10 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.green2 sentences2020At issue in Williamson v. Mazda Motor of Am., Inc., 562 U.S. 323 (2011), was a later version of the same safety standard in Geier that, by 1989, required automakers to install lap-and-shoulder belts in the rear seats of passenger cars next to the vehicle's doors or frames, but allowed simple lap belts in the rear inner seats. 2020Id. at 326. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sucharewgreen2 sentences2010State v. Sucharew, 205 Ariz. 16, 21, ¶ 9 , 66 P.3d 59, 64 (App.2003). 2010State v. Sucharew, 205 Ariz. 16, 21, ¶ 9 , 66 P.3d 59, 64 (App.2003). | 1 | 1 |
National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raabgreen1 sentence2003Instead, a railroad employee, in the absence of any individualized suspicion, could only be tested if the employee was involved in a “triggering event” such as a train accident or incident, or a safety-rule violation. 489 U.S. at 609-11, 109 S.Ct. 1402 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Puiggreen2 sentences1991However, in State v. Puig, 112 Ariz. 519, 520 , 544 P.2d 201, 202 (1975), the supreme court held that law enforcement officers are entitled to detain a defendant while a records check is conducted when a defendant has been stopped for a safety violation and is unable to produce a valid driver’s license or vehicle registration. 1991However, in State v. Puig, 112 Ariz. 519, 520 , 544 P.2d 201, 202 (1975), the supreme court held that law enforcement officers are entitled to detain a defendant while a records check is conducted when a defendant has been stopped for a safety violation and is unable to produce a valid driver’s license or vehicle registration. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.
green
2 sentences2003Instead, a railroad employee, in the absence of any individualized suspicion, could only be tested if the employee was involved in a “triggering event” such as a train accident or incident, or a safety-rule violation. 489 U.S. at 609-11, 109 S.Ct. 1402 . 2003Instead, a railroad employee, in the absence of any individualized suspicion, could only be tested if the employee was involved in a "triggering event" such as a train accident or incident, or a safety-rule violation. 489 U.S. at 609-11, 109 S.Ct. 1402 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Schroeder v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1990Id. at 457-59 , 646 P.2d at 888-90 . 1990Id. at 457-59 , 646 P.2d at 888-90 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Fluor Corporation v. Sykes
green
2 sentences1990Finally, we distinguish the “safety retention” case of Fluor Corp. v. Sykes, 3 Ariz. App. 211 , 413 P.2d 270 (1966) in the same manner it was distinguished in Chesin: in Fluor, there was substantial evidence that the safety violation which resulted in the injury to the subcontractor’s employee had been taken over specifically by the general contractor such that the general contractor had control of the details of that work. 1990Finally, we distinguish the “safety retention” case of Fluor Corp. v. Sykes, 3 Ariz. App. 211 , 413 P.2d 270 (1966) in the same manner it was distinguished in Chesin: in Fluor, there was substantial evidence that the safety violation which resulted in the injury to the subcontractor’s employee had been taken over specifically by the general contractor such that the general contractor had control of the details of that work. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Richards v. Maine Central Railroad
green
1 sentence1975Richards v. Main Central Railroad; 21 F.R.D. 590 (S.D.Me.1957); Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co., 53 F.R.D. 283 (N.D.Ga.1971); cf. City of Phoenix v. Peterson, supra. Conclusions reached by Salt River Project as to whether an employee has violated a safety rule and the consequent disciplinary action awarded, if any, would appear irrelevant to the negligence action. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.
green
1 sentence1975Richards v. Main Central Railroad; 21 F.R.D. 590 (S.D.Me.1957); Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co., 53 F.R.D. 283 (N.D.Ga.1971); cf. City of Phoenix v. Peterson, supra. Conclusions reached by Salt River Project as to whether an employee has violated a safety rule and the consequent disciplinary action awarded, if any, would appear irrelevant to the negligence action. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert
green
2 sentences1975The hearing officer found that if the employee's "version of the accident is correct he would be considered a non-participating victim of horseplay which would not preclude the compensability of any injury he received" or "if the co-employee's version of the accident is correct, there was no *364 horseplay involved at all and the only issue remaining is whether the applicant's claim should be denied for the reason that he has violated a safety rule of his employer prohibiting riding on the conveyor belt." The hearing officer applied the rule of Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert, 65 Ariz 1975The hearing officer found that if the employee's "version of the accident is correct he would be considered a non-participating victim of horseplay which would not preclude the compensability of any injury he received" or "if the co-employee's version of the accident is correct, there was no *364 horseplay involved at all and the only issue remaining is whether the applicant's claim should be denied for the reason that he has violated a safety rule of his employer prohibiting riding on the conveyor belt." The hearing officer applied the rule of Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert, 65 Ariz | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Bryan v. Southern Pacific Company
green
2 sentences1974Bryan v. Southern Pacific Company, 79 Ariz. 253 , 286 P.2d 761 (1955). 1974Bryan v. Southern Pacific Company, 79 Ariz. 253 , 286 P.2d 761 (1955). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Jensen v. Southern Pacific Co.
green
2 sentences1956Jensen v. Southern Pacific Company, 129 Cal. App.2d 67 , 276 P.2d 703, 709 ; Tennessee Cent. 1956Jensen v. Southern Pacific Company, 129 Cal. App.2d 67 , 276 P.2d 703, 709 ; Tennessee Cent. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.