10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1891–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLCgreen1 sentence2020Our Supreme Court has cautioned that its decisions must be read against their specific facts because “decisional law generally develops incrementally, within the confines of the circumstances of cases as they come before the Court.” Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLC, 57 A.3d 582, 604 (Pa. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Cartergreen1 sentence2015See generally id. at 768-769 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Wallsgreen2 sentences2014Amzu and Terry forbid this mode of analysis. 5 See Arvizu, supra; accord Commonwealth v. Walls, 53 A.3d 889, 894-895 (Pa.Super.2012). 2014Arvizu and Terry forbid this mode of analysis.5 See Arvizu, supra; accord Commonwealth v. Walls, 53 A.3d 889, 894-895 (Pa. Super. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Arvizu
green
2 sentences2014Arvizu and Terry forbid this mode of analysis.5 See Arvizu, supra; accord Commonwealth v. Walls, 53 A.3d 889, 894-895 (Pa. Super. 2012). 2012Id. | 2 | 2012–2014 |
Commonwealth v. Wright
green
2 sentences1988In Commonwealth v. Wright, 508 Pa. 25 , 494 A.2d 354 (1985) the court rejected the argument that an equal protection challenge to the Act implicated a fundamental liberty interest that required the highest level of scrutiny and determined that the proper mode of analysis to be applied by courts when sections of the Act are challenged is to determine whether the classification created by that section of the Act bears a rational relationship to a legitimate legislative objective. 1988In Commonwealth v. Wright, 508 Pa. 25 , 494 A.2d 354 (1985) the court rejected the argument that an equal protection challenge to the Act implicated a fundamental liberty interest that required the highest level of scrutiny and determined that the proper mode of analysis to be applied by courts when sections of the Act are challenged is to determine whether the classification created by that section of the Act bears a rational relationship to a legitimate legislative objective. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady
green
2 sentences1986As recognized by the majority, the seminal case setting forth the mode of analysis under the Commerce Clause is Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 1076 , 51 L.Ed.2d 326 (1977). 1986As recognized by the majority, the seminal case setting forth the mode of analysis under the Commerce Clause is Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 1076 , 51 L.Ed.2d 326 (1977). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
United States v. Watson
green
2 sentences1979Ante, at 418 n. 6, [ 96 S.Ct. 820 ] at 825. . . . 1979Ante, at 418 n. 6, [ 96 S.Ct. 820 ] at 825. . . . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Kohler v. Luckenbaugh
neutral
1 sentence1909Neither the decision nor the opinion is at all inconsistent with the previous ruling of the Supreme Court in Kohler v. Luckenbaugh, 84 Pa. 258 , where it was distinctly declared that the mode pursued in the present case is orderly and regular, notwithstanding the act of 1722. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Kittera's Estate
neutral
1 sentence1904Each creditor or claimant had a right to appear and to be heard, so far as was necessary for the protection of his own interest; and of this proceeding the executor had not the control, nor is he responsible for errors, if any, in the distribution so decreed: Kittera’s Est., 17 Pa. 416 ; Claghorn’s Est., 181 Pa. 600, 606 . | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Estate of Claghorn
neutral
1 sentence1904Each creditor or claimant had a right to appear and to be heard, so far as was necessary for the protection of his own interest; and of this proceeding the executor had not the control, nor is he responsible for errors, if any, in the distribution so decreed: Kittera’s Est., 17 Pa. 416 ; Claghorn’s Est., 181 Pa. 600, 606 . | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Flournoy & Epping v. Lyon & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1891When the cause of aption is sufficiently stated to authorize a recovery ... of any damages, a partial defense, going to a denial of the right to recover a part of the damages claimed, must be availed of and effectuated by motion to strike out the objectionable averments, or by objections to the evidence, and through instructions to the jury.” — Hays v. Anderson, 57 Ala. 375 ; Flournoy v. Lyon, 70 Ala. 308 ; Daughterly v. Telegraph Co., 75 Ala. 168 . 2. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Daughtery v. American Union Telegraph Co.
green
1 sentence1891When the cause of aption is sufficiently stated to authorize a recovery ... of any damages, a partial defense, going to a denial of the right to recover a part of the damages claimed, must be availed of and effectuated by motion to strike out the objectionable averments, or by objections to the evidence, and through instructions to the jury.” — Hays v. Anderson, 57 Ala. 375 ; Flournoy v. Lyon, 70 Ala. 308 ; Daughterly v. Telegraph Co., 75 Ala. 168 . 2. | 1 | 1891–1891 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.