11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williams-Walkergreen1 sentence2016See State v. Williams-Walker, 167 Wn.2d 889, 901-02 , 225 P.3d 913 (2010) (trial court’s imposition of firearm sentencing enhancement when jury returned a special verdict finding that the defendant had been armed with only a deadly weapon was error). 12 RCW 9.41.270(3) establishes the place-of-abode exception. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williams-Walkergreen1 sentence2016See State v. Williams-Walker, 167 Wn.2d 889, 901-02 , 225 P.3d 913 (2010) (trial court’s imposition of firearm sentencing enhancement when jury returned a special verdict finding that the defendant had been armed with only a deadly weapon was error). 12 RCW 9.41.270(3) establishes the place-of-abode exception. | 1 | 1 |
Butler v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.green1 sentence2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . | 1 | 1 |
Faltas v. State Newspapergreen1 sentence2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hutchinsongreen1 sentence2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hutchinsongreen1 sentence2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Winings
green
2 sentences2013Winings, 126 Wn. 2013Winings, 126 Wn. | 3 | 2012–2013 |
State v. Leach
green
2 sentences2005Leach, 113 Wn.2d at 687 . ¶12 In this case, Winings was charged with second degree assault while armed with a deadly weapon in violation of RCW 9A.36.021, which provides in relevant part: (1) A person is guilty of assault in the second degree if he or she, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first degree: (c) Assaults another with a deadly weapon. 2005Leach, 113 Wash.2d at 687 , 782 P.2d 552 . ¶ 12 In this case, Winings was charged with second degree assault while armed with a deadly weapon in violation of RCW 9A.36.021, which provides in relevant part: (1) A person is guilty of assault in the second degree if he or she, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first degree: .... (c) Assaults another with a deadly weapon. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Skenandore
green
2 sentences2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wn. 2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Laramie
neutral
1 sentence2019App. 332, 341 , 169 P.3d 859 (2007), the defendant was charged with assault with a deadly weapon in violation of RCW 9A.36.021(1)(a). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Akers
neutral
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Benn
green
2 sentences2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . 2000State v. Skenandore, 99 Wash.App. 494, 499 , 994 P.2d 291 (2000); see also State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d 863, 885 , 959 P.2d 1061 (1998) (an instruction must state the applicable law correctly and must be supported by the evidence), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 , 119 S.Ct. 1065 , 143 L.Ed.2d 69 (1999); Benn, 120 Wash.2d at 654 , 845 P.2d 289 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence1984App. 506 , 667 P.2d 1117 (1983); State v. Claborn, 95 Wn.2d 629 , 628 P.2d 467 (1981); State v. Hall, 95 Wn.2d 536 , 627 P.2d 101 (1981); and In re Taylor, 95 Wn.2d 940 , 632 P.2d 56 (1981) as support for its contention that the facts of this case so strongly support a finding that Belmarez himself stabbed Fitzer that the deadly weapon instruction was harmless error. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
In Re the Personal Restraint of Taylor
green
2 sentences1984App. 506 , 667 P.2d 1117 (1983); State v. Claborn, 95 Wn.2d 629 , 628 P.2d 467 (1981); State v. Hall, 95 Wn.2d 536 , 627 P.2d 101 (1981); and In re Taylor, 95 Wn.2d 940 , 632 P.2d 56 (1981) as support for its contention that the facts of this case so strongly support a finding that Belmarez himself stabbed Fitzer that the deadly weapon instruction was harmless error. 1984App. 506 , 667 P.2d 1117 (1983); State v. Claborn, 95 Wn.2d 629 , 628 P.2d 467 (1981); State v. Hall, 95 Wn.2d 536 , 627 P.2d 101 (1981); and In re Taylor, 95 Wn.2d 940 , 632 P.2d 56 (1981) as support for its contention that the facts of this case so strongly support a finding that Belmarez himself stabbed Fitzer that the deadly weapon instruction was harmless error. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Claborn
green
2 sentences1984App. 506 , 667 P.2d 1117 (1983); State v. Claborn, 95 Wn.2d 629 , 628 P.2d 467 (1981); State v. Hall, 95 Wn.2d 536 , 627 P.2d 101 (1981); and In re Taylor, 95 Wn.2d 940 , 632 P.2d 56 (1981) as support for its contention that the facts of this case so strongly support a finding that Belmarez himself stabbed Fitzer that the deadly weapon instruction was harmless error. 1984App. 506 , 667 P.2d 1117 (1983); State v. Claborn, 95 Wn.2d 629 , 628 P.2d 467 (1981); State v. Hall, 95 Wn.2d 536 , 627 P.2d 101 (1981); and In re Taylor, 95 Wn.2d 940 , 632 P.2d 56 (1981) as support for its contention that the facts of this case so strongly support a finding that Belmarez himself stabbed Fitzer that the deadly weapon instruction was harmless error. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
State v. Hall
green
2 sentences1984App. 506 , 667 P.2d 1117 (1983); State v. Claborn, 95 Wn.2d 629 , 628 P.2d 467 (1981); State v. Hall, 95 Wn.2d 536 , 627 P.2d 101 (1981); and In re Taylor, 95 Wn.2d 940 , 632 P.2d 56 (1981) as support for its contention that the facts of this case so strongly support a finding that Belmarez himself stabbed Fitzer that the deadly weapon instruction was harmless error. 1984App. 506 , 667 P.2d 1117 (1983); State v. Claborn, 95 Wn.2d 629 , 628 P.2d 467 (1981); State v. Hall, 95 Wn.2d 536 , 627 P.2d 101 (1981); and In re Taylor, 95 Wn.2d 940 , 632 P.2d 56 (1981) as support for its contention that the facts of this case so strongly support a finding that Belmarez himself stabbed Fitzer that the deadly weapon instruction was harmless error. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.