Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1882–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Freeman v. Stategreen2 sentences2012The Williams instruction provided: In criminal law “Alibi” means “elsewhere” or in another place.” It is a mode of defense to a criminal prosecution where the party accused, in 13 instruction could have been more carefully worded so as to more clearly instruct the jury on the issues of burden of proof and reasonable doubt as they pertained to appellant’s alibi defense, we find no error.” We reasoned that the same instruction was quoted with approval by our supreme court in Freeman v. State, 249 Ind. 211 , 231 N.E.2d 246 (1967) and that the other instructions, when read together, provided “stro 2012The Williams instruction provided: In criminal law “Alibi” means “elsewhere” or in another place.” It is a mode of defense to a criminal prosecution where the party accused, in 13 instruction could have been more carefully worded so as to more clearly instruct the jury on the issues of burden of proof and reasonable doubt as they pertained to appellant’s alibi defense, we find no error.” We reasoned that the same instruction was quoted with approval by our supreme court in Freeman v. State, 249 Ind. 211 , 231 N.E.2d 246 (1967) and that the other instructions, when read together, provided “stro | 2 | 3 |
Mayhue v. Sparkmangreen2 sentences2000Rejecting a “pure loss *166 of chance” 7 standard of causation in May-hue, the Court held that Section 323 was the appropriate mode of analysis of a claim for injuries that had been sustained, but which were more likely than not to have occurred even in the absence of any negligence, concluding that standard was the “most consistent with Indiana law.” See id. at 1388-89 . 2000See 653 N.E.2d at 1388-89 . | 1 | 2 |
Matter of Paternity of Humphreygreen1 sentence2002See Matter of Paternity of Humphrey, 583 N.E.2d 133, 134 (Ind.1991) ("Because trial courts must utilize the same mode of analysis whether dividing property or determining support Le., starting with a rebuttable presumption and setting forth reasons for any deviation), we conclude that the same standard of review ought to prevail. | 1 | 1 |
Robert C. Butler v. Jim Rose, Wardengreen2 sentences1996See Butler v. Rose, 686 F.2d 1163 , 1170 n. 6 (6th Cir.1982) (discussing "universal application" of the test). 1996See Butler v. Rose, 686 F.2d 1163 , 1170 n. 6 (6th Cir.1982) (discussing "universal application" of the test). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. State
green
1 sentence2019Edwards, 930 N.E.2d at 50 (quoting Freeman v. State, 231 N.E.2d 246, 250 (Ind. 1967)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences2012Williams, 181 Ind. App. at 529 , 392 N.E.2d at 819 . 2012Williams, 181 Ind. App. at 529 , 392 N.E.2d at 819 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
United States v. Donte Hammond
green
1 sentence2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
In Re the Marriage of Davidson
green
1 sentence1991In Re Marriage of Davidson (1989), Ind. App., 540 N.E.2d 641, 645 . ("Reversal is merited only where the trial court's decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the trial court.") Because trial courts must utilize the same mode of analysis whether dividing property or determining support (i.e., starting with a rebuttable presumption and setting forth reasons for any deviation), we conclude that the same standard of review ought to prevail. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bowen v. Pollard
neutral
1 sentence1882Bowen v. Pollard, 71 Ind. 177 . | 1 | 1882–1882 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.