police error in Illinois

2025And that search would have uncovered the gun in the trunk. ¶ 30 The doctrine of “inevitable discovery” provides that evidence obtained in an illegal search will not be suppressed if it “ ‘would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.’ ” People v. Sutherland, 223 Ill. 2d 187, 227-28 (2006) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 (1984)).

2025The inevitable discovery doctrine provides “that evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights and which otherwise would be inadmissible at trial may be admitted if the prosecution is able to show that the challenged evidence ‘would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.’ ” Id. at 142 (1991) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 (1984)). ¶ 62 Defendant argues that the inevitable discovery doctrine does not apply because the information the officers used to secure the warrant was obtained after their unlawful entry into

2025And that search would have uncovered the gun in the trunk. ¶ 30 The doctrine of “inevitable discovery” provides that evidence obtained in an illegal search will not be suppressed if it “ ‘would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.’ ” People v. Sutherland, 223 Ill. 2d 187, 227-28 (2006) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 (1984)).

2024“This exception permits evidence, that would otherwise be inadmissible at trial, to be admitted where the State can show that such evidence ‘would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.’ ” Sutherland, 223 Ill. 2d 187, 228 (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 (1984)). ¶ 32 As the State argues, defendant’s vehicle would have inevitably been subject to an inventory search before it was impounded.

2025The inevitable discovery doctrine provides “that evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights and which otherwise would be inadmissible at trial may be admitted if the prosecution is able to show that the challenged evidence ‘would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.’ ” Id. at 142 (1991) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 (1984)). ¶ 62 Defendant argues that the inevitable discovery doctrine does not apply because the information the officers used to secure the warrant was obtained after their unlawful entry into

2004Under that rule, “evidence that otherwise would be inadmissible may be admitted if the prosecution can show that the evidence ‘ “would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.” ’ ” People v. Mitchell, 189 Ill. 2d 312, 342 , 727 N.E.2d 254, 272 (2000), quoting People v. Edwards, 144 Ill. 2d 108, 142 , 579 N.E.2d 336, 349 (1991), quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 , 81 L.

2015See, e.g., United States v. Dawdy, 46 F.3d 1427, 1430-31 (8th Cir. 1995) (suppression denied when resistance provided independent grounds for arrest); State v. Williams, 926 A.2d 340 (N.J. 2007) (interpreting New Jersey’s obstruction statute); Reynolds v. State, 634 S.E.2d 842, 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006) (act of fleeing was a separate crime). ¶ 57 Finally, the State contends that the evidence was nevertheless admissible under People v. Henderson, 2013 IL 114040 , a case that considered whether the abandonment of a gun during flight from officers broke the causal connection between an illegal stop

2015See, e.g., United States v. Dawdy, 46 F.3d 1427, 1430-31 (8th Cir. 1995) (suppression denied when resistance provided independent grounds for arrest); State v. Williams, 926 A.2d 340 (N.J. 2007) (interpreting New Jersey’s obstruction statute); Reynolds v. State, 634 S.E.2d 842, 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006) (act of fleeing was a separate crime). ¶ 57 Finally, the State contends that the evidence was nevertheless admissible under People v. Henderson, 2013 IL 114040 , a case that considered whether the abandonment of a gun during flight from officers broke the causal connection between an illegal stop

2015See, e.g., United States v. Dawdy, 46 F.3d 1427, 1430-31 (8th Cir. 1995) (suppression denied when resistance provided independent grounds for arrest); State v. Williams, 926 A.2d 340 (N.J. 2007) (interpreting New Jersey’s obstruction statute); Reynolds v. State, 634 S.E.2d 842, 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006) (act of fleeing was a separate crime). ¶ 57 Finally, the State contends that the evidence was nevertheless admissible under People v. Henderson, 2013 IL 114040 , a case that considered whether the abandonment of a gun during flight from officers broke the causal connection between an illegal stop

2015See, e.g., United States v. Dawdy, 46 F.3d 1427, 1430-31 (8th Cir. 1995) (suppression denied when resistance provided independent grounds for arrest); State v. Williams, 926 A.2d 340 (N.J. 2007) (interpreting New Jersey’s obstruction statute); Reynolds v. State, 634 S.E.2d 842, 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006) (act of fleeing was a separate crime). ¶ 57 Finally, the State contends that the evidence was nevertheless admissible under People v. Henderson, 2013 IL 114040 , a case that considered whether the abandonment of a gun during flight from officers broke the causal connection between an illegal stop

2014People v. Ganter, 56 Ill.

2013People v. Ganter, 56 Ill.

2004Under that rule, “evidence that otherwise would be inadmissible may be admitted if the prosecution can show that the evidence ‘ “would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.” ’ ” People v. Mitchell, 189 Ill. 2d 312, 342 , 727 N.E.2d 254, 272 (2000), quoting People v. Edwards, 144 Ill. 2d 108, 142 , 579 N.E.2d 336, 349 (1991), quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 , 81 L.

2004Under that rule, “evidence that otherwise would be inadmissible may be admitted if the prosecution can show that the evidence ‘ “would inevitably have been discovered without reference to the police error or misconduct.” ’ ” People v. Mitchell, 189 Ill. 2d 312, 342 , 727 N.E.2d 254, 272 (2000), quoting People v. Edwards, 144 Ill. 2d 108, 142 , 579 N.E.2d 336, 349 (1991), quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 448 , 81 L.

2014See Provena Covenant Medical Center, 236 Ill. 2d at 386-87 .

2014See Provena Covenant Medical Center, 236 Ill. 2d at 368-87 .

2005See, e.g. , Anderson , 142 Wis. 2d at 169 , 417 N.W.2d at 414 (holding that the exception applies when a seizure occurs, the police were engaged in " bona fide community caretaker activity," and the public's interest in the police activity in question outweighs the intrusion on the individual's right to be let alone).

2005See, e.g., Anderson, 142 Wis. 2d at 169 , 417 N.W.2d at 414 (holding that the exception applies when a seizure occurs, the police were engaged in “bona fide community caretaker activity,” and the public’s interest in the police activity in question outweighs the intrusion on the individual’s right to be let alone).

2024An inventory search is a “judicially created exception to the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment.” People v. Hundley, 156 Ill.2d 135, 138 (1993); see also Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 (1990).

2024An inventory search is a “judicially created exception to the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment.” People v. Hundley, 156 Ill.2d 135, 138 (1993); see also Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 (1990).

2022People v. R.C., 108 Ill. 2d 349, 355 (1985); see In re D.L.H., 2015 IL 117341, ¶¶ 56, 58, 81 (admission of involuntary statement to police is subject to harmless-error analysis).

2022People v. R.C., 108 Ill. 2d 349, 355 (1985); see In re D.L.H., 2015 IL 117341, ¶¶ 56, 58, 81 (admission of involuntary statement to police is subject to harmless-error analysis).

2020People v. Ortiz, 235 Ill. 2d 319, 333 (2009).

2012App. 3d 728 , 736 (1997) (quoting Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596, 599, 601 (1948)). ¶ 83 Defendant’s principal argument regarding the motion to suppress is that he was interviewed by the police in violation of section 5-405 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (705 ILCS 405/5-405 (West 2000)).