10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meredith v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Meredith v. State, 906 N.E.2d 867, 870-73 (Ind. 2009). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Russell v. Russell
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 517 . 2016Id. at 517 . | 2 | 2016–2019 |
Value World Inc. of Indiana v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development
green
1 sentence2014In Value World Inc. of Ind. v. Review Bd. of Ind. Dep’t of Workforce Dev., 927 N.E.2d 945 (Ind.Ct.App.2010), this court observed that a presumption of law is not evidence and should not be weighed as if it has evidentiary value. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Howard Justice v. American Family Insurance Company
green
1 sentence2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Change to the Established Water Level of Lake of the Woods v. Ralston
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Thomas v. State
green
1 sentence2003Thomas, 580 N.E.2d at 226 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Foster v. State
green
1 sentence2000“Thus, Foster was not only afforded an opportunity for a meaningful *255 consultation, an actual consultation transpired.” Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Doperalski v. City of Michigan City
green
1 sentence1994In Doperalski v. City of Michigan City (1993), Ind.App., 619 N.E.2d 584, 586 , this Court observed that the requirement for public hearings was equally applicable to disciplinary actions pursuant to IND.CODE § 36-8-3-4 (1989 Supp.), which is the provision construed herein. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Daugherty v. Fuller Engineering Service Corp.
green
2 sentences1994In Daugherty v. Fuller Engineering (1993), Ind.App., 615 N.E.2d 476 , this court observed that the factors relevant to the issue of control include: 1. right to discharge; 2. mode of payment; 3. supplying tools or equipment; 4. a belief by the parties that a master-servant relationship exists; 5. control over the means used or the result reached; 6. the length of employment; and 7. establishing work boundaries. 1994In Daugherty v. Fuller Engineering (1993), Ind. App., 615 N.E.2d 476 , this court observed that the factors relevant to the issue of control include: 1. right to discharge; 2. mode of payment; 3. supplying tools or equipment; 4. a belief by the parties that a master-servant relationship exists; 5. control over the means used or the result reached; 6. the length of employment; and 7. establishing work boundaries. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.