10 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kraemer v. ZONING BOARD OF WARWICKgreen2 sentences1987Later, in Kraemer v. Zoning Board of Review of Warwick, 100 R.I. 20, 22 , 210 A.2d 650, 651 (1965), the court held that “despite the broad latitude of authority granted therein * * * [the public convenience and welfare language of § 14.2.3 of the ordinance] in effect, constituted a limitation upon the authority of the board to act affirmatively on any application for an exception thereunder.” More recently this court again rejected a challenge to the board’s authority to grant exceptions under § 14.2.3. 1987Later, in Kraemer v. Zoning Board of Review of Warwick, 100 R.I. 20, 22 , 210 A.2d 650, 651 (1965), the court held that “despite the broad latitude of authority granted therein * * * [the public convenience and welfare language of § 14.2.3 of the ordinance] in effect, constituted a limitation upon the authority of the board to act affirmatively on any application for an exception thereunder.” More recently this court again rejected a challenge to the board’s authority to grant exceptions under § 14.2.3. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
CENTER RLTY. CORP. v. Zoning Bd. of Review of Warwick
green
2 sentences1988The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Warwick § 14.2.3 (1987) permits the board "[i]n appropriate cases and subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards to make special exceptions to the terms of this ordinance where the exception is reasonably necessary for the convenience and welfare of the public." The term "reasonably necessary for the convenience and welfare of the public" contained therein has been interpreted in Center Realty Corp. v. Zoning Board of Review of Warwick, 96 R.I. 76 , 189 A.2d 347 (1963). 1988The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Warwick § 14.2.3 (1987) permits the board "[i]n appropriate cases and subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards to make special exceptions to the terms of this ordinance where the exception is reasonably necessary for the convenience and welfare of the public." The term "reasonably necessary for the convenience and welfare of the public" contained therein has been interpreted in Center Realty Corp. v. Zoning Board of Review of Warwick, 96 R.I. 76 , 189 A.2d 347 (1963). | 3 | 1980–1988 |
M.B.T. Construction Corp. v. Edwards
green
2 sentences2010Construction Corp. 528 A.2d at 337 -38 . 2010Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Lindberg's, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review
green
2 sentences2010This district is composed of certain high density areas that are served by both public water and public sewers." Appellants believe Lindberg's Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review of the City of East Providence establishes that a zoning board cannot grant a special use permit in contravention of an ordinance requirement, and argue that Section A (5) is such a requirement. 106 R.I. 667 , 262 A.2d 628 (R.I. 1970). 2010This district is composed of certain high density areas that are served by both public water and public sewers." Appellants believe Lindberg's Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review of the City of East Providence establishes that a zoning board cannot grant a special use permit in contravention of an ordinance requirement, and argue that Section A (5) is such a requirement. 106 R.I. 667 , 262 A.2d 628 (R.I. 1970). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Frank Ansuini, Inc. v. City of Cranston
green
2 sentences2007Ansuini , 107 R.I. at 73 , 264 A.2d at 915 ; Kingsley , 120 R.I. at 359 , 388 A.2d at 359 . 2007Ansuini , 107 R.I. at 73 , 264 A.2d at 915 ; Kingsley , 120 R.I. at 359 , 388 A.2d at 359 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Kingsley v. Miller
green
2 sentences2007Ansuini , 107 R.I. at 73 , 264 A.2d at 915 ; Kingsley , 120 R.I. at 359 , 388 A.2d at 359 . 2007Ansuini , 107 R.I. at 73 , 264 A.2d at 915 ; Kingsley , 120 R.I. at 359 , 388 A.2d at 359 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
DeStefano v. ZONING BD. OF REVIEW, ETC.
green
1 sentence1991DeStefano v. Zoning Board of Review, 122 R.I. 241 , 246, 405 A.2d 1167 , 1170 (1979). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Destefano v. Zoning Board of Review
green
1 sentence1991DeStefano v. Zoning Board of Review, 122 R.I. 241 , 246, 405 A.2d 1167 , 1170 (1979). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Skirvin
green
1 sentence1991Co. Inc., 322 A.2d at 296 ), the court noted that a zoning ordinance provision providing that a legal nonconforming use that is discontinued for more than two years can't be renewed was an attempt by the local legislature to abridge in the ordinance a rule granted by the enabling act, § 45-24-20 (d). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Richardson v. ZONING BD. OF REV. OF CITY OF WARWICK
green
1 sentence1968I. 194, 221 A.2d 460 at 463-64: * * The authority of the zoning board to grant this exception, however, is not free and unfettered. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Clapp v. Ulbrich
green
1 sentence1964Clapp v. Ulbrich, 140 Conn. 637 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.