10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Marriage of Stenzelgreen2 sentences2025Ideally, the support should be fixed so the continuation of both parties’ standard of living can continue, if possible. 908 N.W.2d at 534 (internal citations omitted). 2025See id. (“[I]f the same standard of living cannot be maintained, support should not be fixed at the cost of the standard of living of the payor.”). | 2 | 2 |
Montanick Ex Rel. Montanick v. McMillingreen2 sentences2014See Montanick, 225 Iowa at 455-57 , 280 N.W. at 615 ; see also 4 Eugene McQuillen, The Law of Municipal Corporations § 12:269, at 400-13 (3d ed. rev.vol.2011). 2014See Montanick, 225 Iowa at 455-57 , 280 N.W. at 615 ; see also 4 Eugene McQuillen, The Law of Municipal Corporations § 12:269, at 400-13 (3d ed. rev.vol.2011). | 2 | 2 |
Teggatz v. Ringlebgreen2 sentences2009See Teggatz v. Ringleb, 610 N.W.2d 527, 531 (Iowa 2000) (stating “the amount recovered under the Iowa restitution statute is not treated as a civil judgment”); see also Iowa Code § 910.2 (requiring sentencing court to order restitution for the cost of defense if the defendant is able to pay). 2009See Teggatz v. Ringleb, 610 N.W.2d 527, 531 (Iowa 2000) (stating “the amount recovered under the Iowa restitution statute is not treated as a civil judgment”); see also Iowa Code § 910.2 (requiring sentencing court to order restitution for the cost of defense if the defendant is able to pay). | 2 | 2 |
Channon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.green1 sentence2021“Front pay is a ‘form of relief that assumes the plaintiff would have continued in [his or her] position absent unlawful actions by the defendant.’ ” Channon v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 629 N.W.2d 835, 848 (Iowa 2001) (alteration in original) (quoting Eileen Kuklis, Comment, The Future of Front Pay Under the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Will it be Subject to the Damage Caps?, 60 Alb. | 1 | 1 |
Boddie v. Connecticutgreen2 sentences1975The State’s obligations under the Fourteenth Amendment are not simply generalized ones; rather, the State owes to each individual that process which, in light of the values of a free society, can be characterized as due.” (Emphasis supplied.) —401 U.S. at 380, 91 S.Ct. at 787 , 28 L.Ed.2d at 120 . 1975The State’s obligations under the Fourteenth Amendment are not simply generalized ones; rather, the State owes to each individual that process which, in light of the values of a free society, can be characterized as due.” (Emphasis supplied.) —401 U.S. at 380, 91 S.Ct. at 787 , 28 L.Ed.2d at 120 . | 1 | 1 |
Farrington v. Freemangreen2 sentences1972See Farrington v. Freeman, 251 Iowa 18 , 99 N.W.2d 388 (1959); Huffman v. Hill, 245 Iowa 935 , 65 N.W.2d 205 (1954); Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. Nielsen, 215 Iowa 238 , 245 N.W. 278 (1932); F. E. 1972See Farrington v. Freeman, 251 Iowa 18 , 99 N.W.2d 388 (1959); Huffman v. Hill, 245 Iowa 935 , 65 N.W.2d 205 (1954); Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. Nielsen, 215 Iowa 238 , 245 N.W. 278 (1932); F. E. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Giles
green
1 sentence2018In re Marriage of Giles , 338 N.W.2d 544 , 546 (Iowa 1983). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Covey v. Town of Somers
green
2 sentences1975After noting that in Covey v. Town of Somers, 351 U.S. 141 , 76 S.Ct. 724 , 100 L.Ed. 1021 (1956), “The Court expressly rejected an argument that ‘the Fourteenth Amendment does not require the State to take measures in giving notice to an incompetent beyond those deemed sufficient in the case of the ordinary taxpayer’ ”, the Boddie court observed, “Just as a generally valid notice procedure may fail to satisfy due process because of the circumstances of the defendant, so too a cost requirement, valid on its face, may offend due process because it operates to foreclose a particular party’s oppo 1975After noting that in Covey v. Town of Somers, 351 U.S. 141 , 76 S.Ct. 724 , 100 L.Ed. 1021 (1956), “The Court expressly rejected an argument that ‘the Fourteenth Amendment does not require the State to take measures in giving notice to an incompetent beyond those deemed sufficient in the case of the ordinary taxpayer’ ”, the Boddie court observed, “Just as a generally valid notice procedure may fail to satisfy due process because of the circumstances of the defendant, so too a cost requirement, valid on its face, may offend due process because it operates to foreclose a particular party’s oppo | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. Nielsen
neutral
2 sentences1972See Farrington v. Freeman, 251 Iowa 18 , 99 N.W.2d 388 (1959); Huffman v. Hill, 245 Iowa 935 , 65 N.W.2d 205 (1954); Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. Nielsen, 215 Iowa 238 , 245 N.W. 278 (1932); F. E. 1972See Farrington v. Freeman, 251 Iowa 18 , 99 N.W.2d 388 (1959); Huffman v. Hill, 245 Iowa 935 , 65 N.W.2d 205 (1954); Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. Nielsen, 215 Iowa 238 , 245 N.W. 278 (1932); F. E. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Huffman v. Hill
green
2 sentences1972See Farrington v. Freeman, 251 Iowa 18 , 99 N.W.2d 388 (1959); Huffman v. Hill, 245 Iowa 935 , 65 N.W.2d 205 (1954); Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. Nielsen, 215 Iowa 238 , 245 N.W. 278 (1932); F. E. 1972See Farrington v. Freeman, 251 Iowa 18 , 99 N.W.2d 388 (1959); Huffman v. Hill, 245 Iowa 935 , 65 N.W.2d 205 (1954); Armstrong Paving Products, Inc. v. Nielsen, 215 Iowa 238 , 245 N.W. 278 (1932); F. E. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.