Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baumrucker v. Express Cab Dispatch, Inc.green1 sentence2018See Baumrucker , 2017 IL App (1st) 161278 , ¶¶ 35-50, 416 Ill.Dec. 500 , 84 N.E.3d 482 . ¶ 131 In his cross-appeal, which we chose to address next, plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting the JNOV on count III based on the court's finding of a lack of causation. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.
green
2 sentences2018A panel of this court originally dismissed this appeal but later vacated the dismissal order on Conway's motion. *843 ¶ 8 ANALYSIS ¶ 9 On appeal, Conway argues that the circuit court effectively concluded that, as a matter of law, a negligent entrustment claim is not an "accident" and that the circuit court misapplied our holding in General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co. , 328 Ill. 2018A panel of this court originally dismissed this appeal but later vacated the dismissal order on Conway’s motion. ¶8 ANALYSIS ¶9 On appeal, Conway argues that the circuit court effectively concluded that, as a matter of law, a negligent entrustment claim is not an “accident” and that the circuit court misapplied our holding in General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co., 328 Ill. | 3 | 2018–2018 |
Gant v. L.U. Transport, Inc.
green
2 sentences2020Id. 2020Id. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Ashley v. Scott
green
2 sentences2019Ashley , 266 Ill. 2019Ashley, 266 Ill. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Pelczynski v. J.W. Peters & Sons, Inc.
green
1 sentence2025Id. at 884 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Locasto v. The City of Chicago
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Evans v. Shannon
green
1 sentence2019Evans, 201 Ill. 2d at 434-35 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Pfiel
green
1 sentence2012Pfiel, 304 Ill. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Barth v. Massa
green
1 sentence1993App. 3d 19 , 558 N.E.2d 528 , Teter v. Clemens (1986), 112 Ill. 2d 252 , 492 N.E.2d 1340 , and the Restatement (Second) of Torts §308, at 100 (1965), Robert maintains that an essential element of the negligent entrustment doctrine is lacking. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Teter v. Clemens
green
2 sentences1993App. 3d 19 , 558 N.E.2d 528 , Teter v. Clemens (1986), 112 Ill. 2d 252 , 492 N.E.2d 1340 , and the Restatement (Second) of Torts §308, at 100 (1965), Robert maintains that an essential element of the negligent entrustment doctrine is lacking. 1993App. 3d 19 , 558 N.E.2d 528 , Teter v. Clemens (1986), 112 Ill. 2d 252 , 492 N.E.2d 1340 , and the Restatement (Second) of Torts §308, at 100 (1965), Robert maintains that an essential element of the negligent entrustment doctrine is lacking. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Gorday v. Faris
green
2 sentences1989The court in Gorday v. Faris (Fla. App. 1988), 523 So. 2d 1215 , relied on Blake in a case of first impression in Florida wherein the doctrine of negligent entrustment was applied when the injured party plaintiff was the entrustee. 1989The court in Gorday v. Faris (Fla. App. 1988), 523 So.2d 1215 , relied on Blake in a case of first impression in Florida wherein the doctrine of negligent entrustment was applied when the injured party plaintiff was the entrustee. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Palmer v. Miller
green
2 sentences1986Consider the following: a factual setting where the employer provides defective equipment for the employee to use, resulting in liability on the part of the employee, i.e., a truck with defective brakes; the doctrine under Palmer v. Miller (1942), 380 Ill. 256 , 43 N.E.2d 973 , where the employer, while in a vehicle owned by him but driven by the employee, has a duty to control the operation of the vehicle; and the doctrine of negligent entrustment. 1986Consider the following: a factual setting where the employer provides defective equipment for the employee to use, resulting in liability on the part of the employee, i.e., a truck with defective brakes; the doctrine under Palmer v. Miller (1942), 380 Ill. 256 , 43 N.E.2d 973 , where the employer, while in a vehicle owned by him but driven by the employee, has a duty to control the operation of the vehicle; and the doctrine of negligent entrustment. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.