7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wasserman v. Franklin Countygreen2 sentences2025Therefore, the essential “question whether to overrule a precedent comes down to whether getting the law right is worth the cost to the rule of law of unsettling what had been settled.” Id. 2025But the ultimate question is “whether getting the law right is worth the cost to the rule of law of unsettling what had been settled.” Wasserman, 320 Ga. at 647 (II) 21 We have previously questioned the soundness of DOT’s nondelegation holding. | 3 | 3 |
Premier Health Care Investments, LLC v. Uhs of Anchor, L.Pgreen2 sentences2025See, e.g, Premier Health Care Invs., LLC, 310 Ga. at 49 (3) (f) n.18 (noting that “[s]ome of us have doubts about whether [DOT] was rightly decided,” but applying constitutional avoidance to construe statute to not present nondelegation problem). 72 (B) (1). 2025See, e.g, Premier Health Care Invs., LLC, 310 Ga. at 49 (3) (f) n.18 (noting that “[s]ome of us have doubts about whether [DOT] was rightly decided,” but applying constitutional avoidance to construe statute to not present nondelegation problem). 72 is worth the cost to the rule of law of unsettling what had been settled.” Wasserman, 320 Ga. at 647 (II) (B) (1). | 2 | 2 |
Olevik v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Olevik, 302 Ga. at 245 (2) (c) (iv). 2025We previously have said that “stare decisis carries less weight when our prior precedent involved the interpretation of the 21 Constitution, which is more difficult than statutory interpretation for the legislative process to correct.” Olevik v. State, 302 Ga. 228, 245 (2) (c) (iv) ( 806 SE2d 505 ) (2017) (citing Ga. Dept. of Natural Resources v. Center for a Sustainable Coast, Inc., 294 Ga. 593, 601 (2) ( 755 SE2d 184 ) (2014)). | 2 | 2 |
Georgia Department of Natural Resources v. Center for a Sustainable Coast, Inc.green2 sentences2025We previously have said that “stare decisis carries less weight when our prior precedent involved the interpretation of the 21 Constitution, which is more difficult than statutory interpretation for the legislative process to correct.” Olevik, 302 Ga. at 245 (2) (c) (iv) (citing Ga. Dept. of Natural Resources v. Center for a Sustainable Coast, Inc., 294 Ga. 593, 601 (2) ( 755 SE2d 184 ) (2014)). 2025We previously have said that “stare decisis carries less weight when our prior precedent involved the interpretation of the 21 Constitution, which is more difficult than statutory interpretation for the legislative process to correct.” Olevik, 302 Ga. at 245 (2) (c) (iv) (citing Ga. Dept. of Natural Resources v. Center for a Sustainable Coast, Inc., 294 Ga. 593, 601 (2) ( 755 SE2d 184 ) (2014)). | 2 | 2 |
Stalling v. Stategreen2 sentences2007“An indigent, on appeal, is entitled as a matter of right to a free copy of the transcript of trial court proceedings in which he has been a party.” Stalling v. State, 231 Ga. 37, 38 ( 200 SE2d 121 ) (1973). 2007“An indigent, on appeal, is entitled as a matter of right to a free copy of the transcript of trial court proceedings in which he has been a party.” Stalling v. State, 231 Ga. 37, 38 ( 200 SE2d 121 ) (1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hughes
green
1 sentence1989The State also contends that State v. Hughes, 181 Ga. App. 464 , supra, should be distinguished because the defendant in that case knew Northside Hospital performed the type of blood test he was seeking, and that he knew the cost of the test. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Walker v. Stokes
green
1 sentence1983Id. at 277-78 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.