property damage claim (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

property damage claim in New Jersey

11 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1958–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Strauss v. Fostgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1986 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1986–2003
2 sentences

2003In Strauss I, we allowed a deduction of the one-third fee from the plaintiff's recovery against the attorney defendant. 209 N.J.Super. at 499 , 507 A. 2d 1189 .

2003In Strauss I, we allowed a deduction of the one-third fee from the plaintiff's recovery against the attorney defendant. 209 N.J.Super. at 499 , 507 A. 2d 1189 .

12
Reardon v. Allengreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1965 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996Although the property damage action was brought in the name of Dennis Reardon, he was merely a formal party, one without control over the action and without a proprietary or financial interest in its outcome____ [Id. at 564, 213 A.2d 26 .] See also Isaacson v. Boswell, 18 N.J.Super. 95, 99-100 , 86 A.2d 695 (App.Div.1952) (holding that settlement of Boswell’s prior property damage action by Isaacson’s insurance carrier did not preclude Isaacson from prosecuting separate action to recover for property damage to his vehicle); De Carlucci v. Brasley, 16 N.J.Super. 48, 52-53 , 83 A.2d 823 (Law Div

1996Although the property damage action was brought in the name of Dennis Reardon, he was merely a formal party, one without control over the action and without a proprietary or financial interest in its outcome.... [ Id. at 564 , 213 A. 2d 26 .] See also Isaacson v. Boswell, 18 N.J.

11
Smith v. Fischer Baking Co.green
nj · 1929 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1965–1965
1 sentence

1965See Smith v. Fischer Baking Co., 105 N.J.L. 567 ( E. & A. 1929), holding the vehicle owner's property damage claim is not barred by an adverse judgment in the personal injury action of his driver-employee.

11
Kelleher v. Lozzigreen
nj · 1951 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1958–1958
1 sentence

1958See Kelleher v. Lozzi, supra .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CHURCH green
njsuperctappdiv · 1968
2 sentences

1996Joinder of such claims is permissive, not mandatory.” Id. at 500 , 242 A.2d 652 .

1996Joinder of such claims is permissive, not mandatory.” Id. at 500 , 242 A.2d 652 .

31992–1996
Pickett v. Lloyd's green
nj · 1993
2 sentences

2008Pickett, supra, 131 N.J. at 461-64 , 621 A. 2d 445 .

2008Pickett, supra, 131 N.J. at 461-64 , 621 A. 2d 445 .

12008–2008
Mody v. Brooks green
njsuperctappdiv · 2001
1 sentence

2002Id. at 402 , 772 A. 2d 21 .

12002–2002
De Carlucci v. Brasley neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 1951
2 sentences

1996Although the property damage action was brought in the name of Dennis Reardon, he was merely a formal party, one without control over the action and without a proprietary or financial interest in its outcome____ [Id. at 564, 213 A.2d 26 .] See also Isaacson v. Boswell, 18 N.J.Super. 95, 99-100 , 86 A.2d 695 (App.Div.1952) (holding that settlement of Boswell’s prior property damage action by Isaacson’s insurance carrier did not preclude Isaacson from prosecuting separate action to recover for property damage to his vehicle); De Carlucci v. Brasley, 16 N.J.Super. 48, 52-53 , 83 A.2d 823 (Law Div

1996Although the property damage action was brought in the name of Dennis Reardon, he was merely a formal party, one without control over the action and without a proprietary or financial interest in its outcome____ [Id. at 564, 213 A.2d 26 .] See also Isaacson v. Boswell, 18 N.J.Super. 95, 99-100 , 86 A.2d 695 (App.Div.1952) (holding that settlement of Boswell’s prior property damage action by Isaacson’s insurance carrier did not preclude Isaacson from prosecuting separate action to recover for property damage to his vehicle); De Carlucci v. Brasley, 16 N.J.Super. 48, 52-53 , 83 A.2d 823 (Law Div

11996–1996
Isaacson v. Boswell green
njsuperctappdiv · 1952
2 sentences

1996Although the property damage action was brought in the name of Dennis Reardon, he was merely a formal party, one without control over the action and without a proprietary or financial interest in its outcome____ [Id. at 564, 213 A.2d 26 .] See also Isaacson v. Boswell, 18 N.J.Super. 95, 99-100 , 86 A.2d 695 (App.Div.1952) (holding that settlement of Boswell’s prior property damage action by Isaacson’s insurance carrier did not preclude Isaacson from prosecuting separate action to recover for property damage to his vehicle); De Carlucci v. Brasley, 16 N.J.Super. 48, 52-53 , 83 A.2d 823 (Law Div

1996Although the property damage action was brought in the name of Dennis Reardon, he was merely a formal party, one without control over the action and without a proprietary or financial interest in its outcome____ [Id. at 564, 213 A.2d 26 .] See also Isaacson v. Boswell, 18 N.J.Super. 95, 99-100 , 86 A.2d 695 (App.Div.1952) (holding that settlement of Boswell’s prior property damage action by Isaacson’s insurance carrier did not preclude Isaacson from prosecuting separate action to recover for property damage to his vehicle); De Carlucci v. Brasley, 16 N.J.Super. 48, 52-53 , 83 A.2d 823 (Law Div

11996–1996
Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc. green
nj · 1973
1 sentence

1983Id. at 156 .

11983–1983
De Sisto v. City of Linden green
njsuperctappdiv · 1963
1 sentence

1971In Lawlor, Greco and DeSisto, supra, the third-party defendants, whom the plaintiffs were seeking to make direct defendants, had been served with the third-party complaint and were at least third-party defendants within the two-year statutory period.

11971–1971

Where else courts name it

NY 21 (1939–2026) LA 19 (1969–2026) TX 18 (1973–2026) CA 18 (1981–2016) IL 17 (1977–2016) WV 11 (1957–2024) NJ 11 (1958–2008) GA 8 (1983–2016) OK 8 (1989–2023) PA 7 (1982–2017) OH 7 (1951–2025) FL 6 (1966–2013) MO 5 (1970–2024) VA 5 (1987–2018) IN 5 (1949–2003) MT 5 (1972–2023) MS 4 (1992–2003) MA 4 (1974–2012) NC 4 (1995–2026) AZ 3 (2009–2025) AR 3 (2003–2022) CT 3 (1985–2000) MI 3 (1977–1993) NE 2 (1984–1989) UT 2 (2001–2017) WA 2 (1983–2011) MD 2 (1986–2012) OR 2 (1996–1998) IA 2 (2019–2019) SC 2 (2015–2023) SD 2 (1998–1998) AL 2 (1991–2002) CO 2 (2009–2009) ME 2 (1991–2008) WY 2 (2013–2013) KS 2 (1976–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check