9 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Native Village of Tununak v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Servicesgreen2 sentences2014In other words, the court must determine not only that a placement is preferred, but also that the placement would be a suitable caretaker for the child.[26] But after today’s decision, it does not appear that a trial court has to make any inquiry about preferential adoptive placement unless an eligible person actually files an adoption petition.27 And now, when multiple relatives in a village might consider 25 (...continued) suitable families for placement after a diligent search has been completed for families meeting the preference criteria”). 26 303 P.3d 431, 450 (Alaska 2013) (citations o 2014In other words, the court must determine not only that a placement is preferred, but also that the placement would be a suitable caretaker for the child.[26] But after today’s decision, it does not appear that a trial court has to make any inquiry about preferential adoptive placement unless an eligible person actually files an adoption petition.27 And now, when multiple relatives in a village might consider 25 (...continued) suitable families for placement after a diligent search has been completed for families meeting the preference criteria”). 26 303 P.3d 431, 450 (Alaska 2013) (citations o | 2 | 2 |
Eubanks v. Stategreen2 sentences1986Here, unlike the situation presented in Oksoktaruk v. State, 611 P.2d 521 (Alaska 1980) and Eubanks v. State, 516 P.2d 726, 729 (Alaska 1973), Adkinson's prior acts are "so related to the crime charged in point of time or circumstances that evidence thereof is significantly useful in showing the defendant's intent in connection with the crime charged." However, this does not end the inquiry. 1986Here, unlike the situation presented in Oksoktaruk v. State, 611 P.2d 521 (Alaska 1980) and Eubanks v. State, 516 P.2d 726, 729 (Alaska 1973), Adkinson’s prior acts are “so related to the crime charged in point of time or circumstances that evidence thereof is significantly useful in showing the defendant’s intent in connection with the crime charged.” However, this does not end the inquiry. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Montgomery v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2023Fletcher also raises a state constitutional claim under Article I, Section 12 of the Alaska Constitution.117 As already discussed, a 114 Id. 115 At the time of Fletcher’s sentencing, an adult defendant convicted of first-degree murder faced a sentence of 20 to 99 years, and an adult defendant convicted of second-degree murder faced a sentence of 5 to 99 years. 2023Fletcher also raises a state constitutional claim under Article I, Section 12 of the Alaska Constitution.117 As already discussed, a 114 Id. 115 At the time of Fletcher’s sentencing, an adult defendant convicted of first-degree murder faced a sentence of 20 to 99 years, and an adult defendant convicted of second-degree murder faced a sentence of 5 to 99 years. | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Oksoktaruk v. State
green
2 sentences1986Here, unlike the situation presented in Oksoktaruk v. State, 611 P.2d 521 (Alaska 1980) and Eubanks v. State, 516 P.2d 726, 729 (Alaska 1973), Adkinson's prior acts are "so related to the crime charged in point of time or circumstances that evidence thereof is significantly useful in showing the defendant's intent in connection with the crime charged." However, this does not end the inquiry. 1986Here, unlike the situation presented in Oksoktaruk v. State, 611 P.2d 521 (Alaska 1980) and Eubanks v. State, 516 P.2d 726, 729 (Alaska 1973), Adkinson’s prior acts are “so related to the crime charged in point of time or circumstances that evidence thereof is significantly useful in showing the defendant’s intent in connection with the crime charged.” However, this does not end the inquiry. | 2 | 1980–1986 |
Closson v. State
green
1 sentence1992However, even if we assume that the promises made by the interviewing officers did not bind the state—an issue expressly left undecided by the supreme court in Closson v. State, 812 P.2d 966 , 971 n. 6 (Alaska 1991)—this does not end the inquiry. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages
green
2 sentences1983When a tax is challenged under the import-export clause, the court must, in addition, determine whether the tax offends any of the three purposes of that clause, as delineated in Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276 , 96 S.Ct. 535 , 46 L.Ed.2d 495 (1976). 1983When a tax is challenged under the import-export clause, the court must, in addition, determine whether the tax offends any of the three purposes of that clause, as delineated in Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, 423 U.S. 276 , 96 S.Ct. 535 , 46 L.Ed.2d 495 (1976). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Cleary v. State
green
1 sentence1978In making this determination, we apply the standard of review for sentence appeals which is whether the trial court’s imposition of sentence was “clearly mistaken.” Clearly v. State, 548 P.2d 952 , 954 & n. 8 (Alaska 1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.