Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Louisiana opinions name it 3 courts 1961–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ryder v. United States
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 777 (quoting Ryder v. United States, 515 U.S. 177, 180 , 115 S.Ct. 2031, 2034 , 132 L.Ed.2d 136 (1995)). 2006Id. at 777 (quoting Ryder v. United States, 515 U.S. 177, 180 , 115 S.Ct. 2031, 2034 , 132 L.Ed.2d 136 (1995)). | 5 | 2001–2006 |
State v. Hargis
green
2 sentences2010This is from considerations of public policy. `The de facto doctrine was introduced into the law as a matter of policy and necessity to protect the interests of the public and individuals, where those interests were involved in the official acts of persons exercising the duties of an office, without being lawful officers. 22 R.C.L. s 307, p. 589. `And the acts of an officer de facto are as valid and effectual where they concern the public or the rights of third persons, until his title to the office is adjudged insufficient, as though he were an officer de jure. 46 C.J. s 378, p. 1060.' And in 2010This is from considerations of public policy. `The de facto doctrine was introduced into the law as a matter of policy and necessity to protect the interests of the public and individuals, where those interests were involved in the official acts of persons exercising the duties of an office, without being lawful officers. 22 R.C.L. s 307, p. 589. `And the acts of an officer de facto are as valid and effectual where they concern the public or the rights of third persons, until his title to the office is adjudged insufficient, as though he were an officer de jure. 46 C.J. s 378, p. 1060.' And in | 2 | 1962–2010 |
State v. Mayeux
green
2 sentences2010This is from considerations of public policy. `The de facto doctrine was introduced into the law as a matter of policy and necessity to protect the interests of the public and individuals, where those interests were involved in the official acts of persons exercising the duties of an office, without being lawful officers. 22 R.C.L. s 307, p. 589. `And the acts of an officer de facto are as valid and effectual where they concern the public or the rights of third persons, until his title to the office is adjudged insufficient, as though he were an officer de jure. 46 C.J. s 378, p. 1060.' And in 2010This is from considerations of public policy. `The de facto doctrine was introduced into the law as a matter of policy and necessity to protect the interests of the public and individuals, where those interests were involved in the official acts of persons exercising the duties of an office, without being lawful officers. 22 R.C.L. s 307, p. 589. `And the acts of an officer de facto are as valid and effectual where they concern the public or the rights of third persons, until his title to the office is adjudged insufficient, as though he were an officer de jure. 46 C.J. s 378, p. 1060.' And in | 2 | 1962–2010 |
State v. Stripling
green
2 sentences2026Id., 354 So. 2d at 1300-01 . 9 The application of the de facto doctrine is appropriate even where, as here, the underlying grant of authority is deemed legislatively infirm. 2026Id., 354 So. 2d at 1300-01 . 9 The application of the de facto doctrine is appropriate even where, as here, the underlying grant of authority is deemed legislatively infirm. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. O'REILLY
green
1 sentence2005State v. O’Reilly, 00-2864 at p. 12, 785 So.2d at 777 , citing Ryder v. U.S., 515 U.S. 177, 180 , 115 S.Ct. 2031, 2034 , 132 L.Ed.2d 136 (1995). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Citizens Bank v. Bry
neutral
1 sentence1986The doctrine was applied as early as 1848 in Citizens' Bank v. Bry, 3 La.Ann. 630 (La.1848) to uphold the validity of a "notarial protest" presented by a deputy notary. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Boyce v. Trustees of the Towsontown Station of the M. E. Church
neutral
1 sentence1961Boyce v. Towsontown, etc., Church, 1876, 46 Md. 359 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.