Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Graham v. Floridagreen1 sentence2014Id. at 68, citing Roper, 543 US at 569-570 . | 1 | 1 |
Kalin v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchangegreen2 sentences1984See, Kalin v Detroit Automobile Inter-Ins Exchange, 112 Mich App 497 ; 316 NW2d 467 (1982); and Hathcox v Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 ; 282 NW2d 374 (1979), where panels of this Court relied on the rule in *527 Nickerson, supra, that a statutory "occupant” must have, at least, actually occupied the vehicle immediately prior to the accident. 4 The issue of whether a vehicle ceases to be "used as a motor vehicle” within the meaning of the no-fault act, when it functions in another capacity, was recently addressed by this Court in Johnston v Hartford Ins Co, 131 Mich App 349 ; 346 NW2d 1984See, Kalin v Detroit Automobile Inter-Ins Exchange, 112 Mich App 497 ; 316 NW2d 467 (1982); and Hathcox v Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 ; 282 NW2d 374 (1979), where panels of this Court relied on the rule in *527 Nickerson, supra, that a statutory "occupant” must have, at least, actually occupied the vehicle immediately prior to the accident. 4 The issue of whether a vehicle ceases to be "used as a motor vehicle” within the meaning of the no-fault act, when it functions in another capacity, was recently addressed by this Court in Johnston v Hartford Ins Co, 131 Mich App 349 ; 346 NW2d | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roper v. Simmons
green
2 sentences2014To justify this categorical rule, the Court relied on the factors identified in 5 The Court’s basis for prescribing this rule, distinguishing between adult and juvenile offenders for purposes of constitutional analysis, rested on three factors: (1) juveniles, by way of their “lack of maturity,” tend to engage in “impetuous and ill-considered actions,” (2) “juveniles are more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures” because they “have less control . . . over their own environment,” and (3) “the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult.” Ro 2014To justify this categorical rule, the Court relied on the factors identified in 5 The Court’s basis for prescribing this rule, distinguishing between adult and juvenile offenders for purposes of constitutional analysis, rested on three factors: (1) juveniles, by way of their “lack of maturity,” tend to engage in “impetuous and ill-considered actions,” (2) “juveniles are more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures” because they “have less control . . . over their own environment,” and (3) “the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult.” Ro | 3 | 2014–2014 |
In Re Mayfield
green
2 sentences2004In re Mayfield, supra at 230 , 497 N.W.2d 578 . 2004In re Mayfield, supra at 230 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Saffian v. Simmons
green
1 sentence2023Then, in Saffian v Simmons, 477 Mich 8 (2007), the Court held that where an AOM is filed with a medical malpractice complaint, a defendant must timely answer or otherwise file some responsive pleading to the complaint, or else be subject to a default. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Chapple v. National Hardwood Co.
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 298 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
McDanield v. Hemker
green
1 sentence2017McDanield, 268 Mich App at 282-284 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Kreiner v. Fischer
red
2 sentences2017However, in McDanield, the Court relied on factors set forth in Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109 ; 683 NW2d 611 (2004) in concluding that self-imposed restrictions resulting from pain will not establish a residual impairment. 2017However, in McDanield, the Court relied on factors set forth in Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109 ; 683 NW2d 611 (2004) in concluding that self-imposed restrictions resulting from pain will not establish a residual impairment. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Jordan v. Jarvis
green
1 sentence1997The court stated that it did not rely on the new information and, instead, that “the Court relied on the analysis of the case law and general experience in both legal and administrative proceedings in reaching the conclusions set forth in the decision.” See, e.g., Jordan, supra. Therefore, the error, if any, in the expansion of the record before the circuit court was harmless. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual Insurance
green
1 sentence1984See, Kalin v Detroit Automobile Inter-Ins Exchange, 112 Mich App 497 ; 316 NW2d 467 (1982); and Hathcox v Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 ; 282 NW2d 374 (1979), where panels of this Court relied on the rule in *527 Nickerson, supra, that a statutory "occupant” must have, at least, actually occupied the vehicle immediately prior to the accident. 4 The issue of whether a vehicle ceases to be "used as a motor vehicle” within the meaning of the no-fault act, when it functions in another capacity, was recently addressed by this Court in Johnston v Hartford Ins Co, 131 Mich App 349 ; 346 NW2d | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Hathcox v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences1984See, Kalin v Detroit Automobile Inter-Ins Exchange, 112 Mich App 497 ; 316 NW2d 467 (1982); and Hathcox v Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 ; 282 NW2d 374 (1979), where panels of this Court relied on the rule in *527 Nickerson, supra, that a statutory "occupant” must have, at least, actually occupied the vehicle immediately prior to the accident. 4 The issue of whether a vehicle ceases to be "used as a motor vehicle” within the meaning of the no-fault act, when it functions in another capacity, was recently addressed by this Court in Johnston v Hartford Ins Co, 131 Mich App 349 ; 346 NW2d 1984See, Kalin v Detroit Automobile Inter-Ins Exchange, 112 Mich App 497 ; 316 NW2d 467 (1982); and Hathcox v Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 ; 282 NW2d 374 (1979), where panels of this Court relied on the rule in *527 Nickerson, supra, that a statutory "occupant” must have, at least, actually occupied the vehicle immediately prior to the accident. 4 The issue of whether a vehicle ceases to be "used as a motor vehicle” within the meaning of the no-fault act, when it functions in another capacity, was recently addressed by this Court in Johnston v Hartford Ins Co, 131 Mich App 349 ; 346 NW2d | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Johnston v. Hartford Insurance
green
2 sentences1984See, Kalin v Detroit Automobile Inter-Ins Exchange, 112 Mich App 497 ; 316 NW2d 467 (1982); and Hathcox v Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 ; 282 NW2d 374 (1979), where panels of this Court relied on the rule in *527 Nickerson, supra, that a statutory "occupant” must have, at least, actually occupied the vehicle immediately prior to the accident. 4 The issue of whether a vehicle ceases to be "used as a motor vehicle” within the meaning of the no-fault act, when it functions in another capacity, was recently addressed by this Court in Johnston v Hartford Ins Co, 131 Mich App 349 ; 346 NW2d 1984See, Kalin v Detroit Automobile Inter-Ins Exchange, 112 Mich App 497 ; 316 NW2d 467 (1982); and Hathcox v Liberty Mutual Ins Co, 90 Mich App 511 ; 282 NW2d 374 (1979), where panels of this Court relied on the rule in *527 Nickerson, supra, that a statutory "occupant” must have, at least, actually occupied the vehicle immediately prior to the accident. 4 The issue of whether a vehicle ceases to be "used as a motor vehicle” within the meaning of the no-fault act, when it functions in another capacity, was recently addressed by this Court in Johnston v Hartford Ins Co, 131 Mich App 349 ; 346 NW2d | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.