10 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Estes v. Gibsongreen2 sentences2007The doctrine of negligent entrustment "`ought not to be extended where the party sought to be charged had no control over the machine and the other party actually committing the injurious wrong was the owner, sui juris. '" Sligh, 735 So.2d at 969 (quoting Estes v. Gibson, 257 S.W.2d 604, 607-08 (Ky.Ct.App.1953)). 2005The doctrine of negligent entrustment “‘ought not to be extended where the party sought to be charged had no control over the machine and the other party actually committing the injurious wrong was the owner, sui juris.’” Sligh, 735 So.2d at 969 (quoting Estes v. Gibson, 257 S.W.2d 604, 607-08 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953)). | 2 | 2 |
In re the Adoption of a Minor Childgreen2 sentences2006In re Adoption of a Minor Child, 931 So.2d 566, 578 (Miss. 2006). 5 argues that but for Enterprise’s unlawful action, Cousin would not have been injured. 2006In re Adoption of a Minor Child, 931 So.2d 566, 578 (Miss. 2006). 9 Miss. | 2 | 2 |
Sligh v. First Nat. Bank of Holmes Countygreen2 sentences2007The doctrine of negligent entrustment "`ought not to be extended where the party sought to be charged had no control over the machine and the other party actually committing the injurious wrong was the owner, sui juris. '" Sligh, 735 So.2d at 969 (quoting Estes v. Gibson, 257 S.W.2d 604, 607-08 (Ky.Ct.App.1953)). 2005The doctrine of negligent entrustment “‘ought not to be extended where the party sought to be charged had no control over the machine and the other party actually committing the injurious wrong was the owner, sui juris.’” Sligh, 735 So.2d at 969 (quoting Estes v. Gibson, 257 S.W.2d 604, 607-08 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953)). | 1 | 5 |
Hobbs Automotive, Inc. v. Dorseygreen1 sentence2009Dorsey, 914 So.2d at 167 (91). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilbourn v. Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 969 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 390). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. Cowan
green
2 sentences2010Kitchens relies on Colorado law for the proposition that within the negligent-entrustment doctrine is the duty to terminate the entrustment “if the entrustor acquires information that such an unreasonable risk exists or has come into being after the entrustment and the entrustor has the legal right and ability to end the entrustment.” Casebolt, 829 P.2d at 360 . 2010Id. at 360-61 . ¶ 26. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.