Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster Generalgreen1 sentence2022Aug. 18, 2008), the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawai#i applied the Ninth Circuit's test for adverse employment actions in Title VII cases to an HWPA claim, stating that "an action is cognizable as an adverse employment action if it is reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity." Id. at *11 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Ray v. Henderson, 217 F.3d 1234, 1243 (9th Cir. 2000)).8 Fukumoto asserts that within days of her email to Matthews on March 13, 2012, the State discriminated and retaliated against her. | 1 | 1 |
Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.green2 sentences2013Lales at *7; Furukawa v. Honolulu Zoological Soc’y, 85 Hawai'i 7, 17 , 936 P.2d 643, 653 (1997); Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai’i) Ltd., Inc., 76 Hawai'i 454, 462 , 879 P.2d 1037, 1045 (1994). 2013Lales at *7; Furukawa v. Honolulu Zoological Soc’y, 85 Hawai'i 7, 17 , 936 P.2d 643, 653 (1997); Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai’i) Ltd., Inc., 76 Hawai'i 454, 462 , 879 P.2d 1037, 1045 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Fishergreen2 sentences2013Although the federal circuits have applied various tests and exceptions, see Martin v. Fisher, 11 Cal.App.4th 118 , 13 Cal.Rptr.2d 922, 924 (1992), we specifically adopt the Ninth Circuit’s analysis because its precedent applies to EEOC complaints jointly filed with the HCRC; adopting its precedent would therefore be consistent with the legislature’s intention of providing employment discrimination victims with the same remedies under state and federal law. 2013Although the federal circuits have applied various tests and exceptions, see Martin v. Fisher, 11 Cal.App.4th 118 , 13 Cal.Rptr.2d 922, 924 (1992), we specifically adopt the Ninth Circuit’s analysis because its precedent applies to EEOC complaints jointly filed with the HCRC; adopting its precedent would therefore be consistent with the legislature’s intention of providing employment discrimination victims with the same remedies under state and federal law. | 1 | 1 |
Sam Teague, Ltd. v. Hawai'i Civil Rights Commissiongreen2 sentences2013Sam Teague, Ltd. v. Hawai’i Civil Rights Comm’n, 89 Hawai'i 269, 281 , 971 P.2d 1104, 1116 (1999) (citing Hse. 2013Sam Teague, Ltd. v. Hawai’i Civil Rights Comm’n, 89 Hawai'i 269, 281 , 971 P.2d 1104, 1116 (1999) (citing Hse. | 1 | 1 |
Furukawa v. Honolulu Zoological Societygreen2 sentences2013Lales at *7; Furukawa v. Honolulu Zoological Soc’y, 85 Hawai'i 7, 17 , 936 P.2d 643, 653 (1997); Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai’i) Ltd., Inc., 76 Hawai'i 454, 462 , 879 P.2d 1037, 1045 (1994). 2013Lales at *7; Furukawa v. Honolulu Zoological Soc’y, 85 Hawai'i 7, 17 , 936 P.2d 643, 653 (1997); Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai’i) Ltd., Inc., 76 Hawai'i 454, 462 , 879 P.2d 1037, 1045 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
Gen. Accident Ins. Co. of Am. v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.green2 sentences2007In General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Superior Court, 55 Cal.App.4th 1444, 1445-46 , 64 Cal.Rptr.2d 781, 782-83 (1997), Western MacArthur Company, an asbestos distribution company that had taken over Western Asbestos Company, sought a declaratory judgment that certain insurers owed it duties of defense and indemnification. 2007In General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Superior Court, 55 Cal.App.4th 1444, 1445-46 , 64 Cal.Rptr.2d 781, 782-83 (1997), Western MacArthur Company, an asbestos distribution company that had taken over Western Asbestos Company, sought a declaratory judgment that certain insurers owed it duties of defense and indemnification. | 1 | 1 |
Tamashiro v. Department of Human Servicesgreen1 sentence2006Majority op. at ___, 146 P.3d at 117 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
New York State National Organization for Women v. Terrygreen1 sentence2002See, e.g., New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry, 94 F.Supp.2d 465, 470-73 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Dickinson v. Indiana State Election Bd., 817 F.Supp. 737, 750 (S.D.Ind.1992); Spear v. Town of West Hartford, 789 F.Supp. 80, 82 (D.Conn.1992); Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akron, 604 F.Supp. 1275, 1284 (N.D.Ohio 1985); but see U & I Sanitation v. City of Columbus, 112 F.Supp.2d 902, 906 (D.Neb.2000); cf. Martin v. Nickels and Dimes, Inc., 804 F.Supp. 83, 84-85 (D.Haw.1992) (Ninth Circuit rule requires that fee request be filed in the appellate court, which may be sub | 1 | 1 |
Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akrongreen1 sentence2002See, e.g., New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry, 94 F.Supp.2d 465, 470-73 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Dickinson v. Indiana State Election Bd., 817 F.Supp. 737, 750 (S.D.Ind.1992); Spear v. Town of West Hartford, 789 F.Supp. 80, 82 (D.Conn.1992); Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akron, 604 F.Supp. 1275, 1284 (N.D.Ohio 1985); but see U & I Sanitation v. City of Columbus, 112 F.Supp.2d 902, 906 (D.Neb.2000); cf. Martin v. Nickels and Dimes, Inc., 804 F.Supp. 83, 84-85 (D.Haw.1992) (Ninth Circuit rule requires that fee request be filed in the appellate court, which may be sub | 1 | 1 |
Spear v. Town of West Hartfordgreen1 sentence2002See, e.g., New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry, 94 F.Supp.2d 465, 470-73 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Dickinson v. Indiana State Election Bd., 817 F.Supp. 737, 750 (S.D.Ind.1992); Spear v. Town of West Hartford, 789 F.Supp. 80, 82 (D.Conn.1992); Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akron, 604 F.Supp. 1275, 1284 (N.D.Ohio 1985); but see U & I Sanitation v. City of Columbus, 112 F.Supp.2d 902, 906 (D.Neb.2000); cf. Martin v. Nickels and Dimes, Inc., 804 F.Supp. 83, 84-85 (D.Haw.1992) (Ninth Circuit rule requires that fee request be filed in the appellate court, which may be sub | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Nickels and Dimes, Inc.green1 sentence2002See, e.g., New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry, 94 F.Supp.2d 465, 470-73 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Dickinson v. Indiana State Election Bd., 817 F.Supp. 737, 750 (S.D.Ind.1992); Spear v. Town of West Hartford, 789 F.Supp. 80, 82 (D.Conn.1992); Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akron, 604 F.Supp. 1275, 1284 (N.D.Ohio 1985); but see U & I Sanitation v. City of Columbus, 112 F.Supp.2d 902, 906 (D.Neb.2000); cf. Martin v. Nickels and Dimes, Inc., 804 F.Supp. 83, 84-85 (D.Haw.1992) (Ninth Circuit rule requires that fee request be filed in the appellate court, which may be sub | 1 | 1 |
Dickinson v. Indiana State Election Boardgreen1 sentence2002See, e.g., New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry, 94 F.Supp.2d 465, 470-73 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Dickinson v. Indiana State Election Bd., 817 F.Supp. 737, 750 (S.D.Ind.1992); Spear v. Town of West Hartford, 789 F.Supp. 80, 82 (D.Conn.1992); Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akron, 604 F.Supp. 1275, 1284 (N.D.Ohio 1985); but see U & I Sanitation v. City of Columbus, 112 F.Supp.2d 902, 906 (D.Neb.2000); cf. Martin v. Nickels and Dimes, Inc., 804 F.Supp. 83, 84-85 (D.Haw.1992) (Ninth Circuit rule requires that fee request be filed in the appellate court, which may be sub | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Bert Samuel Stefansongreen2 sentences1996United States v. Loyd, 721 F.2d 331, 333 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Stefanson, 648 F.2d 1231, 1235 (9th Cir.1981) (citations omitted) (emphasis added)). 1996United States v. Loyd, 721 F.2d 331, 333 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Stefanson, 648 F.2d 1231, 1235 (9th Cir.1981) (citations omitted) (emphasis added)). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. David Loyd, William Harrison Hood, A/K/A Wayne Tabone, A/K/A Billie Wooten, Donald Lewis Canup, James Douglas Humegreen2 sentences1996United States v. Loyd, 721 F.2d 331, 333 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Stefanson, 648 F.2d 1231, 1235 (9th Cir.1981) (citations omitted) (emphasis added)). 1996United States v. Loyd, 721 F.2d 331, 333 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Stefanson, 648 F.2d 1231, 1235 (9th Cir.1981) (citations omitted) (emphasis added)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
U & I SANITATION v. City of Columbusgreen1 sentence2002See, e.g., New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry, 94 F.Supp.2d 465, 470-73 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Dickinson v. Indiana State Election Bd., 817 F.Supp. 737, 750 (S.D.Ind.1992); Spear v. Town of West Hartford, 789 F.Supp. 80, 82 (D.Conn.1992); Akron Center for Reproductive Health v. City of Akron, 604 F.Supp. 1275, 1284 (N.D.Ohio 1985); but see U & I Sanitation v. City of Columbus, 112 F.Supp.2d 902, 906 (D.Neb.2000); cf. Martin v. Nickels and Dimes, Inc., 804 F.Supp. 83, 84-85 (D.Haw.1992) (Ninth Circuit rule requires that fee request be filed in the appellate court, which may be sub | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crosby v. State of Hawai'i Department of Budget & Finance
green
1 sentence2022For instance, in her declaration, 8 In Crosby, the Hawai#i Supreme Court addressed the burden of proof in establishing a causal connection between alleged retaliation and the plaintiff's whistle blowing, stating "[t]he HWPA's legislative history indicates that the legislature intended that the required burden of proof be similar to that utilized in traditional labor management relations discharge cases[,]" and referencing the burden under the National Labor Relations Act. 76 Hawai#i at 342, 876 P.2d at 1310 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
United States v. Grubbs
green
2 sentences2015In rejecting the Ninth Circuit’s analysis, the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment “specifies only two matters that must be ‘particularly describ[ed]’ in the warrant: ‘the place to be searched’ and ‘the persons or things to be seized.’ ” Id. at 97 , 126 S.Ct. 1494 (brackets in original). 2015In rejecting the Ninth Circuit’s analysis, the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment “specifies only two matters that must be ‘particularly describ[ed]’ in the warrant: ‘the place to be searched’ and ‘the persons or things to be seized.’ ” Id. at 97 , 126 S.Ct. 1494 (brackets in original). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Abbott Sekaquaptewa, Etc. v. Peter MacDonald Etc., Griffin B. Bell, Etc.
green
1 sentence2014The Ninth Circuit’s analysis and application of the Forgay doctrine to a partition decree in Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 575 F.2d 239 (9th Cir.1978), however, is helpful to our present jurisdictional query and supports this court’s conclusion that an order confirming a partition sale is appealable under the Forgay doctrine. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
cluster 744131
green
2 sentences2006The majority relies on the Ninth Circuit's analysis in Premo, 119 F.3d at 770 , to conclude that the State has " implicitly surrendered its sovereign immunity to suits in federal courts" for violations of the Hawai`i RSA. 2006The majority relies on the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Premo, 119 F.3d at 770 , to conclude that the State has “implicitly surrendered its sovereign immunity to suits in federal courts” for violations of the Hawaii RSA. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Paul v. Reynaldo D. Graulty
green
1 sentence2005Ninth Circuit’s standard in the instant ease, nevertheless the [circuit] [c]ourt erred in its appli *436 cation of that standard.” See Torrisi and Graulty, supra note 17 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1982Six questions relating to the interpretation and effect of our decision in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 54 Haw. 174 , 504 P.2d 1330 , aff'd on rehearing, 55 Haw. 260 , 517 P.2d 26 (1973), appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and cert. denied, 417 U.S. 962 (1974) (hereinafter McBryde), have been certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit under rule 20 of this court which permits us to answer state law questions determinative of a cause before the Supreme Court of the United States or any court of appeals of the United States. 1982Six questions relating to the interpretation and effect of our decision in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 54 Haw. 174 , 504 P.2d 1330 , aff'd on rehearing, 55 Haw. 260 , 517 P.2d 26 (1973), appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and cert. denied, 417 U.S. 962 (1974) (hereinafter McBryde), have been certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit under rule 20 of this court which permits us to answer state law questions determinative of a cause before the Supreme Court of the United States or any court of appeals of the United States. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. Robinson
green
2 sentences1982Six questions relating to the interpretation and effect of our decision in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 54 Haw. 174 , 504 P.2d 1330 , aff'd on rehearing, 55 Haw. 260 , 517 P.2d 26 (1973), appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and cert. denied, 417 U.S. 962 (1974) (hereinafter McBryde), have been certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit under rule 20 of this court which permits us to answer state law questions determinative of a cause before the Supreme Court of the United States or any court of appeals of the United States. 1982Six questions relating to the interpretation and effect of our decision in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 54 Haw. 174 , 504 P.2d 1330 , aff'd on rehearing, 55 Haw. 260 , 517 P.2d 26 (1973), appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and cert. denied, 417 U.S. 962 (1974) (hereinafter McBryde), have been certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit under rule 20 of this court which permits us to answer state law questions determinative of a cause before the Supreme Court of the United States or any court of appeals of the United States. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Dowell v. Utah
green
1 sentence1982Six questions relating to the interpretation and effect of our decision in McBryde Sugar Co. v. Robinson, 54 Haw. 174 , 504 P.2d 1330 , aff'd on rehearing, 55 Haw. 260 , 517 P.2d 26 (1973), appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and cert. denied, 417 U.S. 962 (1974) (hereinafter McBryde), have been certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit under rule 20 of this court which permits us to answer state law questions determinative of a cause before the Supreme Court of the United States or any court of appeals of the United States. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.