Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co.green2 sentences2016Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co. , 710 P.2d 480, 482 (Colo. 1985)(Neither this court nor the Panel may “read nonexistent provisions” into the Workers’ Compensation Act.). ¶44 Fifth, the Panel was concerned that the claimants might receive a windfall, a “double recovery with no reduction of any sort in the cost of the claim for the employer.” But this concern was clearly not implicated in this case. 2016And we eannot insert language that would additionally qualify when and how death benefits are to be offset, Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co., 710 P.2d 480, 482 (Colo.1985) (Neither this court nor the Panel may "read nonexistent provisions" into the Workers' Compensation Act.). [44 Fifth, the Panel was concerned that the claimants might receive a windfall, a "double recovery with no reduction of any sort in the cost of the claim for the employer." But this concern was clearly not implicated in this case. | 3 | 3 |
Allen v. Peoplegreen2 sentences1991See Allen v. People, 157 Colo. 582, 590-91 , 404 P.2d 266, 271 (1965) (indigent criminal defendant has the right to appointment of counsel); accord Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 S.Ct. 2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344 , 83 S.Ct. 792, 796 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). 1991See Allen v. People, 157 Colo. 582, 590-91 , 404 P.2d 266, 271 (1965) (indigent criminal defendant has the right to appointment of counsel); accord Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 S.Ct. 2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344 , 83 S.Ct. 792, 796 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). | 2 | 2 |
Argersinger v. Hamlingreen2 sentences1991See Allen v. People, 157 Colo. 582, 590-91 , 404 P.2d 266, 271 (1965) (indigent criminal defendant has the right to appointment of counsel); accord Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 S.Ct. 2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344 , 83 S.Ct. 792, 796 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). 1991See Allen v. People, 157 Colo. 582, 590-91 , 404 P.2d 266, 271 (1965) (indigent criminal defendant has the right to appointment of counsel); accord Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 S.Ct. 2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344 , 83 S.Ct. 792, 796 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). | 2 | 2 |
Prichard v. Liberty Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences2016Co., 84 Cal.App.4th 890 , 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 298, 312-13 (2000) (“The cost claim is not ... a substantive replay of the indemnity issue. 2016Co., 84 Cal.App.4th 890 , 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 298, 312-13 (2000) (“The cost claim is not ... a substantive replay of the indemnity issue. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Citizens and Southern National Bank of Atlanta, Georgiagreen1 sentence2004The court explained that, even “[i]n complex situations that may involve multiple [parties], the ‘plaintiff must prove not only that he or she was not liable for the extra cost in this situation but that the defendant was responsible.’ ” Amelco, supra, 27 Cal.4th at 246 , 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 900 , 38 P.3d at 1131 (quoting Aaen, The Total Cost Method of Calculating Damages in Construction Cases, 22 Pacific L.J. 1185, 1202 (1991)); see also United States v. Citizens & S. Nat’l Bank, 367 F.2d 473 (4th Cir.1966). | 1 | 1 |
Sacharko v. Center Equities Limited Partnershipgreen2 sentences1992Partnership, 2 Conn.App. 439 , 479 A.2d 1219, 1224 (1984) (“The general rule is that all insurers providing primary coverage to an insured are duty bound to defend the insured and will be required to contribute their pro rata share of the cost of defense.”); Cordial Greens Country Club, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. 1992Partnership, 2 Conn.App. 439 , 479 A.2d 1219, 1224 (1984) (“The general rule is that all insurers providing primary coverage to an insured are duty bound to defend the insured and will be required to contribute their pro rata share of the cost of defense.”); Cordial Greens Country Club, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. | 1 | 1 |
CORDIAL GREENS COUNTRY CLUB, INC. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.green2 sentences1992Co., 41 N.Y.2d 996 , 395 N.Y.S.2d 443, 444 , 363 N.E.2d 1178, 1179 (1977) (both insurers obligated to defend since allegations may fall within coverage of each policy); see also St. 1992Co., 41 N.Y.2d 996 , 395 N.Y.S.2d 443, 444 , 363 N.E.2d 1178, 1179 (1977) (both insurers obligated to defend since allegations may fall within coverage of each policy); see also St. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Havensgreen2 sentences1984See United States v. Havens, 446 U.S. 620 , 100 S.Ct. 1912 , 64 L.Ed.2d 559 (1980); United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268 , 98 S.Ct. 1054 , 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978). 1984See United States v. Havens, 446 U.S. 620 , 100 S.Ct. 1912 , 64 L.Ed.2d 559 (1980); United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268 , 98 S.Ct. 1054 , 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gideon v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences1991See Allen v. People, 157 Colo. 582, 590-91 , 404 P.2d 266, 271 (1965) (indigent criminal defendant has the right to appointment of counsel); accord Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 S.Ct. 2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344 , 83 S.Ct. 792, 796 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). 1991See Allen v. People, 157 Colo. 582, 590-91 , 404 P.2d 266, 271 (1965) (indigent criminal defendant has the right to appointment of counsel); accord Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 S.Ct. 2006 , 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 344 , 83 S.Ct. 792, 796 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963). | 2 | 1991–1991 |
Massey v. District Court in & for Tenth Judicial Dist.
green
2 sentences1981A statute is to be construed as a whole so as to give "consistent, harmonious, and sensible effect to all its parts." Massey v. District Court, 180 Colo. 359 , 506 P.2d 128 (1973). 1981A statute is to be construed as a whole so as to give "consistent, harmonious, and sensible effect to all its parts." Massey v. District Court, 180 Colo. 359 , 506 P.2d 128 (1973). | 2 | 1981–1981 |
Insurance Co. Of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.
green
1 sentence2026Co. of N. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 633 F.2d 1212 , 1224-25 (6th Cir. 1980))). 22 ¶ 48 And the course of events here underscores the ease with which claims covered by title insurance can be readily split from other, noncovered claims in the same litigation. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Southern Publishing Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2026Opportunity Comm’n v. S. Publ’g Co., 894 F.2d 785 , 791 (5th Cir. 1990) (observing that the purpose of the complete defense rule is to require the insurer to bear the entire cost of defense when “there is no reasonable means of prorating the costs of defense between the covered and the not-covered items” (quoting Ins. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand Oaks
green
2 sentences2004The court explained that, even “[i]n complex situations that may involve multiple [parties], the ‘plaintiff must prove not only that he or she was not liable for the extra cost in this situation but that the defendant was responsible.’ ” Amelco, supra, 27 Cal.4th at 246 , 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 900 , 38 P.3d at 1131 (quoting Aaen, The Total Cost Method of Calculating Damages in Construction Cases, 22 Pacific L.J. 1185, 1202 (1991)); see also United States v. Citizens & S. Nat’l Bank, 367 F.2d 473 (4th Cir.1966). 2004The court explained that, even “[i]n complex situations that may involve multiple [parties], the ‘plaintiff must prove not only that he or she was not liable for the extra cost in this situation but that the defendant was responsible.’ ” Amelco, supra, 27 Cal.4th at 246 , 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 900 , 38 P.3d at 1131 (quoting Aaen, The Total Cost Method of Calculating Damages in Construction Cases, 22 Pacific L.J. 1185, 1202 (1991)); see also United States v. Citizens & S. Nat’l Bank, 367 F.2d 473 (4th Cir.1966). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Schmidt Construction Co. v. Becker-Johnson Corp.
green
1 sentence2003Co. v. Becker-Johnson Corp., 817 P.2d 625 (Colo.App.1991), and a party requesting costs has no right to a hearing. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Boddie v. Connecticut
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 380 , 91 S.Ct. 780 . 2003Id. at 380 , 91 S.Ct. 780 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
MILLERS'MUT. INS. v. Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence2002Relying on Millers’ Mutual Insurance Ass’n v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co., 618 F.Supp. 301 (D.Colo.1985), Cotter maintains that when all obligated insurers have refused to defend, they should share in the cost of defense under equitable principles. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
United States v. Ceccolini
green
2 sentences1984See United States v. Havens, 446 U.S. 620 , 100 S.Ct. 1912 , 64 L.Ed.2d 559 (1980); United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268 , 98 S.Ct. 1054 , 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978). 1984See United States v. Havens, 446 U.S. 620 , 100 S.Ct. 1912 , 64 L.Ed.2d 559 (1980); United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268 , 98 S.Ct. 1054 , 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.
green
1 sentence1960In one leading case, that of Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co., 11 Cal. (2d) 634, 82 P. (2d) 3 , the Court pointed out that it was unable, at the stage at which the case was presented, to determine whether the defendants’ apprehensions were well founded. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.