings green
ind · 2000
2 sentences

2011Id.

2011Id.

12011–2011
Glazier v. Lee green
michctapp · 1988
1 sentence

1997All of the above-cited cases indicate that the plaintiff’s responsibility for the criminal act is, as the Michigan Court of Appeals stated in Glazier, supra, 429 N.W.2d at 860 , the “controlling consideration” as to the imposition of this bar.

11997–1997
Omni Micro, Inc. v. Hyundai Electronics America green
indctapp · 1991
1 sentence

1993T.R., supra. The "judgment from a sister state which is regular and complete on its face is presumed valid." Omni Micro v. Hyundai Electronics (1991), Ind.App., 571 N.E.2d 598, 600 .

11993–1993
Page v. State green
ind · 1980
2 sentences

1990Page v. State (1980), 274 Ind. 264 , 410 N.E.2d 1304 .

1990Page v. State (1980), 274 Ind. 264 , 410 N.E.2d 1304 .

11990–1990
Bundy v. State neutral
ind · 1981
1 sentence

1983Bundy v. State, (1981) Ind., 427 N.E.2d 1077 .

11983–1983
United States v. Watson green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

1981In that case, the Supreme Court observed that the imposition of a requirement of more than probable cause for warrantless arrests would “encumber criminal prosecutions with endless litigation with respect to the existence of exigent circumstances, whether it was practicable to get a warrant, whether the suspect was about to flee, and the like.” Id. at 423-24 , 96 S.Ct. at 828 , 46 L.Ed.2d at 609 .

1981In that case, the Supreme Court observed that the imposition of a requirement of more than probable cause for warrantless arrests would “encumber criminal prosecutions with endless litigation with respect to the existence of exigent circumstances, whether it was practicable to get a warrant, whether the suspect was about to flee, and the like.” Id. at 423-24 , 96 S.Ct. at 828 , 46 L.Ed.2d at 609 .

11981–1981
Johnnie Reb's Book & Card Shop v. Slaton green
scotus · 1971
1 sentence

1978In dealing with a durational residency requirement similar to the one imposed by I.U., the plaintiff in Starns v. Malkerson (1970), 326 F.Supp. 234 , aff'd mem., 401 U.S. 985 , charged that the waiting period constituted an infringement on the fundamental right to interstate travel and therefore the court was required to apply the compelling state interest test.

11978–1978
Starns v. Malkerson green
mnd · 1970
1 sentence

1978In dealing with a durational residency requirement similar to the one imposed by I.U., the plaintiff in Starns v. Malkerson (1970), 326 F.Supp. 234 , aff'd mem., 401 U.S. 985 , charged that the waiting period constituted an infringement on the fundamental right to interstate travel and therefore the court was required to apply the compelling state interest test.

11978–1978
Finch v. State green
ind · 1975
2 sentences

1976Graham v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 330 , 303 N.E.2d 274 ; Finch v. State, (1975) 264 Ind. 48 , 338 N.E.2d 629 .

1976Graham v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 330 , 303 N.E.2d 274 ; Finch v. State, (1975) 264 Ind. 48 , 338 N.E.2d 629 .

11976–1976
Graham v. State neutral
ind · 1973
2 sentences

1976Graham v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 330 , 303 N.E.2d 274 ; Finch v. State, (1975) 264 Ind. 48 , 338 N.E.2d 629 .

1976Graham v. State, (1973) 261 Ind. 330 , 303 N.E.2d 274 ; Finch v. State, (1975) 264 Ind. 48 , 338 N.E.2d 629 .

11976–1976

Where else courts name it

PA 47 (1938–2024) VA 40 (1955–2025) CA 33 (1936–2024) NY 24 (1956–2020) WA 23 (1939–2023) UT 13 (2006–2024) IN 11 (1976–2011) FL 10 (1974–2011) NJ 10 (1965–2021) CO 9 (1978–2024) OR 9 (1975–2017) TN 9 (1925–2024) LA 9 (1941–2020) MA 7 (1975–2022) TX 7 (1999–2024) AZ 6 (1960–2015) GA 6 (1975–2020) AL 6 (1914–2006) NM 5 (1927–2023) MT 5 (2012–2026) NC 5 (2010–2022) MI 5 (1980–2016) MN 4 (1978–2016) IL 4 (1981–2016) MS 4 (1905–2013) OH 4 (1988–2025) CT 4 (1971–2006) WV 3 (1965–2003) MO 3 (1985–1986) ND 3 (1958–1981) MD 3 (1949–1991) ID 3 (1982–1993) WI 3 (1994–2016) OK 3 (2004–2006) SC 2 (2018–2018) WY 2 (2014–2014) IA 2 (1998–2012) NE 2 (1979–2017) DC 2 (1994–2014) HI 2 (1974–2016) KS 2 (2017–2017) NH 2 (2009–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check