7 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chapman v. Californiared2 sentences2024We still must apply the constitutional harmless error standard to determine whether the trial court 's error was "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." Hagos , ¶ 11 , 288 P.3d at 119 ( quoting Chapman , 386 U.S. at 24 ) . 2024We still must apply the constitutional harmless error standard to determine whether the trial court's error was "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." Hagos , ¶ 11, 288 P.3d at 119 (quoting Chapman , 386 U.S. at 24). | 1 | 2 |
Hagos v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2024We still must apply the constitutional harmless error standard to determine whether the trial court 's error was "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." Hagos , ¶ 11 , 288 P.3d at 119 ( quoting Chapman , 386 U.S. at 24 ) . 2024We still must apply the constitutional harmless error standard to determine whether the trial court's error was "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." Hagos , ¶ 11, 288 P.3d at 119 (quoting Chapman , 386 U.S. at 24). | 1 | 1 |
Jenkins v. Panama Canal Railway Co.green1 sentence2021See id. ¶ 19 But this does not end our inquiry. | 1 | 1 |
Hutchinson v. Hutchinsongreen2 sentences2018Hutchinson v. Hutchinson , 149 Colo. 38 , 367 P.2d 594 , 596 (1961) ("The substance of the claim rather than the appellation applied to the pleading by the litigant is what controls. 2018Hutchinson v. Hutchinson , 149 Colo. 38 , 367 P.2d 594 , 596 (1961) ("The substance of the claim rather than the appellation applied to the pleading by the litigant is what controls. | 1 | 1 |
Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute Mountain Ute Tribegreen1 sentence2010See Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, 107 P.3d 402, 406 (Colo.App.2004) (court of appeals may affirm on any ground supported by the record). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Moldovangreen1 sentence2004See State v. Moldovan, 842 P.2d 220 (Colo.1992)(holding that a fence adjacent to a highway was a safety device that was an integral part of the highway). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rock
green
2 sentences2020There is still the question of whether this particular attempted first degree murder is a lesser included offense of this particular first degree murder. ¶45 In Reyna-Abarca, we did not mean to suggest that whether an offense is a lesser included offense of another offense is strictly “a consequence of the statutory elements of the respective offenses alone.” People v. Rock, 2017 CO 84, ¶ 17 , 402 P.3d 472, 478 . 2020There is still the question of whether this particular attempted first degree murder is a lesser included offense of this particular first degree murder. ¶45 In Reyna-Abarca, we did not mean to suggest that whether an offense is a lesser included offense of another offense is strictly “a consequence of the statutory elements of the respective offenses alone.” People v. Rock, 2017 CO 84, ¶ 17 , 402 P.3d 472, 478 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.