Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Browngreen1 sentence2017See State v. Brown , supra, 235 Conn. at 526 , 31 A.3d 434 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Browngreen1 sentence2017See State v. Brown , supra, 235 Conn. at 526 , 31 A.3d 434 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ouellettegreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., State v. Ouellette, 190 Conn. 84 , 89–90, 459 A.2d 1005 (1983) (defendant requested limiting instruction, and trial court indicated that it would give jury instruction but failed to do so). 2014See, e.g., State v. Ouellette, 190 Conn. 84 , 89–90, 459 A.2d 1005 (1983) (defendant requested limiting instruction, and trial court indicated that it would give jury instruction but failed to do so). | 1 | 1 |
Lafayette Bank & Trust Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.green2 sentences2012In the motion for reconsideration, the defendant’s counsel specifically stated that “[o]n Thursday, March 31, 2011, counsel marked the motion ‘take on the papers’: no objection had been made.” 6 It is well established that “[t]he knowledge and admissions of an attorney are imputed to his client.” Lafayette Bank & Trust Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 177 Conn. 137, 140, 411 A.2d 937 (1979). 2012In the motion for reconsideration, the defendant’s counsel specifically stated that “[o]n Thursday, March 31, 2011, counsel marked the motion ‘take on the papers’: no objection had been made.” 6 It is well established that “[t]he knowledge and admissions of an attorney are imputed to his client.” Lafayette Bank & Trust Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 177 Conn. 137, 140, 411 A.2d 937 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ryersongreen2 sentences2006See State v. Ryerson, 201 Conn. 333, 341-44 , 514 A.2d 337 (1986). 2006See State v. Ryerson, 201 Conn. 333, 341-44 , 514 A.2d 337 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 293838green1 sentence1972See United States v. Von Roeder, supra.” The court was not in error in admitting the thirty bags of heroin, or testimony about them, in evidence. *58 The defendant requested an instruction to the jury that a party’s failure to call an available material witness permits an inference that the witness’ testimony would be harmful to that party. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc., 225 Conn. 804 , 626 A.2d 729 (1993) (Audubon). 2013Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc., 225 Conn. 804 , 626 A.2d 729 (1993) (Audubon). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences2009The defendant recognizes that his trial counsel “may not have been particularly eloquent” in raising these issues at trial and, to the extent that these interrelated claims are not preserved, requests review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 2009The defendant recognizes that his trial counsel “may not have been particularly eloquent” in raising these issues at trial and, to the extent that these interrelated claims are not preserved, requests review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Scott
green
2 sentences2006The court and both counsel examined those cases as well as State v. Scott, 256 Conn. 517, 534 , 779 A.2d 702 (2001). 6 Following a discussion of that case law and the evidence presented to the jury, counsel agreed to “keep [the instruction] the way it is,” but the defendant requested that his exception be noted. 2006The court and both counsel examined those cases as well as State v. Scott, 256 Conn. 517, 534 , 779 A.2d 702 (2001). 6 Following a discussion of that case law and the evidence presented to the jury, counsel agreed to “keep [the instruction] the way it is,” but the defendant requested that his exception be noted. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Whistnant
green
2 sentences1980Although the defendant requested this instruction in accordance with State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 , 427 A.2d 414 (1979), he was not entitled to it because it is possible to commit the greater offense, in the manner described in the information or bill of particulars, without having first committed the lesser. 1980Although the defendant requested this instruction in accordance with State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 , 427 A.2d 414 (1979), he was not entitled to it because it is possible to commit the greater offense, in the manner described in the information or bill of particulars, without having first committed the lesser. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.