Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Enriguez v. Stategreen1 sentence2025Where a fact increases the range of penalties to which an offender is exposed, that as-applied challenge must be raised below); see also Enriguez v. State, 858 So. 2d 338, 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). 5 Hypothetically, in a case where a defendant left the scene of an accident involving the death of several people, the addition of victim injury points for each victim could cause the lowest permissible sentence to exceed the statutory maximum, which would implicate Apprendi. | 1 | 1 |
Mazzoni v. Stategreen1 sentence2008This is so because "individuals who have a severe impairment that does not meet the criteria of the listings for mental disorders may still not have the `residential functional capacity' to engage in substantial gainful work activity" and thus may be "disabled." Mazzoni v. State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 686 So.2d 743, 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Battle v. Stategreen1 sentence1980See Goff v. General Motors Corp., 292 So.2d 594 (Fla.2d DCA 1974); Fla.R.App.P. 9.040. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shepheard v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.
green
1 sentence2010Shepheard, 922 So.2d at 343 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
McCain v. Florida Power Corporation
green
1 sentence1992In a recent opinion in McCain v. Florida Power Corporation, 593 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1992), the Florida Supreme Court addressed what it perceived to be a confusion of the foreseeability element of duty with the foreseeability inherent in proximate causation. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Hall v. State
green
1 sentence1990In Hall v. State, 517 So.2d 692 (Fla. 1988), we recognized that extraordinary trauma could be a proper basis for departure. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.