Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1939–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Florida v. Royergreen2 sentences2012See Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497 (1983) (“Neither is it disputed that where the validity of a search rests on consent, the State has the burden of proving that the necessary consent was obtained and that it was freely and voluntarily given, a burden that is not satisfied by showing a mere submission to a claim of lawful authority.”). 2008The Court stated “[t]here [was] no reason to think Kaupp’s answer was anything more than ‘a mere submission to a claim of lawful authority.’ ” Id. (citing Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1324 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (plurality opinion)). | 2 | 8 |
McCullough v. Stategreen2 sentences1987Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1324 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983); Meeks v. State, 692 S.W.2d 504, 509-10 (Tex.Crim.App.1985). 1987Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1324 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983); Meeks v. State, 692 S.W.2d 504, 509-10 (Tex.Crim.App.1985). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kaupp v. Texas
green
2 sentences2021Rather, Luna’s “acknowledgment and oral acceptance” of the DWI and Miranda warnings she received at the end of her SFSTs appear to be “a mere submission to a claim of lawful authority.” Kaupp, 538 U.S. at 631 . 2008The Court stated “[t]here [was] no reason to think Kaupp’s answer was anything more than ‘a mere submission to a claim of lawful authority.’ ” Id. (citing Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1324 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (plurality opinion)). | 3 | 2008–2021 |
Clark Loftus v. Pearce
neutral
2 sentences1939Clark v. Pearce, 80 Tex. 146 , 15 S.W. 787 . 1939Clark v. Pearce, 80 Tex. 146 , 15 S.W. 787 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.