Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Whitegreen2 sentences2013See also State v. White, 2008 MT 464, ¶ 20 , 348 Mont. 196 , 199 P.3d 274 (overruled on other grounds) (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘White may not, within the context of the [2007] revocation proceeding, challenge the legality of the conditions imposed on her 1997 suspended sentence, as such a challenge is untimely.”); In re M.W., 2012 MT 44, ¶ 12 , 364 Mont. 211 , 272 P.3d 112 (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘M.W. did not appeal from the order imposing the registration requirement entered by the Youth Court in July 2009.... the challenge he now attempts to make to the original imposition of the requirem 2013See also State v. White, 2008 MT 464, ¶ 20 , 348 Mont. 196 , 199 P.3d 274 (overruled on other grounds) (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘White may not, within the context of the [2007] revocation proceeding, challenge the legality of the conditions imposed on her 1997 suspended sentence, as such a challenge is untimely.”); In re M.W., 2012 MT 44, ¶ 12 , 364 Mont. 211 , 272 P.3d 112 (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘M.W. did not appeal from the order imposing the registration requirement entered by the Youth Court in July 2009.... the challenge he now attempts to make to the original imposition of the requirem | 2 | 2 |
State v. Muhammadgreen2 sentences2012See State v. Muhammad, 2002 MT 47, ¶ 22 , 309 Mont. 1 , 43 P.3d 318 (citation omitted) (‘Muhammad first filed his notice of appeal on July 26, 2000, more than one year after the imposition of the banishment condition in the May 28, 1999, Order. 2012See State v. Muhammad, 2002 MT 47, ¶ 22 , 309 Mont. 1 , 43 P.3d 318 (citation omitted) (‘Muhammad first filed his notice of appeal on July 26, 2000, more than one year after the imposition of the banishment condition in the May 28, 1999, Order. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Adamsgreen2 sentences2026Essentially, Torres seeks a second chance to appeal and raise issues he failed to raise when he did not appeal from his conviction.”); see also State v. White, 2008 MT 464, ¶ 20 , 348 Mont. 196 , 199 P.3d 274 , and State v. Adams, 2013 MT 189, ¶ 17 , 371 Mont. 28 , 305 P.3d 808 . 2026Essentially, Torres seeks a second chance to appeal and raise issues he failed to raise when he did not appeal from his conviction.”); see also State v. White, 2008 MT 464, ¶ 20 , 348 Mont. 196 , 199 P.3d 274 , and State v. Adams, 2013 MT 189, ¶ 17 , 371 Mont. 28 , 305 P.3d 808 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Stephen Thomas Warrengreen1 sentence2017As recognized by the federal courts, “a supervised release revocation proceeding is not the proper forum for a collateral attack on the conviction or sentence that resulted in the term of supervised release.” United States v. Warren, 335 F.3d 76, 77 (2nd Cir. 2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. F. Torres
green
2 sentences2026App. P. 4(5)), M.W. had 60 days to appeal, but that time has long passed, and the challenge he now attempts to make to the original imposition of the requirement has been forfeited.”); State v. Torres, 2017 MT 177, ¶ 10 , 388 Mont. 161 , 398 P.3d 279 (“Torres’ argument that a revocation proceeding ‘is as good a venue as 16 any to allege illegality of an imposed sentence for the underlying offense,’ runs counter to longstanding precedent . . . . 2026App. P. 4(5)), M.W. had 60 days to appeal, but that time has long passed, and the challenge he now attempts to make to the original imposition of the requirement has been forfeited.”); State v. Torres, 2017 MT 177, ¶ 10 , 388 Mont. 161 , 398 P.3d 279 (“Torres’ argument that a revocation proceeding ‘is as good a venue as 16 any to allege illegality of an imposed sentence for the underlying offense,’ runs counter to longstanding precedent . . . . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
In re M.W.
green
1 sentence2013See also State v. White, 2008 MT 464, ¶ 20 , 348 Mont. 196 , 199 P.3d 274 (overruled on other grounds) (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘White may not, within the context of the [2007] revocation proceeding, challenge the legality of the conditions imposed on her 1997 suspended sentence, as such a challenge is untimely.”); In re M.W., 2012 MT 44, ¶ 12 , 364 Mont. 211 , 272 P.3d 112 (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘M.W. did not appeal from the order imposing the registration requirement entered by the Youth Court in July 2009.... the challenge he now attempts to make to the original imposition of the requirem | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In Re Mw
green
2 sentences2013See also State v. White, 2008 MT 464, ¶ 20 , 348 Mont. 196 , 199 P.3d 274 (overruled on other grounds) (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘White may not, within the context of the [2007] revocation proceeding, challenge the legality of the conditions imposed on her 1997 suspended sentence, as such a challenge is untimely.”); In re M.W., 2012 MT 44, ¶ 12 , 364 Mont. 211 , 272 P.3d 112 (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘M.W. did not appeal from the order imposing the registration requirement entered by the Youth Court in July 2009.... the challenge he now attempts to make to the original imposition of the requirem 2013See also State v. White, 2008 MT 464, ¶ 20 , 348 Mont. 196 , 199 P.3d 274 (overruled on other grounds) (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘White may not, within the context of the [2007] revocation proceeding, challenge the legality of the conditions imposed on her 1997 suspended sentence, as such a challenge is untimely.”); In re M.W., 2012 MT 44, ¶ 12 , 364 Mont. 211 , 272 P.3d 112 (citing Muhammad , ¶ 22, ‘M.W. did not appeal from the order imposing the registration requirement entered by the Youth Court in July 2009.... the challenge he now attempts to make to the original imposition of the requirem | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.