Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Bagleygreen2 sentences2011Evidence is "prejudicial" or "material" "`if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'" Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433-34 , 115 S.Ct. 1555 (quoting Bagley, 473 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 (opinion of Blackmun, J.)). 2011Evidence is "prejudicial" or "material" "`if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'" Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433-34 , 115 S.Ct. 1555 (quoting Bagley, 473 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 (opinion of Blackmun, J.)). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ironworkers District Council v. University of Washington Board of Regents
neutral
2 sentences2014Both Ironworkers District Council of the Pacific Northwest v. University of Washington Board of Regents, 93 Wn. 2014Both Ironworkers District Council of the Pacific Northwest v. University of Washington, 93 Wn. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Kyles v. Whitley
green
2 sentences2011Evidence is "prejudicial" or "material" "`if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'" Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433-34 , 115 S.Ct. 1555 (quoting Bagley, 473 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 (opinion of Blackmun, J.)). 2011Evidence is "prejudicial" or "material" "`if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'" Kyles, 514 U.S. at 433-34 , 115 S.Ct. 1555 (quoting Bagley, 473 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 3375 (opinion of Blackmun, J.)). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Benn
green
2 sentences2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wash.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). [5] *167 ¶ 35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady , "`[t]he terms "material" and "prejudicial" are used interchangeably....'" United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n. 12 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n. 9 (9th Cir.2002)). 2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wn.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). 5 ¶35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady, “ ‘[t]he terms “material” and “prejudicial” are used interchangeably ....’” United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n.12 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n.9 (9th Cir. 2002)). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Benn
green
2 sentences2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wash.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). [5] *167 ¶ 35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady , "`[t]he terms "material" and "prejudicial" are used interchangeably....'" United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n. 12 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n. 9 (9th Cir.2002)). 2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wn.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). 5 ¶35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady, “ ‘[t]he terms “material” and “prejudicial” are used interchangeably ....’” United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n.12 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n.9 (9th Cir. 2002)). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Gary Benn v. John Lambert, Superintendent of the Washington State Penitentiary
green
2 sentences2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wash.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). [5] *167 ¶ 35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady , "`[t]he terms "material" and "prejudicial" are used interchangeably....'" United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n. 12 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n. 9 (9th Cir.2002)). 2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wn.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). 5 ¶35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady, “ ‘[t]he terms “material” and “prejudicial” are used interchangeably ....’” United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n.12 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n.9 (9th Cir. 2002)). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
United States v. Price
green
2 sentences2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wash.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). [5] *167 ¶ 35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady , "`[t]he terms "material" and "prejudicial" are used interchangeably....'" United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n. 12 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n. 9 (9th Cir.2002)). 2011Restraint of Benn, 134 Wn.2d 868, 916 , 952 P.2d 116 (1998). 5 ¶35 With respect the third element of a claim under Brady, “ ‘[t]he terms “material” and “prejudicial” are used interchangeably ....’” United States v. Price, 566 F.3d 900 , 911 n.12 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040 , 1053 n.9 (9th Cir. 2002)). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
green
2 sentences2007Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wash.App. 845, 853-54 , 991 P.2d 1182 , review denied, 141 Wash.2d 1017 , 10 P.3d 1071 (2000); Campbell v. State, 129 Wash.App. 10, 20 , 118 P.3d 888 (2005), review denied, 157 Wash.2d 1002 , 136 P.3d 758 (2006). ¶ 18 Mr. Davis reported the "Buckwheat" comment by Mr. Klein. 2007Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wn. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Plano v. City of Renton
green
1 sentence2025McGrath rejects the City’s suggestion that “no fee of any kind” is limited to areas that are “permanent[ly] fee-generating,” relying on Plano v. City of Renton, 103 Wn. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Currier v. Northland Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2023Causal link Again, the third element for a claim of retaliation is whether a jury could find a causal link between the protected activity (Wilson telling Duncan not to touch her) and subsequent adverse action (here, a constructive discharge). “‘Because employers rarely will reveal they are motivated by retaliation, plaintiffs ordinarily must resort to circumstantial evidence to demonstrate retaliatory purpose.’” Currier, 182 Wn. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Plein v. Lackey
green
1 sentence2019App. at 406 (quoting Plein, 149 Wn.2d at 227 ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
D. Ryan And Rhonda Patrick, Apps v. Wells Fargo
green
1 sentence2019Finally, with regard to the third element of waiver, it is undisputed that Miller “failed to bring an action to obtain a court order enjoining the sale.” Patrick, 196 Wn. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Thiefault
green
1 sentence2007Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wash.App. 845, 853-54 , 991 P.2d 1182 , review denied, 141 Wash.2d 1017 , 10 P.3d 1071 (2000); Campbell v. State, 129 Wash.App. 10, 20 , 118 P.3d 888 (2005), review denied, 157 Wash.2d 1002 , 136 P.3d 758 (2006). ¶ 18 Mr. Davis reported the "Buckwheat" comment by Mr. Klein. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Chavez v. Department of Labor and Industries
neutral
1 sentence2007Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wash.App. 845, 853-54 , 991 P.2d 1182 , review denied, 141 Wash.2d 1017 , 10 P.3d 1071 (2000); Campbell v. State, 129 Wash.App. 10, 20 , 118 P.3d 888 (2005), review denied, 157 Wash.2d 1002 , 136 P.3d 758 (2006). ¶ 18 Mr. Davis reported the "Buckwheat" comment by Mr. Klein. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
green
1 sentence2007Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wash.App. 845, 853-54 , 991 P.2d 1182 , review denied, 141 Wash.2d 1017 , 10 P.3d 1071 (2000); Campbell v. State, 129 Wash.App. 10, 20 , 118 P.3d 888 (2005), review denied, 157 Wash.2d 1002 , 136 P.3d 758 (2006). ¶ 18 Mr. Davis reported the "Buckwheat" comment by Mr. Klein. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Campbell v. State
green
1 sentence2007Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wash.App. 845, 853-54 , 991 P.2d 1182 , review denied, 141 Wash.2d 1017 , 10 P.3d 1071 (2000); Campbell v. State, 129 Wash.App. 10, 20 , 118 P.3d 888 (2005), review denied, 157 Wash.2d 1002 , 136 P.3d 758 (2006). ¶ 18 Mr. Davis reported the "Buckwheat" comment by Mr. Klein. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Campbell v. State
green
1 sentence2007Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 98 Wash.App. 845, 853-54 , 991 P.2d 1182 , review denied, 141 Wash.2d 1017 , 10 P.3d 1071 (2000); Campbell v. State, 129 Wash.App. 10, 20 , 118 P.3d 888 (2005), review denied, 157 Wash.2d 1002 , 136 P.3d 758 (2006). ¶ 18 Mr. Davis reported the "Buckwheat" comment by Mr. Klein. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.