Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.green2 sentences2015The Court observed that the clause did not broadly declare that pregnant employees needed to be treated “the ‘same’ as ‘any other persons.’ ” Id. at-, 135 S.Ct. at 1350 , 191 L.Ed.2d at 294 (majority opinion). 2015The Court observed that the clause did not broadly declare that pregnant employees needed to be treated “the ‘same’ as ‘any other persons.’ ” Id. at-, 135 S.Ct. at 1350 , 191 L.Ed.2d at 294 (majority opinion). | 1 | 1 |
U.S. Bank v. Barbourgreen1 sentence2010In U.S. Bank v. Barbour, the court observed that under rule 1.420, “The failure to start at a zero balance may merely define and limit the bank’s proof.” 770 N.W.2d 350, 354 (Iowa 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.green2 sentences1993The United States Supreme Court’s most recent guidance on the application of the filed tariff doctrine in the antitrust context appeared in Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, 476 U.S. 409, 423 , 106 S.Ct. 1922, 1930 , 90 L.Ed.2d 413, 426 (1986). 1993The United States Supreme Court’s most recent guidance on the application of the filed tariff doctrine in the antitrust context appeared in Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, 476 U.S. 409, 423 , 106 S.Ct. 1922, 1930 , 90 L.Ed.2d 413, 426 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Kimmel v. Iowa Realty Co., Inc.green2 sentences1988In Kimmel v. Iowa Realty Co., Inc., 339 N.W.2d 374, 384 (Iowa 1983), the court observed the rule in Holcomb must be read in conjunction with the rule that malice sufficient to justify exemplary damages may be either actual or legal malice. 1988The court stated: “To establish legal malice it need only be shown that wrongful or illegal conduct was committed or continued with a reckless disregard at another’s rights.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Moser
green
2 sentences2007In that case, the Court observed that the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to “unmixed questions of law.” Id. at 242 , 45 S. Ct. at 67 , 69 L. 2007In that case, the Court observed that the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to “unmixed questions of law.” Id. at 242 , 45 S. Ct. at 67 , 69 L. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Schmerber v. California
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 771 , 86 S.Ct. at 1836 , 16 L.Ed.2d at 920 . 1996Id. at 771 , 86 S.Ct. at 1836 , 16 L.Ed.2d at 920 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
City of Kirkwood, a Municipal Corporation v. Union Electric Company, a Corporation
green
1 sentence1993The court observed that the doctrine, which “ensures conformity of rates as between customers[,] should not give an unfair advantage to a utility in its dealings with its competitors.” Id. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.