Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gen. Serv. Emp. Union v. Elrbgreen2 sentences2000GSEU Local 73 , 285 Ill. 2000GSEU Local 73, 285 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
O'BANNER v. McDonald's Corp.green2 sentences2000However, as the trial court correctly found, plaintiff failed to provide evidence sufficient to satisfy the third element of the doctrine of apparent agency: justifiable reliance by Mr. Butkiewicz on the hospital. "[I]f a principal creates the appearance that someone is his agent, he should not then be permitted to deny the agency if an innocent third party reasonably relies on the apparent agency and is harmed as a result." O'Banner v. McDonald's Corp. , 173 Ill. 2d 208, 213 , 670 N.E.2d 632, 634 (1996), citing Gilbert , 156 Ill. 2d at 523-24 , 622 N.E.2d at 795 . 2000However, as the trial court correctly found, plaintiff failed to provide evidence sufficient to satisfy the third element of the doctrine of apparent agency: justifiable reliance by Mr. Butkiewicz on the hospital. "[I]f a principal creates the appearance that someone is his agent, he should not then be permitted to deny the agency if an innocent third party reasonably relies on the apparent agency and is harmed as a result." O'Banner v. McDonald's Corp. , 173 Ill. 2d 208, 213 , 670 N.E.2d 632, 634 (1996), citing Gilbert , 156 Ill. 2d at 523-24 , 622 N.E.2d at 795 . | 2 | 2 |
City of Chicago v. StubHub, Inc.green1 sentence2013That argument necessarily requires consideration of “ ‘the nature and extent of the problem, the units of government which have the most vital interest in its solution, and the role traditionally played by local and statewide authorities in dealing with it.’ ” Stubhub, Inc., 2011 IL 111127, ¶ 24 (quoting Kalodimos, 103 Ill. 2d at 501 (1984)); see also Scadron, 153 Ill. 2d at 176 . | 1 | 1 |
Kalodimos v. Village of Morton Grovegreen1 sentence2013That argument necessarily requires consideration of “ ‘the nature and extent of the problem, the units of government which have the most vital interest in its solution, and the role traditionally played by local and statewide authorities in dealing with it.’ ” Stubhub, Inc., 2011 IL 111127, ¶ 24 (quoting Kalodimos, 103 Ill. 2d at 501 (1984)); see also Scadron, 153 Ill. 2d at 176 . | 1 | 1 |
Scadron v. City of Des Plainesgreen1 sentence2013That argument necessarily requires consideration of “ ‘the nature and extent of the problem, the units of government which have the most vital interest in its solution, and the role traditionally played by local and statewide authorities in dealing with it.’ ” Stubhub, Inc., 2011 IL 111127, ¶ 24 (quoting Kalodimos, 103 Ill. 2d at 501 (1984)); see also Scadron, 153 Ill. 2d at 176 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Pollock
green
2 sentences2014It states: “When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict on appeal, the relevant inquiry is ‘whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact 20 could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Id. ¶ 69 The third element is the test set out by the court for the evidence necessary to establish Pollock’s accountability for murder: “Having concluded that there is no evidence to support a finding that defendant was present when the aggravated battery [by Scott] took place, the inte 2014It states: “When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict on appeal, the relevant inquiry is ‘whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact 20 could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Id. ¶ 69 The third element is the test set out by the court for the evidence necessary to establish Pollock’s accountability for murder: “Having concluded that there is no evidence to support a finding that defendant was present when the aggravated battery [by Scott] took place, the inte | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Gilbert v. Sycamore Municipal Hospital
green
2 sentences2000However, as the trial court correctly found, plaintiff failed to provide evidence sufficient to satisfy the third element of the doctrine of apparent agency: justifiable reliance by Mr. Butkiewicz on the hospital. "[I]f a principal creates the appearance that someone is his agent, he should not then be permitted to deny the agency if an innocent third party reasonably relies on the apparent agency and is harmed as a result." O'Banner v. McDonald's Corp. , 173 Ill. 2d 208, 213 , 670 N.E.2d 632, 634 (1996), citing Gilbert , 156 Ill. 2d at 523-24 , 622 N.E.2d at 795 . 2000However, as the trial court correctly found, plaintiff failed to provide evidence sufficient to satisfy the third element of the doctrine of apparent agency: justifiable reliance by Mr. Butkiewicz on the hospital. "[I]f a principal creates the appearance that someone is his agent, he should not then be permitted to deny the agency if an innocent third party reasonably relies on the apparent agency and is harmed as a result." O'Banner v. McDonald's Corp. , 173 Ill. 2d 208, 213 , 670 N.E.2d 632, 634 (1996), citing Gilbert , 156 Ill. 2d at 523-24 , 622 N.E.2d at 795 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Swieton v. Landoch
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 299-300 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Imig v. Beck
green
1 sentence1986Imig v. Beck (4th Dist. 1985), 137 Ill. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Menconi v. Davison
green
1 sentence1985App. 2d 1 , 225 N.E.2d 139 .) The issue presented on the cross-appeal is whether Thomas Fisher retained sufficient assets following the transfer so that the third element of the test for conveyances fraudulent in law has not been established. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.