Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1919–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2012See Johnson, 2007 UT App 184, ¶ 34 , 163 P.3d 695 . 2012See Johnson, 2007 UT App 184, ¶ 34 , 163 P.3d 695 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Garciagreen1 sentence2000See id.; see also State v. Garcia, 663 P.2d 60, 65 (Utah 1983) (holding defendant's threat, "I will kill you," was intended to deter bystander from helping police officer and was not hearsay as it was not offered to prove its truth). 129 In this case, like Carlsen,, the fact that a threatening statement was made served as the basis for the charged offense. | 1 | 1 |
Stanley v. Stanleygreen2 sentences1981Although this Court's statements of the standard of review of findings of fact in equity cases have varied considerably, Stanley v. Stanley, 97 Utah 520, 528 , 94 P.2d 465, 468 (1939) (Wolfe, J., concurring), it is most commonly said that we reverse only when the evidence clearly preponderates against the findings of the trial court. 1981Although this Court's statements of the standard of review of findings of fact in equity cases have varied considerably, Stanley v. Stanley, 97 Utah 520, 528 , 94 P.2d 465, 468 (1939) (Wolfe, J., concurring), it is most commonly said that we reverse only when the evidence clearly preponderates against the findings of the trial court. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 10847912
green
1 sentence2026Terry’s son, Destry, provided sheet metal for the of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure permits a party to “deny all of the statements in a claim by general denial.” The Nielsens do not address why we should not treat the Cronquists’ denial as a general denial consistent with rule 8. 20240680-CA 22 2026 UT App 65 Nielsen v. Cronquist shed’s roofing and siding, and left some of it near the shed. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Stubbs
green
1 sentence2025Thus, given the court’s statements at the hearing, as well as the overall structure of its analysis, the result is the same: the court’s “even if” phraseology is most naturally read here as a transition for its explanation of why it was denying the motion as a whole, as opposed to somehow being an unspoken invalidation of a finding about a material change in circumstances that it had already pointedly made. ¶30 Second, the State points out that, in the written ruling, the court wrote that it held “both parties responsible for various delays.” From this, the State suggests that the court did no | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Nielsen v. Cronquist
green
1 sentence2025Terry’s son, Destry, provided sheet metal for the of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure permits a party to “deny all of the statements in a claim by general denial.” The Nielsens do not address why we should not treat the Cronquists’ denial as a general denial consistent with rule 8. 20240680-CA 15 2025 UT App 199 Nielsen v. Cronquist shed’s roofing and siding, and left some of it near the shed. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Timmerman
green
1 sentence2023Since the enactment of these amendments, “[a]dmission of evidence at preliminary hearings is exclusively governed by the reliable hearsay language in the Utah Constitution and rule 1102 of the Utah Rules of Evidence.” Timmerman, 2009 UT 58, ¶ 16 . ¶13 At the preliminary hearing in this case, the State offered the officers’ statements under rule 1102(b)(8), arguing that the statements met the requirements of that rule because they were “written” and had been made “pursuant to a notification that a false statement made therein is punishable.” The magistrate (and, later, the district court in con | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Pagano v. Walker
green
2 sentences1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). 1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Pallister v. Colle
neutral
1 sentence1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Crimmins v. Simonds
green
2 sentences1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). 1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Peterson Ex Rel. Broadhead v. Carter
green
2 sentences1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). 1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Utah County v. Baxter
green
1 sentence1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.
green
2 sentences1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). 1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
White v. Heber City
green
1 sentence1981If by such phrase, the claimant did not in substance and effect declare, under oath, that the statements contained in the document or instrument signed by him were true, it is difficult to conceive for what other purpose or effect the oath was or could have been administered to him. [ 26 P.2d at 335 .] That case is distinguishable from the instant case because there the claimant was found by inference at least to have sworn under oath that the statements in the claim were true, whereas in the instant case the language of the jurat as to what is being sworn to is very specific: the claimant swe | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co.
green
2 sentences1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). 1981Crimmins v. Simonds, Utah, 636 P.2d 478 (1981); Utah County v. Baxter, Utah, 635 *152 P.2d 61 (1981); Peterson v. Carter, Utah, 579 P.2d 329 (1978); Pagano v. Walker, Utah, 539 P.2d 452 (1975); Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co., 6 Utah 2d 177 , 308 P.2d 954 (1957); Mollerup v. Daynes-Beebe Music Co., 82 Utah 299 , 24 P.2d 306 (1933). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Barrow v. Territory of Arizona
green
1 sentence1919Assuming that the statements in the instruction were based on evidence, the circumstances should have been submitted to the jury without the statement that they "may raise a presumption of guilt in the possessor. ’ ’ Barrow v. Territory, 13 Ariz. 302 , 114 Pac. 976 ; Smith v. State, 58 Ind. 340 ; 2 Am. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Smith v. State
neutral
1 sentence1919Assuming that the statements in the instruction were based on evidence, the circumstances should have been submitted to the jury without the statement that they "may raise a presumption of guilt in the possessor. ’ ’ Barrow v. Territory, 13 Ariz. 302 , 114 Pac. 976 ; Smith v. State, 58 Ind. 340 ; 2 Am. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.