Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baptist Physicians Lexington, Inc. v. New Lexington Clinic, P.S.C.green2 sentences2025Baptist Physicians Lexington, Inc. v. New Lexington Clinic, P.S.C., 436 S.W.3d 189, 193 (Ky. 2013), as modified (Feb. 20, 2014). -10- Kit stated in her pleadings, which she never amended,6 only that the joint tenancy created a fiduciary duty. 2025Baptist Physicians Lexington, Inc. v. New Lexington Clinic, P.S.C., 436 S.W.3d 189, 193 (Ky. 2013), as modified (Feb. 20, 2014). -10- Kit stated in her pleadings, which she never amended,6 only that the joint tenancy created a fiduciary duty. | 2 | 2 |
Johnson v. Colemangreen1 sentence2024We are a notice pleading jurisdiction but “the simplification and liberality extend[ed] to the manner of stating a case . . . are not so great as to obviate the necessity of stating the elements of a cause of action or defense, as the case may be.” Johnson v. Coleman, 288 S.W.2d 348, 349 (Ky. 1956). | 1 | 1 |
Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P. v. Preferred Automotive Services, Inc.green1 sentence2024The elements of a breach of fiduciary duty claim are: “(1) the defendant owes a fiduciary duty to the plaintiff; (2) the defendant breached that duty; and (3) the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach.” Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P. v. Preferred Automotive Services, Inc., 514 S.W.3d 537, 546 (Ky. App. 2016) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Middleton v. Sampeygreen1 sentence2024Middleton v. Sampey, 522 S.W.3d 875, 878 (Ky. App. 2017). | 1 | 1 |
Linda Holt v. John Griffingreen1 sentence2023Osborn v. Griffin, 865 F.3d 417, 437 (6th Cir. 2017). | 1 | 1 |
Motient Corp. v. Donderogreen1 sentence2019The facts of Lawrence’s breach of fiduciary duty claim do not “parallel” the facts of his legal malpractice claim; the facts giving rise to the alleged various instances of deficient performance on the part of Bingham in representing Lawrence in his criminal case have nothing to do with the facts giving rise to Bingham allegedly 34 In re Piper, 244 F.3d at 1301 . 33 Id. at 1302 . 36 Motient Corp. v. Dondero, 269 S.W.3d 78, 83 (Tex. App. 2008) (citing Agrilectric Power Partners, Ltd. v. Gen. | 1 | 1 |
Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc.green2 sentences2013We recognized in Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc., 258 Va. 140, 151 , 515 S.E.2d 277, 284 (1999) that “Code § 13.1.690(A) does not abrogate the common law duties of a director.” However, the protection of § 13.1-690(0 applies only to acts “taken as a director, or any failure to take any action,” and is confined to the exercise of business judgment on behalf of the corporation. 2013We recognized in Willard v. Moneta Building Supply, Inc., 258 Va. 140, 151 , 515 S.E.2d 277, 284 (1999) that “Code § 13.1.690(A) does not abrogate the common law duties of a director.” However, the protection of § 13.1-690(0 applies only to acts “taken as a director, or any failure to take any action,” and is confined to the exercise of business judgment on behalf of the corporation. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Abbott v. Chesley
green
2 sentences2016In Abbott v. Chesley, 413 S.W.3d 589 (Ky. 2013), we determined that the circuit court properly entered summary judgment against Cunningham, Gallion, and Mills on the breach of fiduciary duty claim. 2016In Abbott v. Chesley, 413 S.W.3d 589 (Ky.2013), we determined that the circuit court properly entered summary judgment against Cunningham, Gal-lion, and Mills on the breach of fiduciary duty claim. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics Corp. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences2019The facts of Lawrence’s breach of fiduciary duty claim do not “parallel” the facts of his legal malpractice claim; the facts giving rise to the alleged various instances of deficient performance on the part of Bingham in representing Lawrence in his criminal case have nothing to do with the facts giving rise to Bingham allegedly 34 In re Piper, 244 F.3d at 1301 . 33 Id. at 1302 . 36 Motient Corp. v. Dondero, 269 S.W.3d 78, 83 (Tex. App. 2008) (citing Agrilectric Power Partners, Ltd. v. Gen. 2019The facts of Lawrence’s breach of fiduciary duty claim do not “parallel” the facts of his legal malpractice claim; the facts giving rise to the alleged various instances of deficient performance on the part of Bingham in representing Lawrence in his criminal case have nothing to do with the facts giving rise to Bingham allegedly 34 In re Piper, 244 F.3d at 1301 . 33 Id. at 1302 . 36 Motient Corp. v. Dondero, 269 S.W.3d 78, 83 (Tex. App. 2008) (citing Agrilectric Power Partners, Ltd. v. Gen. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Hoskins v. Maricle
green
1 sentence2019To prevail under the second class of writs, McBrayer must show “that the lower court is acting or is about to act erroneously . . . and there exists no adequate remedy by appeal or otherwise and great injustice and irreparable injury will result if the petition is not granted.” Hoskins, 150 S.W.3d at 10 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.