7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Long v. Stategreen2 sentences2014We therefore conclude that there is no element of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon that is not contained in armed robbery[.] (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Long v. State, 287 Ga. 886, 889-890 (2) ( 700 SE2d 399 ) (2010). 2014We therefore conclude that there is no element of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon that is not contained in armed robbery[.] (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Long v. State, 287 Ga. 886, 889-890 (2) ( 700 SE2d 399 ) (2010). | 2 | 2 |
Morris v. the Stategreen2 sentences2019Thus, there is no element of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon that is not contained in armed robbery. 17 Morris v. State, 340 Ga. App. 295, 313-314 (7) ( 797 SE2d 207 ) (2017) (citations and punctuation omitted). 2019Thus, there is no element of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon that is not contained in armed robbery. 17 Morris v. State, 340 Ga. App. 295, 313-314 (7) ( 797 SE2d 207 ) (2017) (citations and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Harris v. State, 273 Ga. 608, 610 (2) ( 543 SE2d 716 ) (2001). 2003Harris v. State, 273 Ga. 608, 610 (2) ( 543 SE2d 716 ) (2001). | 1 | 1 |
Rower v. Stategreen2 sentences1995The denial of defendant’s pre-trial motion for the appointment of an expert to conduct an independent DNA analysis is enumerated as error, on the ground that this deprived defendant of a “fair trial and equal treatment under the law because of his economic status.” Unlike blood samples, ballistics reports, and other routine scientific analyses, defendant’s request for the appointment of an independent expert to challenge the State’s analysis of DNA band patterns arguably “involves critical evidence [within the meaning of Sabel v. State, 248 Ga. 10, 16 (6) ( 282 SE2d 61 ), overruled in part on 1995The denial of defendant’s pre-trial motion for the appointment of an expert to conduct an independent DNA analysis is enumerated as error, on the ground that this deprived defendant of a “fair trial and equal treatment under the law because of his economic status.” Unlike blood samples, ballistics reports, and other routine scientific analyses, defendant’s request for the appointment of an independent expert to challenge the State’s analysis of DNA band patterns arguably “involves critical evidence [within the meaning of Sabel v. State, 248 Ga. 10, 16 (6) ( 282 SE2d 61 ), overruled in part on | 1 | 1 |
Thornton v. Stategreen2 sentences1995The denial of defendant’s pre-trial motion for the appointment of an expert to conduct an independent DNA analysis is enumerated as error, on the ground that this deprived defendant of a “fair trial and equal treatment under the law because of his economic status.” Unlike blood samples, ballistics reports, and other routine scientific analyses, defendant’s request for the appointment of an independent expert to challenge the State’s analysis of DNA band patterns arguably “involves critical evidence [within the meaning of Sabel v. State, 248 Ga. 10, 16 (6) ( 282 SE2d 61 ), overruled in part on 1995The denial of defendant’s pre-trial motion for the appointment of an expert to conduct an independent DNA analysis is enumerated as error, on the ground that this deprived defendant of a “fair trial and equal treatment under the law because of his economic status.” Unlike blood samples, ballistics reports, and other routine scientific analyses, defendant’s request for the appointment of an independent expert to challenge the State’s analysis of DNA band patterns arguably “involves critical evidence [within the meaning of Sabel v. State, 248 Ga. 10, 16 (6) ( 282 SE2d 61 ), overruled in part on | 1 | 1 |
Sabel v. Stategreen2 sentences1995The denial of defendant’s pre-trial motion for the appointment of an expert to conduct an independent DNA analysis is enumerated as error, on the ground that this deprived defendant of a “fair trial and equal treatment under the law because of his economic status.” Unlike blood samples, ballistics reports, and other routine scientific analyses, defendant’s request for the appointment of an independent expert to challenge the State’s analysis of DNA band patterns arguably “involves critical evidence [within the meaning of Sabel v. State, 248 Ga. 10, 16 (6) ( 282 SE2d 61 ), overruled in part on 1995The denial of defendant’s pre-trial motion for the appointment of an expert to conduct an independent DNA analysis is enumerated as error, on the ground that this deprived defendant of a “fair trial and equal treatment under the law because of his economic status.” Unlike blood samples, ballistics reports, and other routine scientific analyses, defendant’s request for the appointment of an independent expert to challenge the State’s analysis of DNA band patterns arguably “involves critical evidence [within the meaning of Sabel v. State, 248 Ga. 10, 16 (6) ( 282 SE2d 61 ), overruled in part on | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Virginia
red
1 sentence1995The evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) to authorize the jury’s verdict that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in violation of OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (2). 3. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Kelly v. State
green
2 sentences1979Kelly v. State, 241 Ga. 190 ( 243 SE2d 857 ). 1979Kelly v. State, 241 Ga. 190 ( 243 SE2d 857 ). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Patterson v. State
green
2 sentences1978We have held conversely to this contention in Patterson v. State, 239 Ga. 409 ( 238 SE2d 2 ) (1977); Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 454 ( 241 SE2d 204 ) (1978); and Davis v. State, 237 Ga. 279 ( 227 SE2d 249 ) (1976). 1978We have held conversely to this contention in Patterson v. State, 239 Ga. 409 ( 238 SE2d 2 ) (1977); Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 454 ( 241 SE2d 204 ) (1978); and Davis v. State, 237 Ga. 279 ( 227 SE2d 249 ) (1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Davis v. State
green
2 sentences1978We have held conversely to this contention in Patterson v. State, 239 Ga. 409 ( 238 SE2d 2 ) (1977); Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 454 ( 241 SE2d 204 ) (1978); and Davis v. State, 237 Ga. 279 ( 227 SE2d 249 ) (1976). 1978We have held conversely to this contention in Patterson v. State, 239 Ga. 409 ( 238 SE2d 2 ) (1977); Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 454 ( 241 SE2d 204 ) (1978); and Davis v. State, 237 Ga. 279 ( 227 SE2d 249 ) (1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Thomas v. State
green
2 sentences1978We have held conversely to this contention in Patterson v. State, 239 Ga. 409 ( 238 SE2d 2 ) (1977); Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 454 ( 241 SE2d 204 ) (1978); and Davis v. State, 237 Ga. 279 ( 227 SE2d 249 ) (1976). 1978We have held conversely to this contention in Patterson v. State, 239 Ga. 409 ( 238 SE2d 2 ) (1977); Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 454 ( 241 SE2d 204 ) (1978); and Davis v. State, 237 Ga. 279 ( 227 SE2d 249 ) (1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.