Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Robinsongreen2 sentences1996That reaction, however, ignores “[t]he principle that prosecutorial comment must be examined in context . . . .” Id., 33. 1996That reaction, however, ignores “[t]he principle that prosecutorial comment must be examined in context . . . .” Id., 33. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Annunziato
green
2 sentences1975The Griffin rule, first applied in this'state in State v. *587 Annunziato, 154 Conn. 41 , 221 A.2d 57 , forbids adverse comments by the prosecution or the court upon the failure of the accused to testify. 1975The Griffin rule, first applied in this'state in State v. *587 Annunziato, 154 Conn. 41 , 221 A.2d 57 , forbids adverse comments by the prosecution or the court upon the failure of the accused to testify. | 4 | 1966–1975 |
Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
green
2 sentences1983We applied the Griffin rule to a trio of cases in which appeals were pending at the time Griffin was announced, in accordance with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Ohio, 382 U.S. 286 , 86 S. Ct. 445 , 15 L. 1983We applied the Griffin rule to a trio of cases in which appeals were pending at the time Griffin was announced, in accordance with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Ohio, 382 U.S. 286 , 86 S. Ct. 445 , 15 L. | 3 | 1966–1983 |
O'Connor v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1983We applied the Griffin rule to a trio of cases in which appeals were pending at the time Griffin was announced, in accordance with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Ohio, 382 U.S. 286 , 86 S. Ct. 445 , 15 L. 1983We applied the Griffin rule to a trio of cases in which appeals were pending at the time Griffin was announced, in accordance with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Ohio, 382 U.S. 286 , 86 S. Ct. 445 , 15 L. | 3 | 1966–1983 |
Rembert v. Evans
green
2 sentences1983We applied the Griffin rule to a trio of cases in which appeals were pending at the time Griffin was announced, in accordance with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Ohio, 382 U.S. 286 , 86 S. Ct. 445 , 15 L. 1983We applied the Griffin rule to a trio of cases in which appeals were pending at the time Griffin was announced, in accordance with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Ohio, 382 U.S. 286 , 86 S. Ct. 445 , 15 L. | 3 | 1966–1983 |
Griffin v. Parker
green
1 sentence2015Id., 367 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
United States v. Nobles
green
2 sentences1996The court emphasized that both sides in a criminal trial are entitled to fairness and concluded that the comment was therefore permissible: “ ‘[The] central purpose of a criminal trial is to decide the factual question of the defendant’s guilt or innocence, United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 [ 95 S. Ct. 2160 , 45 L. 1996The court emphasized that both sides in a criminal trial are entitled to fairness and concluded that the comment was therefore permissible: “ ‘[The] central purpose of a criminal trial is to decide the factual question of the defendant’s guilt or innocence, United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 [ 95 S. Ct. 2160 , 45 L. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Griffin v. California
green
2 sentences1983Griffin v. California, supra.’ [Tehan v. Shott, supra,] 408. 1983Griffin v. California, supra.’ [Tehan v. Shott, supra,] 408. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences1976Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 . 1976Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
O’connor v. Ohio
green
2 sentences1971In the second O’Connor case, 385 U.S. 92, 93 , 87 S. Ct. 252 , 17 L. 1971In the second O’Connor case, 385 U.S. 92, 93 , 87 S. Ct. 252 , 17 L. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. Shott
green
2 sentences1971Ed. 2d 189 , the court applied the Griffin rule to cases in which the “conviction was not final when the decision in Griffin was rendered.” Footnote three in Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 , 409, 86 S. Ct. 459 , 15 L. 1971Ed. 2d 189 , the court applied the Griffin rule to cases in which the “conviction was not final when the decision in Griffin was rendered.” Footnote three in Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 , 409, 86 S. Ct. 459 , 15 L. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Stovall v. Denno
green
2 sentences1971Furthermore, application of the retroactivity tests prescribed by that court in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 297 , 87 S. Ct. 1967 , 18 L. 1971Furthermore, application of the retroactivity tests prescribed by that court in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 297 , 87 S. Ct. 1967 , 18 L. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Fredericks v. Reincke
green
2 sentences1971Under the circumstances in which the defendant's late appeal was granted it is clear that although his trial had been completed in 1961 before the Griffin decision was released, nevertheless, because of the appeal permitted in 1969, as a result of the habeas corpus proceedings, his conviction was not "final." Nor could the trial court properly limit the grounds on which the appeal might be predicated. *351 Fredericks v. Reincke, 152 Conn. 501, 508 , 208 A.2d 756 . 1971Under the circumstances in which the defendant's late appeal was granted it is clear that although his trial had been completed in 1961 before the Griffin decision was released, nevertheless, because of the appeal permitted in 1969, as a result of the habeas corpus proceedings, his conviction was not "final." Nor could the trial court properly limit the grounds on which the appeal might be predicated. *351 Fredericks v. Reincke, 152 Conn. 501, 508 , 208 A.2d 756 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
State v. Vars
green
2 sentences1967Ed. 2d 189 , holding, in circumstances similar to those in the present case, that failure to observe state procedural requirements is not a bar to an assertion, on appeal, of the Griffin rule, and, in State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 272 , 224 A.2d 744 , we have applied the law as thus established. 1967Ed. 2d 189 , holding, in circumstances similar to those in the present case, that failure to observe state procedural requirements is not a bar to an assertion, on appeal, of the Griffin rule, and, in State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 272 , 224 A.2d 744 , we have applied the law as thus established. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Malloy v. Hogan
green
2 sentences1966As we noted in the Annunziato case (p. 43), the defendant, alerted by Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 , 84 S. Ct. 1489 , 12 L. 1966As we noted in the Annunziato case (p. 43), the defendant, alerted by Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 , 84 S. Ct. 1489 , 12 L. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.