10 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1858–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ortale v. City of Rowlettgreen2 sentences2019See State Bar of Tex. v. Kilpatrick, 874 S.W.2d 656, 658 (Tex. 1994); Ortale v. City of Rowlett, 696 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex. App.— Dallas 1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (concluding the trial court abused its discretion in denying leave to file a trial amendment in the absence of a showing that the opposing party would be surprised or prejudiced in the maintenance or defense of the action); see also Rev 2 Props., Inc. v. Skip’s Rest. 2018Ortale v. City of Rowlett, 696 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.). | 2 | 2 |
Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.green2 sentences2014Fitzgerald v. U.S. Lines Co., 374 U.S. 16, 21 , 83 S.Ct. 1646 , 10 L.Ed.2d 720 (1963) (“[W]e hold that a maintenance and cure claim joined with a Jones Act claim must be submitted to the jury when both arise out of one set of facts.”); Tate, 634 F.2d at 870-71 (holding that seaman may either “ask for severance of the maintenance claim and an expedited trial of it by the court,” or “elect to have a jury trial of that claim when his Jones Act claim is heard,” but may not have both); see also Spencer v. Louisiana ex rel. 2014Fitzgerald v. U.S. Lines Co., 374 U.S. 16, 21 , 83 S.Ct. 1646 , 10 L.Ed.2d 720 (1963) (“[W]e hold that a maintenance and cure claim joined with a Jones Act claim must be submitted to the jury when both arise out of one set of facts.”); Tate, 634 F.2d at 870-71 (holding that seaman may either “ask for severance of the maintenance claim and an expedited trial of it by the court,” or “elect to have a jury trial of that claim when his Jones Act claim is heard,” but may not have both); see also Spencer v. Louisiana ex rel. | 2 | 2 |
CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC v. Public Utility Commissiongreen2 sentences2008See CenterPoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. PUC 212 S.W.3d 389 , 396 n. 6 (Tex.App.-Austin 2006, judgm’t vacated w.r.m.) (describing “spinning reserves” as a utility company’s maintenance requirement imposed by the Energy Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) or a like body which requirement obligates the utility to maintain a reserve of generating electrical capacity that can be used in the event of a system disturbance or disruption). 2008See Centerpoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. PUC 212 S.W.3d 389 , 396 n.6 (Tex. App.–Austin 2006, judgm’t vacated w.r.m.) (describing “spinning reserves” as a utility company’s maintenance requirement imposed by the Energy Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) or a like body which requirement obligates the utility to maintain a reserve of generating electrical capacity that can be used in the event of a system disturbance or disruption). | 2 | 2 |
Richard Tate v. American Tugs, Inc. And Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Defendantsgreen2 sentences2014Fitzgerald v. U.S. Lines Co., 374 U.S. 16, 21 , 83 S.Ct. 1646 , 10 L.Ed.2d 720 (1963) (“[W]e hold that a maintenance and cure claim joined with a Jones Act claim must be submitted to the jury when both arise out of one set of facts.”); Tate, 634 F.2d at 870-71 (holding that seaman may either “ask for severance of the maintenance claim and an expedited trial of it by the court,” or “elect to have a jury trial of that claim when his Jones Act claim is heard,” but may not have both); see also Spencer v. Louisiana ex rel. 2014Fitzgerald v. U.S. Lines Co., 374 U.S. 16, 21 (1963) (“[W]e hold that a maintenance and cure claim joined with a Jones Act claim must be submitted to the jury when both arise out of one set of facts.”); Tate, 634 F.2d at 870–71 (holding that seaman may either “ask for severance of the maintenance claim and an expedited trial of it by the court,” or “elect to have a jury trial of that claim when his Jones Act claim is heard,” but may not have both); see also Spencer v. Louisiana ex rel. | 1 | 2 |
Spencer v. STATE EX REL. DOTDgreen2 sentences2014Dep’t of Transp. & Development, 887 So.2d 28, 34-35 (La.Ct.App.2004) (holding Louisiana law required jury trial of maintenance and cure claim). 2014Dep’t of Transp. & Development, 887 So.2d 28 , 34–35 (La. | 1 | 2 |
State Bar of Texas v. Kilpatrickgreen1 sentence2019See State Bar of Tex. v. Kilpatrick, 874 S.W.2d 656, 658 (Tex. 1994); Ortale v. City of Rowlett, 696 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex. App.— Dallas 1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (concluding the trial court abused its discretion in denying leave to file a trial amendment in the absence of a showing that the opposing party would be surprised or prejudiced in the maintenance or defense of the action); see also Rev 2 Props., Inc. v. Skip’s Rest. | 1 | 1 |
Channel Two Television Co. v. Dickersongreen2 sentences1996The reporters argued that, because they had asserted their qualified privilege, the burden was on Coleman “to make a clear and specific showing ... that the information sought is: (1) highly material and relevant; (2) necessary or critical to the maintenance of the claim; and (3) not obtainable from other available sources.” Channel Two Television Co. v. Dickerson, 725 S.W.2d 470, 472 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, orig. proceeding). 1996Witnesses refer to the groups interchangeably. [2] The reporters argued that, because they had asserted their qualified privilege, the burden was on Coleman "to make a clear and specific showing... that the information sought is: (1) highly material and relevant; (2) necessary or critical to the maintenance of the claim; and (3) not obtainable from other available sources." Channel Two Television Co. v. Dickerson, 725 S.W.2d 470, 472 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 393154green2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation.green2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard Kuhngreen2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1 |
Silkwood v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporationgreen2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hatteras, Inc. v. United States
green
2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Alabama Power Co. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
green
2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Truly v. Madison General Hospital
green
2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Pollard v. City of Detroit
green
2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Old Mountain Properties, Ltd. v. April Investments, Inc.
green
2 sentences1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5 , 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705 , 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir. 1977). 1987United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70, 76, 77 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 816 , 104 S.Ct. 72 , 78 L.Ed.2d 85 (1983); In re Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 680 F.2d 5, 7-8 (2nd Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 909 , 103 S.Ct. 215 , 74 L.Ed.2d 171 (1982); Zerilli v. Smith, 656 F.2d 705, 713-715 (D.C.Cir.1981); Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 563 F.2d 433, 438 (10th Cir.1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Long v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence1911“This court, in Long v. Davis, 18 Ala., 801 , admitted the deposition of a witness taken in a former suit, after his removal from the .State, in a subsequent suit between the parties. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Garvin v. Stover
neutral
1 sentence1858It is not perceived that the evidence differs in any respect which is material from that given upon a former trial; which was held insufficient, when the case was before the court on a former appeal, to entitle the plaintiff to a recovery. ( 17 Tex. Rep. 292 .) The difficulty which the plaintiff has to encounter in the maintenance of his claim is, that at the date of the passage of the Act of the 21st of January, 1850, (Hart. | 1 | 1858–1858 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.