Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1948–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. Northfield Insurance Co.green1 sentence2015Co., 132 S.W.3d 90, 95 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.). 8 summary judgment results in a de facto waiver of any such challenge, requiring this Court to affirm the trial court’s judgment.42 As for Appellant’s assertions concerning the trial court’s purported failure to enter a default judgment in her favor, this Court should reject those arguments for the following reasons: First, because Appellant failed to timely request a default judgment against Appellees and failed to afford the trial court an opportunity to rule on any such request, Appellant failed to preserve error. | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Appeal of Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Ass'ngreen2 sentences1995Payne v. Bracken, 90 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Civ.App.—1936), aff 'd, 131 Tex, 394, 115 S.W.2d 903 (1938); see also People v. Zimbelman, 194 Colo. 384 , 572 P.2d 830, 832 (1977); Appeal of Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Association, 5 Kan.App.2d 787 , 625 P.2d 11, 16 (1981). 1995Payne v. Bracken, 90 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Civ.App.—1936), aff 'd, 131 Tex, 394, 115 S.W.2d 903 (1938); see also People v. Zimbelman, 194 Colo. 384 , 572 P.2d 830, 832 (1977); Appeal of Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Association, 5 Kan.App.2d 787 , 625 P.2d 11, 16 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Zimbelmangreen2 sentences1995Payne v. Bracken, 90 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Civ.App.—1936), aff 'd, 131 Tex, 394, 115 S.W.2d 903 (1938); see also People v. Zimbelman, 194 Colo. 384 , 572 P.2d 830, 832 (1977); Appeal of Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Association, 5 Kan.App.2d 787 , 625 P.2d 11, 16 (1981). 1995Payne v. Bracken, 90 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Civ.App.—1936), aff 'd, 131 Tex, 394, 115 S.W.2d 903 (1938); see also People v. Zimbelman, 194 Colo. 384 , 572 P.2d 830, 832 (1977); Appeal of Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Association, 5 Kan.App.2d 787 , 625 P.2d 11, 16 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. Bernal
green
1 sentence2002Bernal, 22 S.W.3d at 435 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Payne v. Bracken
green
1 sentence1995Payne v. Bracken, 90 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Civ.App.—1936), aff 'd, 131 Tex, 394, 115 S.W.2d 903 (1938); see also People v. Zimbelman, 194 Colo. 384 , 572 P.2d 830, 832 (1977); Appeal of Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Association, 5 Kan.App.2d 787 , 625 P.2d 11, 16 (1981). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Payne v. Bracken
neutral
1 sentence1995Payne v. Bracken, 90 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Civ.App.—1936), aff 'd, 131 Tex, 394, 115 S.W.2d 903 (1938); see also People v. Zimbelman, 194 Colo. 384 , 572 P.2d 830, 832 (1977); Appeal of Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Association, 5 Kan.App.2d 787 , 625 P.2d 11, 16 (1981). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Manning v. Harlan
green
1 sentence1948As stated in Manning v. Harlan, Mayor, et al., Tex.Civ.App., 122 S.W.2d 704, 708 , writ dismissed, “The foundation stone of this whole doctrine of a de facto officer, as gathered from all the authorities, seems to be that of preventing the public or third persons from being deceived to their hurt by relying in good faith upon the genuineness and validity of acts done by a pseudo officer. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Martin v. Grandview Independent School Dist.
green
1 sentence1948Our conclusions announced in the original opinion are supported by Martin v. Grandview Ind. School District, Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W. 607, 609 , error referred, quoting with approval 22 RCL, p. 589, § 307, as follows: “The de facto doctrine was introduced into the law as a matter of policy and necessity, to protect the interests of the public and individuals, where those interests were involved in the official acts of persons exercising the duties of an office without being lawful officers. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.