Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Newellgreen1 sentence2023See State v. Newell, 710 N.W.2d 6, 25 (Iowa 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Maine v. Moultongreen1 sentence2017See Maine v. Moulton, 474 U.S. 159, 170-71 (1985) (“Once the right to counsel has attached and been asserted, the State must of course honor it. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Rene Zarate
green
2 sentences2018We still must “consider 28 our controlling precedents and our interpretation of the Iowa Constitution’s text, history, meaning, and purpose to guide our own independent judgment on the constitutionality of the challenged sentence.” Zarate, 908 N.W.2d at 843 . 2018We still must "consider our controlling precedents and our interpretation *200 of the Iowa Constitution's text, history, meaning, and purpose to guide our own independent judgment on the constitutionality of the challenged sentence." Zarate , 908 N.W.2d at 843 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James C. Van Ginkel
green
1 sentence2017But this does not end our analysis of the Board’s claim under this rule, for the rule also requires Crotty to “take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal” when he came to know of the forgeries. 11 Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In Re the Marriage of Huisman
green
1 sentence2010“We have recognized salary packages can be substantially enhanced by nonsalary items ... and the court should look at these factors in assessing a child support award.” Id. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Jeffries
green
1 sentence1989Before submitting these statutorily created lesser-included offenses, we stated: “[T]he trial courts must apply the factual test to determine if sufficient evidence exists to submit these statutorily mandated lesser-included offenses.” Id. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1985We emphasized in Johnson that “[ejven when evidence of other crimes has some relevancy, the trial court must exercise discretion to determine whether the probative value of the evidence is outweighed by its prejudicial effect.” 224 N.W.2d at 621 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Smith
green
1 sentence1981In State v. Smith, 282 N.W.2d 138 (Iowa 1979), the defendant challenged trial court’s allowance of certain testimony by a witness not listed in the minutes. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.