Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1987–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & Fine
green
2 sentences2018The client thereafter fired the attorney "entirely without just cause," Heinzman , 217 Va. at 962 n.3, 234 S.E.2d 282 , and hired another attorney to pursue the personal injury claim. 2018The client thereafter fired the attorney "entirely without just cause," Heinzman , 217 Va. at 962 n.3, 234 S.E.2d 282 , and hired another attorney to pursue the personal injury claim. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Carter v. Hinkle
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 3 , 52 S.E.2d at 136 . 2003Id. at 3 , 52 S.E.2d at 136 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
William v. City of Newport News
green
1 sentence1994In William v. City of Newport News, 240 Va. 425 (1990), the Supreme Court held that self-insurers are subject to the requirements of the uninsured motorist statute, Code § 38.2-2206. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Commonwealth v. Millsaps
green
2 sentences1992Thus, the Court, adhering to precedent, reaffirmed the principle as follows: "Under the `fireman's rule,' such officers are held, as a matter of law, to assume the risks of injury occasioned by ordinary negligence inherently involved in the normal pursuit of their duties." Id. at 509-10 , 352 S.E.2d at 315 (citing Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. 1992Thus, the Court, adhering to precedent, reaffirmed the principle as follows: “Under the ‘fireman’s rule,’ such officers are held, as a matter of law, to assume the risks of injury occasioned by ordinary negligence inherently involved in the normal pursuit of their duties.” Id. at 509-10 , 352 S.E.2d at 315 (citing Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Pearson v. Canada Contracting Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1992In Millsaps , a property-damage claim on behalf of the Commonwealth, the Court stated, "we perceive no logical basis for a distinction between damage to public property and injuries to public officers." Id. 1992In Millsaps , a property-damage claim on behalf of the Commonwealth, the Court stated, “we perceive no logical basis for a distinction between damage to public property and injuries to public officers.” Id. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Petrus v. Robbins
green
1 sentence1987Petrus v. Robbins, 196 Va. 322 (1954). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.