Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mozingo v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1990See also Mozingo v. United States, 503 A.2d 1238 (D.C.1986), where probable cause to arrest was found when appellant removed a white container from a bag, emptied a number of pills, returned the pills to the container, and then gave the container to a man in exchange for some money. 1990See also Mozingo v. United States, 503 A.2d 1238 (D.C.1986), where probable cause to arrest was found when appellant removed a white container from a bag, emptied a number of pills, returned the pills to the container, and then gave the container to a man in exchange for some money. | 2 | 2 |
Hasty v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2004It was then that the court added to the instruction the language challenged on appeal to the effect that “[i]f the defendant honestly and reasonably believes that he is acting in self-defense, self defense is a defense to both second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.” (Emphasis added.) Under the circumstances, appellant contends, he could do no more than he did, i.e., stating that “without expanding further I will disagree and object to that.” However, he contends that, in light of defense counsel’s focus during the discussions the previous day, the objection he raised was necessarily | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Wardlow
green
2 sentences2007In Wardlow, supra, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that: “An individual’s presence in an area of expected criminal activity, standing alone, is not enough to support a reasonable, particularized suspicion that the person is committing a crime.” Id., 528 U.S. at 124 , 120 S.Ct. 673 (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)). 2007In Wardlow, supra, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that: “An individual’s presence in an area of expected criminal activity, standing alone, is not enough to support a reasonable, particularized suspicion that the person is committing a crime.” Id., 528 U.S. at 124 , 120 S.Ct. 673 (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)). | 2 | 2006–2007 |
Brown v. Texas
green
2 sentences2007In Wardlow, supra, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that: “An individual’s presence in an area of expected criminal activity, standing alone, is not enough to support a reasonable, particularized suspicion that the person is committing a crime.” Id., 528 U.S. at 124 , 120 S.Ct. 673 (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)). 2007In Wardlow, supra, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that: “An individual’s presence in an area of expected criminal activity, standing alone, is not enough to support a reasonable, particularized suspicion that the person is committing a crime.” Id., 528 U.S. at 124 , 120 S.Ct. 673 (citing Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979)). | 2 | 2006–2007 |
George Albert Williams v. District of Columbia
green
2 sentences2009The “something more”, was the added requirement that the objectionable language “be spoken in circumstances which threaten a breach of the peace.” Id. at 64, 419 F.2d at 646 . 2009The "something more", was the added requirement that the objectionable language "be spoken in circumstances which threaten a breach of the peace." Id. at 64, 419 F.2d at 646 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Russell v. United States
green
2 sentences2004It was then that the court added to the instruction the language challenged on appeal to the effect that “[i]f the defendant honestly and reasonably believes that he is acting in self-defense, self defense is a defense to both second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.” (Emphasis added.) Under the circumstances, appellant contends, he could do no more than he did, i.e., stating that “without expanding further I will disagree and object to that.” However, he contends that, in light of defense counsel’s focus during the discussions the previous day, the objection he raised was necessarily 2004It was then that the court added to the instruction the language challenged on appeal to the effect that “[i]f the defendant honestly and reasonably believes that he is acting in self-defense, self defense is a defense to both second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter.” (Emphasis added.) Under the circumstances, appellant contends, he could do no more than he did, i.e., stating that “without expanding further I will disagree and object to that.” However, he contends that, in light of defense counsel’s focus during the discussions the previous day, the objection he raised was necessarily | 1 | 2004–2004 |
In Re Chisholm
green
1 sentence1997Chisholm, 679 A.2d at 503-05 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Frederick A. Young v. United States
green
1 sentence1996Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Adams v. United States
green
1 sentence1984As the court’s analysis in Adams, supra, makes clear, the added requirement of a threat of breach of the peace was necessary to avoid infringing on the First Amendment freedom of assembly. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.