Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1921–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hahn v. Lovegreen2 sentences2011See Hahn, 321 S.W.3d at 527 . 2011See Hahn , 321 S.W.3d at 527 . | 2 | 2 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Accordingly, to justify submission of a jury charge on the issue of self-defense, there must be some evidence in the record that shows: (1) Appellant’s subjective state of mind—whether he had some apprehension or fear of being the recipient of the unlawful use of force from another, see Smith v. State, 676 S.W.2d 584, 585 (Tex.Crim.App. 1984), and that; (2) Appellant’s subjective apprehension of fear was objectively reasonable—the ordinary prudent-person standard. | 1 | 1 |
Werner v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See Werner, 711 S.W.2d at 645 . | 1 | 1 |
Tuggle v. Cookegreen1 sentence2015Tuggle v. Cooke, 277 S.W.2d 729, 732 (Civ. | 1 | 1 |
Hoenig v. Texas Commerce Bank, N.A.green1 sentence1999See Hoenig & Union Nat ‘1Bank v. Texas Commerce Bunk, 939 S.W.2d 656,661 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1996, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Consolidated Underwriters v. Seale
green
1 sentence1985Consolidated Underwriters v. Seale, 237 S.W. 642 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1922, writ dism’d). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
International-Great Northern R. v. Lucas
green
1 sentence1982The Bank replies by citing El Paso Electric Co. v. Raynolds Holding Co., 128 Tex. 495 , 100 S.W.2d 97 (1937), a decision to the effect that the law presumes a supplier of electricity will charge the proper legal rate, a presumption upon which the Bank was entitled to rely until it came into actual possession of facts sufficient to put an ordinary prudent person on inquiry. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
El Paso Electric Co. v. Raynolds Holding Co.
green
1 sentence1982The Bank replies by citing El Paso Electric Co. v. Raynolds Holding Co., 128 Tex. 495 , 100 S.W.2d 97 (1937), a decision to the effect that the law presumes a supplier of electricity will charge the proper legal rate, a presumption upon which the Bank was entitled to rely until it came into actual possession of facts sufficient to put an ordinary prudent person on inquiry. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Adam Dante Corporation v. Sharpe
green
1 sentence1974Adam Dante Corporation v. Sharpe, 483 S.W.2d 452 (Tex.Sup.1972). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Lane
neutral
1 sentence1944McClenny in 1917, or that the recitals were such as to put a prudent person on inquiry. 43 T.J. p. 650; 26 T.J. p. 498, Sec. 61; Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co., 26 Tex.Civ.App. 417 , 64 S.W. 696 ; Gilmer’s Estate v. Veatch, 102 Tex. 384 , 117 S.W. 430 ; Houston Oil Co. v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 216, 224 ; Brown v. Stumpff, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 806 ; Griggs v. Houston Oil Co., supra; Clayborn v. Gambill, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 508 , writ refused. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1944McClenny in 1917, or that the recitals were such as to put a prudent person on inquiry. 43 T.J. p. 650; 26 T.J. p. 498, Sec. 61; Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co., 26 Tex.Civ.App. 417 , 64 S.W. 696 ; Gilmer’s Estate v. Veatch, 102 Tex. 384 , 117 S.W. 430 ; Houston Oil Co. v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 216, 224 ; Brown v. Stumpff, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 806 ; Griggs v. Houston Oil Co., supra; Clayborn v. Gambill, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 508 , writ refused. 1944McClenny in 1917, or that the recitals were such as to put a prudent person on inquiry. 43 T.J. p. 650; 26 T.J. p. 498, Sec. 61; Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co., 26 Tex.Civ.App. 417 , 64 S.W. 696 ; Gilmer’s Estate v. Veatch, 102 Tex. 384 , 117 S.W. 430 ; Houston Oil Co. v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 216, 224 ; Brown v. Stumpff, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 806 ; Griggs v. Houston Oil Co., supra; Clayborn v. Gambill, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 508 , writ refused. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Estate of Gilmer v. Veatch
green
2 sentences1944McClenny in 1917, or that the recitals were such as to put a prudent person on inquiry. 43 T.J. p. 650; 26 T.J. p. 498, Sec. 61; Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co., 26 Tex.Civ.App. 417 , 64 S.W. 696 ; Gilmer’s Estate v. Veatch, 102 Tex. 384 , 117 S.W. 430 ; Houston Oil Co. v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 216, 224 ; Brown v. Stumpff, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 806 ; Griggs v. Houston Oil Co., supra; Clayborn v. Gambill, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 508 , writ refused. 1944McClenny in 1917, or that the recitals were such as to put a prudent person on inquiry. 43 T.J. p. 650; 26 T.J. p. 498, Sec. 61; Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co., 26 Tex.Civ.App. 417 , 64 S.W. 696 ; Gilmer’s Estate v. Veatch, 102 Tex. 384 , 117 S.W. 430 ; Houston Oil Co. v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 216, 224 ; Brown v. Stumpff, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 806 ; Griggs v. Houston Oil Co., supra; Clayborn v. Gambill, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 508 , writ refused. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Brown v. Stumpff
neutral
1 sentence1944McClenny in 1917, or that the recitals were such as to put a prudent person on inquiry. 43 T.J. p. 650; 26 T.J. p. 498, Sec. 61; Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co., 26 Tex.Civ.App. 417 , 64 S.W. 696 ; Gilmer’s Estate v. Veatch, 102 Tex. 384 , 117 S.W. 430 ; Houston Oil Co. v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 216, 224 ; Brown v. Stumpff, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 806 ; Griggs v. Houston Oil Co., supra; Clayborn v. Gambill, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 508 , writ refused. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Clayborn v. Gambill
neutral
1 sentence1944McClenny in 1917, or that the recitals were such as to put a prudent person on inquiry. 43 T.J. p. 650; 26 T.J. p. 498, Sec. 61; Neyland v. Texas Yellow Pine Lumber Co., 26 Tex.Civ.App. 417 , 64 S.W. 696 ; Gilmer’s Estate v. Veatch, 102 Tex. 384 , 117 S.W. 430 ; Houston Oil Co. v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App., 200 S.W. 216, 224 ; Brown v. Stumpff, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 806 ; Griggs v. Houston Oil Co., supra; Clayborn v. Gambill, Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 508 , writ refused. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Wilkerson v. Ward
neutral
1 sentence1921Wilkerson v. Ward, 137 S. W. 158 ; Carter v. Hawkins, 62 Tex. 393 ; Bacon v. O’Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Ross v. Morrow, 85 Tex. 172 , 19 S. W. 1090 , 16 L. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Bacon v. O'Connor
neutral
1 sentence1921Wilkerson v. Ward, 137 S. W. 158 ; Carter v. Hawkins, 62 Tex. 393 ; Bacon v. O’Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Ross v. Morrow, 85 Tex. 172 , 19 S. W. 1090 , 16 L. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Carter v. Hawkins
green
1 sentence1921Wilkerson v. Ward, 137 S. W. 158 ; Carter v. Hawkins, 62 Tex. 393 ; Bacon v. O’Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Ross v. Morrow, 85 Tex. 172 , 19 S. W. 1090 , 16 L. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Ross v. Morrow
neutral
2 sentences1921Wilkerson v. Ward, 137 S. W. 158 ; Carter v. Hawkins, 62 Tex. 393 ; Bacon v. O’Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Ross v. Morrow, 85 Tex. 172 , 19 S. W. 1090 , 16 L. 1921Wilkerson v. Ward, 137 S. W. 158 ; Carter v. Hawkins, 62 Tex. 393 ; Bacon v. O’Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Ross v. Morrow, 85 Tex. 172 , 19 S. W. 1090 , 16 L. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.