Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
RH v. Stategreen2 sentences2020R.H. v. State, 937 N.E.2d 386, 388 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). [18] P.K. was offered the opportunity to conform his behavior to an acceptable standard and his behavior over the course of probation – despite being offered services including cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, and motivational interviewing – demonstrated that he was unable to progress in reforming or maintain progress for even a relatively short period of time. 2019R.H. v. State, 937 N.E.2d 386, 388 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). [11] J.J. was offered the opportunity to conform his behavior to an acceptable standard while on probation and was unable to do so for even a relatively short period of time. | 2 | 2 |
Coleman v. Stategreen1 sentence2020Allegations that counsel “failed to investigate issues and interview witnesses do not amount to ineffective assistance absent a showing of what additional information may have been garnered from further consultation or investigation and how that additional information would have aided in the preparation of the case.” Coleman v. State, 694 N.E.2d 269, 274 (Ind. 1998) (citing Brown v. State, 691 N.E.2d 438 , 446–47 (Ind. 1998)). [28] Carr asserts that his collective counsel should have interviewed French in order to obtain her post-conviction testimony that Carr did not believe the gun was in wo | 1 | 1 |
Nordstrom v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See Nordstrom v. State, 627 N.E.2d 1380, 1383 (Ind.Ct.App.1994) (determining that even if Nordstrom genuinely believed that his gun would not fire without a clip inserted, it was inherently reckless for him to point the gun at his wife and pull the trigger under any circumstances, so his belief did not negate the culpability for reckless homicide), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pesch v. Gretter
neutral
2 sentences1968See also: Pesch v. Gretter et al (1940), 216 Ind. 396 , 24 N. E. 2d 923 . 1968See also: Pesch v. Gretter et al (1940), 216 Ind. 396 , 24 N. E. 2d 923 . | 2 | 1968–1968 |
Berry v. State Bank of Otterbein
green
2 sentences1968The acceptable standard for consideration of a motion for finding appears to be similar to that of a motion for directed verdict: “. . . such a motion (for finding and judgment) is in purpose similar to a motion for a directed verdict in a case of trial by jury.” Berry v. State Bank of Otterbein (1935), 99 Ind. App. 655 , 193 N. E. 922 . 1968The acceptable standard for consideration of a motion for finding appears to be similar to that of a motion for directed verdict: “. . . such a motion (for finding and judgment) is in purpose similar to a motion for a directed verdict in a case of trial by jury.” Berry v. State Bank of Otterbein (1935), 99 Ind. App. 655 , 193 N. E. 922 . | 2 | 1968–1968 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence2020Allegations that counsel “failed to investigate issues and interview witnesses do not amount to ineffective assistance absent a showing of what additional information may have been garnered from further consultation or investigation and how that additional information would have aided in the preparation of the case.” Coleman v. State, 694 N.E.2d 269, 274 (Ind. 1998) (citing Brown v. State, 691 N.E.2d 438 , 446–47 (Ind. 1998)). [28] Carr asserts that his collective counsel should have interviewed French in order to obtain her post-conviction testimony that Carr did not believe the gun was in wo | 1 | 2020–2020 |
KS v. State
green
1 sentence2018K.S. , 849 N.E.2d at 544 . [19] K.S. was offered the opportunity to conform his behavior to an acceptable standard while on probation and was unable to do so for even the shortest period of time. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Kopec v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc.
green
2 sentences1991Initially, we note that the circumstances here are different from those in Kopec v. Memorial Hosp. (1990) Ind.App., 557 N.E.2d 1367 since here the qualifications of Dr. Schroeder were challenged at the summary judgment. 1991Initially, we note that the circumstances here are different from those in Kopec v. Memorial Hosp. (1990) Ind. App., 557 N.E.2d 1367 since here the qualifications of Dr. Schroeder were challenged at the summary judgment. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Pirtle v. State
green
2 sentences1986In dealing with the issue of relevance in Pirtle v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 16 , 323 N.E.2d 634, 643 , we quoted authority on the subject. "[The most acceptable test of relevance is the question, does the evidence offered render the desired inference more probable than it would be without the evidence? 1986In dealing with the issue of relevance in Pirtle v. State (1975), 263 Ind. 16 , 323 N.E.2d 634, 643 , we quoted authority on the subject. "[The most acceptable test of relevance is the question, does the evidence offered render the desired inference more probable than it would be without the evidence? | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Campbell v. City of Mishawaka
green
2 sentences1984Campbell v. City of Mishawaka (1981), Ind.App., 422 N.E.2d 334 . 1984Campbell v. City of Mishawaka (1981), Ind. App., 422 N.E.2d 334 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.