factual basis requirement (South Dakota) · Go Syfert
← South Dakota issues

factual basis requirement in South Dakota

10 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
Petrilli v. Leapleygreen
sd · 1992 · cited in 2 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1994–2016
2 sentences

1994The lack of a factual basis inquiry does not rise to the level of a miscarriage of justice allowing a collateral attack on the validity of the conviction “to do service for an appeal.” State v. Jacobson, 491 N.W.2d 455, 460 (S.D.1992); Petrilli, supra, 491 N.W.2d at 83, n. 2.

1994The lack of a factual basis inquiry does not rise to the level of a miscarriage of justice allowing a collateral attack on the validity of the conviction “to do service for an appeal.” State v. Jacobson, 491 N.W.2d 455, 460 (S.D.1992); Petrilli, supra, 491 N.W.2d at 83, n. 2.

12
United States v. Timmreckgreen
scotus · 1979 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See United States v. Timmreck, 441 U.S. 780, 783 , 99 S.Ct. 2085, 2087 , 60 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979) (concluding that a failure to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is neither “constitutional nor jurisdictional”); State v. Moeller, 511 N.W.2d 803, 811 (S.D. 1994) (concluding that failure to inquire into the facthal basis for a plea is neither “constitutional nor jurisdictional”); Petrilli v. Leapley, 491 N.W.2d 79 , 83 n. 2 (S.D. 1992) (same).

2016See United States v. Timmreck, 441 U.S. 780, 783 , 99 S.Ct. 2085, 2087 , 60 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979) (concluding that a failure to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is neither “constitutional nor jurisdictional”); State v. Moeller, 511 N.W.2d 803, 811 (S.D. 1994) (concluding that failure to inquire into the facthal basis for a plea is neither “constitutional nor jurisdictional”); Petrilli v. Leapley, 491 N.W.2d 79 , 83 n. 2 (S.D. 1992) (same).

11
State v. Moellergreen
sd · 1994 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See United States v. Timmreck, 441 U.S. 780, 783 , 99 S.Ct. 2085, 2087 , 60 L.Ed.2d 634 (1979) (concluding that a failure to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is neither “constitutional nor jurisdictional”); State v. Moeller, 511 N.W.2d 803, 811 (S.D. 1994) (concluding that failure to inquire into the facthal basis for a plea is neither “constitutional nor jurisdictional”); Petrilli v. Leapley, 491 N.W.2d 79 , 83 n. 2 (S.D. 1992) (same).

11
State v. Janssengreen
sd · 1985 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016State v. Janssen, 371 N.W.2d 353, 356 (S.D.1985) (“a valid and sufficient [indictment] confers subject matter jurisdiction upon the court.”); State v. Osborn, 155 Ind. 385 , 58 N.E. 491, 493 (1900) (“jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the offense charged depends upon the allegations of said indictment or affidavit and information and not upon the actual facts”).

11
State v. Osborngreen
ind · 1900 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016State v. Janssen, 371 N.W.2d 353, 356 (S.D.1985) (“a valid and sufficient [indictment] confers subject matter jurisdiction upon the court.”); State v. Osborn, 155 Ind. 385 , 58 N.E. 491, 493 (1900) (“jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the offense charged depends upon the allegations of said indictment or affidavit and information and not upon the actual facts”).

2016State v. Janssen, 371 N.W.2d 353, 356 (S.D.1985) (“a valid and sufficient [indictment] confers subject matter jurisdiction upon the court.”); State v. Osborn, 155 Ind. 385 , 58 N.E. 491, 493 (1900) (“jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the offense charged depends upon the allegations of said indictment or affidavit and information and not upon the actual facts”).

11
cluster 6904green
· · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007Thus [they] believed that free care or reduced cost care would be provided ... based upon [their] ability to pay....” (Emphasis added.) However, these conclusory statements of belief are not sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. [¶ 39.] To survive a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff “must allege causation with sufficient particularity such that we can determine whether the factual basis for its claim, if proven, could support an inference of proximate cause.” First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp., 27 F.3d 763 , 770 (2d Cir.1994). “ ‘[C]oncluso-ry allegations or legal conclusions masque

11
State v. Jacobsongreen
sd · 1992 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994The lack of a factual basis inquiry does not rise to the level of a miscarriage of justice allowing a collateral attack on the validity of the conviction "to do service for an appeal." State v. Jacobson, 491 N.W.2d 455, 460 (S.D.1992); Petrilli, supra, 491 N.W.2d at 83, n. 2.

1994The lack of a factual basis inquiry does not rise to the level of a miscarriage of justice allowing a collateral attack on the validity of the conviction “to do service for an appeal.” State v. Jacobson, 491 N.W.2d 455, 460 (S.D.1992); Petrilli, supra, 491 N.W.2d at 83, n. 2.

11
Gross v. Solemgreen
sd · 1989 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994See also Gross v. Solem, 446 N.W.2d 49 (S.D.1989); State v. Lownes, supra ; U.S. v. Newman, 912 F.2d 1119 (9th Cir.1990).

1994See also Gross v. Solem, 446 N.W.2d 49 (S.D.1989); State v. Lownes, supra; U.S. v. Newman, 912 F.2d 1119 (9th Cir.1990).

11
State v. Woodsgreen
sd · 1985 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993On page 834 of the record, Judge Bogue said, "Even if I were to find [that the legal test has been met], I would struggle with the factual basis." In State v. Woods, supra , writing for this Court, I expressed: The trial court does not have to instruct on matters not supported or warranted by the evidence.

1993On page 834 of the record, Judge Bogue said, “Even if I were to find [that the legal test has been met], I would struggle with the factual basis.” In State v. Woods, supra, writing for this Court, I expressed: The trial court does not have to instruct on matters not supported or warranted by the evidence.

11
Pablo Carreon v. United Statesgreen
ca7 · 1978 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992Under these circumstances, the Seventh Circuit allowed the defendant’s subsequent collateral attack on the validity of the conviction determining that the failure to conduct a factual basis inquiry constituted a “ ‘fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice.’ ” Id., 578 F.2d at 179 (citation omitted).

1992Under these circumstances, the Seventh Circuit allowed the defendant’s subsequent collateral attack on the validity of the conviction determining that the failure to conduct a factual basis inquiry constituted a “ ‘fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice.’ ” Id., 578 F.2d at 179 (citation omitted).

11
Logan v. Solemgreen
sd · 1987 · cited in 1 South Dakota opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See also Logan v. Solem, 406 N.W.2d 714 (S.D.1987).

1987See also Logan v. Solem, 406 N.W.2d 714 (S.D.1987).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (20)

CaseCitedYears
Spirit Track v. State green
sd · 1978
2 sentences

2007In Gregory v. State, we noted a denial “of acts constituting essential elements of the offense raises further question of whether the defendant fully understood the nature of the offense charged.” Id. [¶ 6.] “The factual basis requirement, codified at SDCL 23A-7-2, is very closely patterned after Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(f).

1987State v. Lashwood, 384 N.W.2d 319 (S.D.1986); Halverson v. State, 372 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1985); Graham v. State, 328 N.W.2d 254 (S.D.1982); Gregory v. State, 325 N.W.2d 297 (S.D.1982); State v. Sutton, 317 N.W.2d 414 (S.D.1982); Spirit Track v. State, 272 N.W.2d 803 (S.D.1978); State v. Doherty, 261 N.W.2d 677 (S.D.1978).

21987–2007
Goodroad v. Solem green
sd · 1987
2 sentences

1989In Good-road, 406 N.W.2d at 145 , we held that the factual predicate of a guilty plea could not be raised in a habeas corpus review: Since the factual basis requirement rests in statute and not the constitution, we would normally not review this claim in a habeas corpus action....

1989In Goodroad, 406 N.W.2d at 145 , we held that the factual predicate of a guilty plea could not be raised in a habeas corpus review: Since the factual basis requirement rests in statute and not the constitution, we would normally not review this claim in a habeas corpus action....

21987–1989
United States v. Cotton green
scotus · 2002
2 sentences

2016Therefore, a failure to comply with the factual basis requirement in SDCL 23A-7-14 (Rule 11(f)) does not deprive the circuit court of jurisdiction over the subject matter alleged in the indictment. [¶ 15.] Subject matter jurisdiction is “the courts’ statutory or constitutional ppwer to adjudicate the case[,]” United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630 , 122 S.Ct. 1781, 1785 , 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002), and whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is determined by, the indictment.

2016Therefore, a failure to comply with the factual basis requirement in SDCL 23A-7-14 (Rule 11(f)) does not deprive the circuit court of jurisdiction over the subject matter alleged in the indictment. [¶ 15.] Subject matter jurisdiction is “the courts’ statutory or constitutional ppwer to adjudicate the case[,]” United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630 , 122 S.Ct. 1781, 1785 , 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002), and whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is determined by, the indictment.

12016–2016
First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp. green
ca1 · 1994
1 sentence

2007Thus [they] believed that free care or reduced cost care would be provided ... based upon [their] ability to pay....” (Emphasis added.) However, these conclusory statements of belief are not sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. [¶ 39.] To survive a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff “must allege causation with sufficient particularity such that we can determine whether the factual basis for its claim, if proven, could support an inference of proximate cause.” First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp., 27 F.3d 763 , 770 (2d Cir.1994). “ ‘[C]oncluso-ry allegations or legal conclusions masque

12007–2007
State v. Schulz green
sd · 1987
1 sentence

2007Thus, to guide our interpretation of SDCL 23A-7-2, we look to the federal courts’ interpretation of Rule 11(f).” Schulz, 409 N.W.2d at 657-58 . [¶ 7.] Nachtigall contends that the trial court accepted his guilty plea without properly finding a factual basis for each element of the offense.

12007–2007
United States v. Erwin Darrell Newman green
ca9 · 1990
2 sentences

1994See also Gross v. Solem, 446 N.W.2d 49 (S.D.1989); State v. Lownes, supra ; U.S. v. Newman, 912 F.2d 1119 (9th Cir.1990).

1994See also Gross v. Solem, 446 N.W.2d 49 (S.D.1989); State v. Lownes, supra; U.S. v. Newman, 912 F.2d 1119 (9th Cir.1990).

11994–1994
State v. Lownes green
sd · 1993
2 sentences

1994See also Gross v. Solem, 446 N.W.2d 49 (S.D.1989); State v. Lownes, supra ; U.S. v. Newman, 912 F.2d 1119 (9th Cir.1990).

1994See also Gross v. Solem, 446 N.W.2d 49 (S.D.1989); State v. Lownes, supra; U.S. v. Newman, 912 F.2d 1119 (9th Cir.1990).

11994–1994
State v. Scholten green
sd · 1989
1 sentence

1993Justice Henderson correctly notes that "the trial court does not have to instruct on matters not supported or warranted by the evidence." Woods, 374 N.W.2d at 96 (emphasis added); Scholten, 445 N.W.2d at 32 .

11993–1993
United States v. Nancy Fels, Theodore Rodriguez, and Scott Williams green
ca7 · 1979
2 sentences

1992The Seventh Circuit has subsequently interpreted Carreon to mean that in a collateral attack “a conviction will be vacated for a Rule 11 violation only if it amounts to ‘a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice.’ ” United States v. Fels, 599 F.2d 142 , 149 n. 5 (7th Cir.1979) (quoting, Carreon, supra).

1992The Seventh Circuit has subsequently interpreted Carreon to mean that in a collateral attack "a conviction will be vacated for a Rule 11 violation only if it amounts to `a fundamental defect which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice.'" United States v. Fels, 599 F.2d 142 , 149 n. 5 (7th Cir.1979) (quoting, Carreon, supra ).

11992–1992
Everitt v. Solem green
sd · 1987
2 sentences

1989More recently, in Everitt v. Solem, 412 N.W.2d 119 (S.D.1987), we reaffirmed this position in a guilty but mentally ill case.

1989More recently, in Everitt v. Solem, 412 N.W.2d 119 (S.D.1987), we reaffirmed this position in a guilty but mentally ill case.

11989–1989
Gregory v. State green
sd · 1982
1 sentence

1987State v. Lashwood, 384 N.W.2d 319 (S.D.1986); Halverson v. State, 372 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1985); Graham v. State, 328 N.W.2d 254 (S.D.1982); Gregory v. State, 325 N.W.2d 297 (S.D.1982); State v. Sutton, 317 N.W.2d 414 (S.D.1982); Spirit Track v. State, 272 N.W.2d 803 (S.D.1978); State v. Doherty, 261 N.W.2d 677 (S.D.1978).

11987–1987
State v. Doherty green
sd · 1978
1 sentence

1987State v. Lashwood, 384 N.W.2d 319 (S.D.1986); Halverson v. State, 372 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1985); Graham v. State, 328 N.W.2d 254 (S.D.1982); Gregory v. State, 325 N.W.2d 297 (S.D.1982); State v. Sutton, 317 N.W.2d 414 (S.D.1982); Spirit Track v. State, 272 N.W.2d 803 (S.D.1978); State v. Doherty, 261 N.W.2d 677 (S.D.1978).

11987–1987
Elroy Lynn Wabasha v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South Dakota green
ca8 · 1982
11987–1987
State v. Lashwood green
sd · 1986
1 sentence

1987State v. Lashwood, 384 N.W.2d 319 (S.D.1986); Halverson v. State, 372 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1985); Graham v. State, 328 N.W.2d 254 (S.D.1982); Gregory v. State, 325 N.W.2d 297 (S.D.1982); State v. Sutton, 317 N.W.2d 414 (S.D.1982); Spirit Track v. State, 272 N.W.2d 803 (S.D.1978); State v. Doherty, 261 N.W.2d 677 (S.D.1978).

11987–1987
Mortweet v. Eliason green
sd · 1983
2 sentences

1987Mayrose v. Fendrich, 347 N.W.2d 585 (S.D.1984); Mortweet v. Eliason, 335 N.W.2d 812 (S.D.1983); Weaver v. Boortz, 301 N.W.2d 673 (S.D.1981).

1987Mayrose v. Fendrich, 347 N.W.2d 585 (S.D.1984); Mortweet v. Eliason, 335 N.W.2d 812 (S.D.1983); Weaver v. Boortz, 301 N.W.2d 673 (S.D.1981).

11987–1987
Mayrose v. Fendrich green
sd · 1984
2 sentences

1987Mayrose v. Fendrich, 347 N.W.2d 585 (S.D.1984); Mortweet v. Eliason, 335 N.W.2d 812 (S.D.1983); Weaver v. Boortz, 301 N.W.2d 673 (S.D.1981).

1987Mayrose v. Fendrich, 347 N.W.2d 585 (S.D.1984); Mortweet v. Eliason, 335 N.W.2d 812 (S.D.1983); Weaver v. Boortz, 301 N.W.2d 673 (S.D.1981).

11987–1987
State v. Sutton green
sd · 1982
1 sentence

1987State v. Lashwood, 384 N.W.2d 319 (S.D.1986); Halverson v. State, 372 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1985); Graham v. State, 328 N.W.2d 254 (S.D.1982); Gregory v. State, 325 N.W.2d 297 (S.D.1982); State v. Sutton, 317 N.W.2d 414 (S.D.1982); Spirit Track v. State, 272 N.W.2d 803 (S.D.1978); State v. Doherty, 261 N.W.2d 677 (S.D.1978).

11987–1987
Halverson v. State green
sd · 1985
1 sentence

1987State v. Lashwood, 384 N.W.2d 319 (S.D.1986); Halverson v. State, 372 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1985); Graham v. State, 328 N.W.2d 254 (S.D.1982); Gregory v. State, 325 N.W.2d 297 (S.D.1982); State v. Sutton, 317 N.W.2d 414 (S.D.1982); Spirit Track v. State, 272 N.W.2d 803 (S.D.1978); State v. Doherty, 261 N.W.2d 677 (S.D.1978).

11987–1987
Graham v. State green
sd · 1982
1 sentence

1987State v. Lashwood, 384 N.W.2d 319 (S.D.1986); Halverson v. State, 372 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1985); Graham v. State, 328 N.W.2d 254 (S.D.1982); Gregory v. State, 325 N.W.2d 297 (S.D.1982); State v. Sutton, 317 N.W.2d 414 (S.D.1982); Spirit Track v. State, 272 N.W.2d 803 (S.D.1978); State v. Doherty, 261 N.W.2d 677 (S.D.1978).

11987–1987
Weaver v. Boortz green
sd · 1981
2 sentences

1987Mayrose v. Fendrich, 347 N.W.2d 585 (S.D.1984); Mortweet v. Eliason, 335 N.W.2d 812 (S.D.1983); Weaver v. Boortz, 301 N.W.2d 673 (S.D.1981).

1987Mayrose v. Fendrich, 347 N.W.2d 585 (S.D.1984); Mortweet v. Eliason, 335 N.W.2d 812 (S.D.1983); Weaver v. Boortz, 301 N.W.2d 673 (S.D.1981).

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

TX 368 (1962–2026) IL 218 (1969–2026) CA 136 (1954–2026) MA 92 (1990–2026) MS 72 (1992–2025) MI 71 (1971–2026) WI 43 (1968–2025) NJ 39 (1981–2026) WA 37 (1976–2026) MN 34 (1978–2026) NY 31 (1968–2026) IA 28 (1980–2022) PA 25 (1973–2023) FL 23 (1974–2025) MO 22 (1974–2022) ID 19 (1985–2026) IN 18 (1990–2026) CT 17 (1987–2021) TN 16 (1994–2020) VT 15 (1978–2026) OR 14 (1974–2024) MD 13 (1987–2025) KS 13 (1993–2022) OK 13 (1988–2023) GA 10 (1988–2026) SD 10 (1987–2016) WY 9 (1989–2023) NH 8 (2011–2025) DC 8 (1974–2024) AZ 7 (1977–2018) DE 7 (2001–2015) OH 7 (2004–2023) NM 6 (1976–2019) UT 6 (1984–2023) ND 6 (1982–2012) AK 5 (1998–2025) LA 5 (1975–2008) AR 5 (1987–2016) ME 4 (1983–2008) NE 4 (2017–2026) AL 4 (1988–2026) NV 4 (2014–2018) SC 4 (2012–2022) WV 4 (1936–2025) NC 3 (2012–2022) CO 3 (1993–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check