statements defense (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

statements defense in Michigan

11 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1966–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Gistgreen
michctapp · 1991 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See People v Gist, 188 Mich App 610, 613 ; 470 NW2d 475 (1991) (defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to object where an objection would have been pointless). -4- II.

2017See People v Gist, 188 Mich App 610, 613 ; 470 NW2d 475 (1991) (defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to object where an objection would have been pointless). -4- II.

22
Detroit News, Inc. v. Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of City of Detroitgreen
michctapp · 2002 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See Detroit News, Inc v Policemen and Firemen Retirement Sys of Detroit, 252 Mich App 59, 66 ; 651 NW2d 127 (2002). 5 The Court also held that the duties defined in MCL 554.139(1)(b) applied only to premises and not common areas.

2017See Detroit News, Inc v Policemen and Firemen Retirement Sys of Detroit, 252 Mich App 59, 66 ; 651 NW2d 127 (2002). 5 The Court also held that the duties defined in MCL 554.139(1)(b) applied only to premises and not common areas.

22
Huffman v. Stategreen
moctapp · 1973 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1974–1974
1 sentence

1974Likewise, in Huffman v State, 499 SW2d 565, 568-569 (Mo App, 1973), the Court stated the rule as follows: "More appropriate to the present case is the statement in Brown v State, 485 SW2d 424 (Mo, 1972) where it was said, l.c.430: "' * * * The failure of the trial court to follow the recommendations of the prosecuting attorney in this case does not indicate a "manifest injustice”.’ "and in the case of Mick v State, 487 SW2d 452 (Mo, 1972), where It was said, l.c.454: "' * * * A disappointed hope of a lesser sentence than that actually received does not render a plea of guilty involuntary when

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
People v. McLaughlin green
michctapp · 2003
2 sentences

2017People v McLaughlin, 258 Mich App 635, 646 ; 672 NW2d 860 (2003).

2017People v McLaughlin, 258 Mich App 635, 646 ; 672 NW2d 860 (2003).

22017–2017
People v. Carines green
mich · 1999
1 sentence

2026To show that a plain error affected his substantial rights, Wilson must establish “that the error affected the outcome of the lower court proceedings.” Carines, 460 Mich at 763 .

12026–2026
People v. Parker green
michctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2021People v Parker, 230 Mich App 677, 690 ; 584 NW2d 753 (1998).

2021People v Parker, 230 Mich App 677, 690 ; 584 NW2d 753 (1998).

12021–2021
People v. Meeboer green
mich · 1992
2 sentences

2014In People v Meeboer (After Remand), 439 Mich 310, 315 ; 484 NW2d 621 (1992), the Michigan Supreme Court examined the application of MRE 803(4) to hearsay statements made to medical providers by child victims of sexual abuse.

2014In People v Meeboer (After Remand), 439 Mich 310, 315 ; 484 NW2d 621 (1992), the Michigan Supreme Court examined the application of MRE 803(4) to hearsay statements made to medical providers by child victims of sexual abuse.

12014–2014
Brown v. State green
mo · 1972
1 sentence

1974Likewise, in Huffman v State, 499 SW2d 565, 568-569 (Mo App, 1973), the Court stated the rule as follows: "More appropriate to the present case is the statement in Brown v State, 485 SW2d 424 (Mo, 1972) where it was said, l.c.430: "' * * * The failure of the trial court to follow the recommendations of the prosecuting attorney in this case does not indicate a "manifest injustice”.’ "and in the case of Mick v State, 487 SW2d 452 (Mo, 1972), where It was said, l.c.454: "' * * * A disappointed hope of a lesser sentence than that actually received does not render a plea of guilty involuntary when

11974–1974
The People v. Grabowski green
ill · 1957
1 sentence

1974(People v Grabowski [1957], 12 Ill 2d 462, 468, 147 NE2d 49, 52 ; People v Morreale [1952], 412 Ill 528, 532, 107 NE2d 721, 724 .) Thus, the question we must decide is whether there was sufficient evidence before the court, at the hearing on the motion to dismiss, to determine whether the statements of defense counsel on which defendant purportedly relied constituted a prediction estimating leniency or an absolute promise.” 17 Ill App 3d 249, 251-252; 307 NE2d 770, 772 .

11974–1974
People v. Morreale green
ill · 1952
1 sentence

1974(People v Grabowski [1957], 12 Ill 2d 462, 468, 147 NE2d 49, 52 ; People v Morreale [1952], 412 Ill 528, 532, 107 NE2d 721, 724 .) Thus, the question we must decide is whether there was sufficient evidence before the court, at the hearing on the motion to dismiss, to determine whether the statements of defense counsel on which defendant purportedly relied constituted a prediction estimating leniency or an absolute promise.” 17 Ill App 3d 249, 251-252; 307 NE2d 770, 772 .

11974–1974
People v. Carmichael neutral
illappct · 1974
1 sentence

1974(People v Grabowski [1957], 12 Ill 2d 462, 468, 147 NE2d 49, 52 ; People v Morreale [1952], 412 Ill 528, 532, 107 NE2d 721, 724 .) Thus, the question we must decide is whether there was sufficient evidence before the court, at the hearing on the motion to dismiss, to determine whether the statements of defense counsel on which defendant purportedly relied constituted a prediction estimating leniency or an absolute promise.” 17 Ill App 3d 249, 251-252; 307 NE2d 770, 772 .

11974–1974
Mick v. State green
mo · 1972
1 sentence

1974Likewise, in Huffman v State, 499 SW2d 565, 568-569 (Mo App, 1973), the Court stated the rule as follows: "More appropriate to the present case is the statement in Brown v State, 485 SW2d 424 (Mo, 1972) where it was said, l.c.430: "' * * * The failure of the trial court to follow the recommendations of the prosecuting attorney in this case does not indicate a "manifest injustice”.’ "and in the case of Mick v State, 487 SW2d 452 (Mo, 1972), where It was said, l.c.454: "' * * * A disappointed hope of a lesser sentence than that actually received does not render a plea of guilty involuntary when

11974–1974
Sacchetti v. Recreation Co. green
mich · 1943
1 sentence

1966Sacchetti v. Recreation Company (1943), 304 Mich 185 .

11966–1966

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520b (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.520c (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 769.12 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 56 (1912–2025) NY 41 (1934–2025) IL 34 (1960–2024) TX 30 (1924–2019) CO 18 (1904–2025) MO 17 (1933–2022) FL 17 (1962–2025) PA 17 (1903–2020) OH 14 (2003–2025) IA 14 (1930–2022) GA 13 (1940–2021) OR 12 (1934–2026) MA 12 (1981–2026) KY 11 (1913–2008) MI 11 (1966–2026) UT 9 (1919–2026) AL 9 (1919–2003) WI 8 (1940–2024) TN 8 (2001–2020) WA 7 (1911–2023) KS 6 (1933–2026) IN 5 (1989–2020) AZ 5 (1974–2018) LA 5 (1936–1998) NE 5 (1909–2020) AR 5 (1990–2010) VA 4 (1930–2024) NJ 4 (1957–2019) CT 4 (1992–2012) NV 4 (1989–2020) OK 4 (1909–2011) NH 4 (2009–2025) NM 4 (1964–2012) MN 4 (1978–2023) MS 4 (1970–2014) NC 3 (1984–2018) DC 3 (2025–2026) MT 3 (1931–2025) WV 3 (1938–1955) MD 3 (1981–2004) AK 2 (1984–1992) RI 2 (2016–2016) WY 2 (1927–2003) VT 2 (1891–2008) ME 2 (1952–2009) SC 2 (1937–1988) SD 2 (1999–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check