concluding clause (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

concluding clause in Louisiana

11 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1927–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Brown v. News-World Publishing Corp.green
lactapp · 1971 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1973–1973
1 sentence

1973See, also, Brown v. News-World Publishing Corp., 245 So.2d 430 (La.App.2nd Cir. 1971) The persons among whom a trial memorandum is intended to circulate are the attorneys for the litigants, the trial judge, the court stenographers, and perhaps the court attaches such as law clerks.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Cordeviolle v. Redon green
la · 1849
2 sentences

1983Cordeviolle v. Redon, 4 La.Ann. 40 ; Henderson v. A. Meyers & Bro., 45 La.Ann. 791 , 13 So. 191 .

1968Cordeviolle v. Redon, 4 La.Ann. 40 ; Henderson v. A. Meyers & Bro., 45 La.

41960–1983
Henderson v. A. Meyers & Bro. neutral
la · 1893
2 sentences

1983Cordeviolle v. Redon, 4 La.Ann. 40 ; Henderson v. A. Meyers & Bro., 45 La.Ann. 791 , 13 So. 191 .

1983Cordeviolle v. Redon, 4 La.Ann. 40 ; Henderson v. A. Meyers & Bro., 45 La.Ann. 791 , 13 So. 191 .

41960–1983
Owens v. Oglesby green
lactapp · 1960
2 sentences

1983Orl.1960) 123 So.2d 521 , the court relied on previous Supreme Court cases interpreting the concluding clause of Article 2725, stating: `The Supreme Court in interpreting the concluding clause of the codal article has held that the prohibition to sublease is always construed strictly against the lessee.

1968In Owens v. Oglesby, (La.App.Orl.1960) 123 So.2d 521 , the court relied on previous Supreme Court cases interpreting the concluding clause of Article 2725, stating: “The Supreme Court in interpreting the concluding clause of the codal article has held that the prohibition to sublease is always construed strictly against the lessee.

31963–1983
Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc. green
lactapp · 2016
1 sentence

2021R.S. 13:4533, with the concluding clause “all other costs allowed by the court.” Id.

12021–2021
State v. Jackson green
la · 1977
1 sentence

1978Proof of actual knowledge is sometimes very difficult; and the really innocent accomplice after the fact will be protected by the concluding requirement that the assistance must be rendered `with the intent that he may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment.' Generally speaking, virtually any sort of aid given to a fugitive felon, to hinder his being arrested, tried or punished, will make the person assisting an accessory after the fact—as furnishing a car, food, *690 shelter or money to help him escape or elude the lawful authorities, or using force or threats to rescue

11978–1978
Kearns v. City of New Orleans green
lactapp · 1935
1 sentence

1954Supporting the proposition, hé cites as controlling here the cases of Kearns v. City of New Orleans, La.App., 160 So. 470 , and State ex rel.

11954–1954
State v. Major neutral
la · 1935
2 sentences

1943That is what we said in the case of State v. Major, 181 La. 822 , 160 So. 425, 427 , thus: “The expression ‘and perform all other duties imposed by law1 has reference not only to the duties which were already imposed by law, but also to such appropriate duties as might thereafter be imposed by law.

1943That is what we said in the case of State v. Major, 181 La. 822 , 160 So. 425, 427 , thus: “The expression ‘and perform all other duties imposed by law1 has reference not only to the duties which were already imposed by law, but also to such appropriate duties as might thereafter be imposed by law.

11943–1943
Brodtman v. Finerty green
la · 1906
2 sentences

1943The case of Brodtman et al. v. Finerty, 116 La. 1103 , 41 So. 329 , is cited.

1943The case of Brodtman et al. v. Finerty, 116 La. 1103 , 41 So. 329 , is cited.

11943–1943
State v. Maloney green
la · 1905
1 sentence

1927Maloney, 115 La. 509 , 39 So. 539 , the court said: “The right accorded .to parties convicted of crime to apply for a new trial, and the power and authority conferred upon district courts to grant the same, is the great remedy afforded by the lawmaker for the ascertainment and correction of any errors and resulting injury which may have taken place in the proceedings.” This important right, even in civil cases, cannot be refused, especially in cases involving small amounts, unless clearly denied by the iaw.

11927–1927

Where else courts name it

CA 33 (1900–2018) NY 17 (1842–2008) AL 17 (1880–2005) MS 12 (1894–2001) MO 12 (1879–1967) LA 11 (1927–2021) NC 9 (1881–1962) TN 8 (1908–1950) NJ 8 (1906–2020) PA 7 (1858–2026) KY 7 (1878–1926) IL 7 (1886–2009) CT 6 (1929–2001) MT 6 (1904–2016) MI 5 (1908–2001) TX 5 (1918–1992) WA 4 (1990–2017) FL 4 (1925–1978) OH 4 (2002–2019) OR 4 (1915–2003) SD 4 (1895–1931) MA 3 (1915–1979) OK 3 (1905–1923) GA 3 (1888–1975) WV 3 (1909–1946) MD 3 (1907–1979) KS 2 (1884–2020) NM 2 (1933–1960) NH 2 (1919–1963) IN 2 (1901–1970)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check