Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lochaven Co. v. Master Pools by Schertle, Inc.green1 sentence2026The “cost measure is appropriate unless the cost to repair would be grossly disproportionate to the results to be obtained, or would involve unreasonable economic waste.” Lochaven Co. v. Master Pools by Schertle, Inc., 233 Va. 537, 543 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Mann v. Clowsergreen1 sentence2026Under the cost rule, recovery is based on the “cost of correcting the defects in the [construction].” Id. (alteration in original) (quoting Mann v. Clowser, 190 Va. 887, 903 (1950)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
green
2 sentences1968In affirming the trial court’s sustaining of Aetna’s demurrer, we recognized that Code § 38.1-380 (2) gives an injured person, having an unsatisfied judgment against a tort-feasor, the right to bring an action against the tort-feasor’s insurer, and recognized that Code § 38.1-381 (f) gives the injured person’s uninsured motorist carrier the right to bring an action against the tort-feasor,, but we held that General Accident, the uninsured motorist carrier, was neither subrogated to its insured’s right under Code § 38.1-380 (2) nor could it proceed under Code § 38.1-381 (f) against the tort-fea 1968In affirming the trial court’s sustaining of Aetna’s demurrer, we recognized that Code § 38.1-380 (2) gives an injured person, having an unsatisfied judgment against a tort-feasor, the right to bring an action against the tort-feasor’s insurer, and recognized that Code § 38.1-381 (f) gives the injured person’s uninsured motorist carrier the right to bring an action against the tort-feasor,, but we held that General Accident, the uninsured motorist carrier, was neither subrogated to its insured’s right under Code § 38.1-380 (2) nor could it proceed under Code § 38.1-381 (f) against the tort-fea | 2 | 1968–1968 |
Nichols Const. v. Virginia MacHine Tool
green
1 sentence2026Under the cost rule, recovery is based on the “cost of correcting the defects in the [construction].” Id. (alteration in original) (quoting Mann v. Clowser, 190 Va. 887, 903 (1950)). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Strickland v. Sperry Rand Corp.
neutral
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Challenge Cream & Butter Ass'n v. Parker
green
1 sentence1955In California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Oregon, the courts have expressed views in harmony with our decision in Lucerne, etc. Co. v. Milk Commission, supra. Cf. Challenge Cream & Butter Ass’n. v. Parker, 23 Cal. (2d) 137, 142 P. (2d) 737 , 149 A. L. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.