acceptable defense in Louisiana

1975Civil Code Article 3079" "As pointed out in the Tooke case, ( Tooke v. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Co., La.App., 122 So.2d 109 ), supra, the failure to read a release is neither an acceptable defense nor a reasonable excuse." There was no error in the conclusion of the trial court that the release was validly obtained and is binding.

1962Tooke v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., 122 So.2d 109 , and Blades v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., 95 So.2d 209 .

2021App. 2 Cir. 4/5/17), 217 So. 3d 596 . 7 The record reflects that the trial court found that the defendant’s conduct and actions toward the juvenile victims fell far below an acceptable standard of behavior and that the defendant used his position of authority to sexually grope his minor students, who were members of his church and school community.

2016Many years ago we recognized in Berry, 835 So.2d at 615 , that “since the public puts its trust in the poliee department as a guardian of its safety, it is essential the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.” One of the primary missions of the LSP is law enforcement.

2015Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company, 14- 1964 (La. 12/8/14), 153 So. 3d 431 .

2015Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company, 14-1964 (La.12/8/14), 153 So.3d 431 .

2000In LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), 714 So.2d 1226 , "we save[d] for another day the question of whether the medical malpractice victim gets any period of time that remains unused at the time of the filing of the request for the medical review panel when the ninety-day period of suspension after the decision of the medical review panel is completed." LeBreton, 714 So.2d 1229 n. 5 .

1994The standard of appellate review of a decision by an administrative agency such as the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners was summarized by this court in Montalbano, supra, as follows: “The scope of appellate review of action taken by an administrative agency is limited to a determination of whether the decision was unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious or amounted to an abuse of discretion.

1991Thigpen v. Guarisco, 197 So.2d 904, 906 (La.App. 1st Cir.1967); Smith, supra .

1990Murphy v. Hoffpauir, 540 So.2d 573 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1989), writ denied, 544 So.2d 406 .

1990Murphy v. Hoffpauir, 540 So.2d 573 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1989), writ denied, 544 So.2d 406 .

1987Cf. Sams v. Kendall Const. Co., 499 So.2d 370 (La.App. 4th Cir.1986).

1962Tooke v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., 122 So.2d 109 , and Blades v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., 95 So.2d 209 .