10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pierce v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Pierce v. State, 761 N.E.2d 821, 824 (Ind. 2002) (noting that police deception weights against the voluntariness of a confession but is not dispositive and is only one consideration in determining the voluntariness of a statement and that Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 82A01-1606-CR-1428 | May 4, 2017 Page 7 of 9 the police claim that they had a preliminary DNA match for the defendant did not render his confession involuntary). | 1 | 1 |
Swenson v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Swenson v. State, 868 N.E.2d 540, 542 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). [7] Brewer asserts that his January 2014 Kentucky convictions for receiving stolen property and fleeing/evading the police bar Indiana’s prosecution of him for, respectively, auto theft and resisting law enforcement. | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Miller v. State, 770 N.E.2d 763, 767 (Ind.2002) (addressing claim that defendant's statement to the police and waiver of Miranda rights was involuntary); Luckhart v. State, 736 N.E.2d 227, 229 (Ind.2000) (addressing claim that defendant’s statement to the police was involuntary in light of police deception); Ellis v. State, 707 N.E.2d 797, 801 (Ind.1999) (addressing claim that defendant's confession to the police was involuntary in light of police deception and alleged coercion, and defendant’s alleged drug and alcohol use and lack of sleep); Brown v. State, 271 Ind. 129, 131 , 390 | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See, e.g., Miller v. State, 770 N.E.2d 763, 767 (Ind.2002) (addressing claim that defendant's statement to the police and waiver of Miranda rights was involuntary); Luckhart v. State, 736 N.E.2d 227, 229 (Ind.2000) (addressing claim that defendant’s statement to the police was involuntary in light of police deception); Ellis v. State, 707 N.E.2d 797, 801 (Ind.1999) (addressing claim that defendant's confession to the police was involuntary in light of police deception and alleged coercion, and defendant’s alleged drug and alcohol use and lack of sleep); Brown v. State, 271 Ind. 129, 131 , 390 2012See, e.g., Miller v. State, 770 N.E.2d 763, 767 (Ind.2002) (addressing claim that defendant's statement to the police and waiver of Miranda rights was involuntary); Luckhart v. State, 736 N.E.2d 227, 229 (Ind.2000) (addressing claim that defendant’s statement to the police was involuntary in light of police deception); Ellis v. State, 707 N.E.2d 797, 801 (Ind.1999) (addressing claim that defendant's confession to the police was involuntary in light of police deception and alleged coercion, and defendant’s alleged drug and alcohol use and lack of sleep); Brown v. State, 271 Ind. 129, 131 , 390 | 1 | 1 |
Whitfield v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Miller v. State, 770 N.E.2d 763, 767 (Ind.2002) (addressing claim that defendant's statement to the police and waiver of Miranda rights was involuntary); Luckhart v. State, 736 N.E.2d 227, 229 (Ind.2000) (addressing claim that defendant’s statement to the police was involuntary in light of police deception); Ellis v. State, 707 N.E.2d 797, 801 (Ind.1999) (addressing claim that defendant's confession to the police was involuntary in light of police deception and alleged coercion, and defendant’s alleged drug and alcohol use and lack of sleep); Brown v. State, 271 Ind. 129, 131 , 390 | 1 | 1 |
Luckhart v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Miller v. State, 770 N.E.2d 763, 767 (Ind.2002) (addressing claim that defendant's statement to the police and waiver of Miranda rights was involuntary); Luckhart v. State, 736 N.E.2d 227, 229 (Ind.2000) (addressing claim that defendant’s statement to the police was involuntary in light of police deception); Ellis v. State, 707 N.E.2d 797, 801 (Ind.1999) (addressing claim that defendant's confession to the police was involuntary in light of police deception and alleged coercion, and defendant’s alleged drug and alcohol use and lack of sleep); Brown v. State, 271 Ind. 129, 131 , 390 | 1 | 1 |
Ellis v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Miller v. State, 770 N.E.2d 763, 767 (Ind.2002) (addressing claim that defendant's statement to the police and waiver of Miranda rights was involuntary); Luckhart v. State, 736 N.E.2d 227, 229 (Ind.2000) (addressing claim that defendant’s statement to the police was involuntary in light of police deception); Ellis v. State, 707 N.E.2d 797, 801 (Ind.1999) (addressing claim that defendant's confession to the police was involuntary in light of police deception and alleged coercion, and defendant’s alleged drug and alcohol use and lack of sleep); Brown v. State, 271 Ind. 129, 131 , 390 | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., Miller v. State, 770 N.E.2d 763, 767 (Ind.2002) (addressing claim that defendant's statement to the police and waiver of Miranda rights was involuntary); Luckhart v. State, 736 N.E.2d 227, 229 (Ind.2000) (addressing claim that defendant’s statement to the police was involuntary in light of police deception); Ellis v. State, 707 N.E.2d 797, 801 (Ind.1999) (addressing claim that defendant's confession to the police was involuntary in light of police deception and alleged coercion, and defendant’s alleged drug and alcohol use and lack of sleep); Brown v. State, 271 Ind. 129, 131 , 390 | 1 | 1 |
Henry v. Schenk Mechanical Contractors, Inc.green2 sentences2005In the words of the Board, "[blecause Trooper Wiessing's suicide resulted from this condition, it is not considered to be a self-inflicted injury under Indiana Code 22-3-2-8." (App. at 10.) The Police claim the Board's decision is "contrary to law." (Appellant's Br. at 12, 13.) Whether an employee's injury was selfiinflicted "is uniquely (although not conclusively) a factual matter for the Board." Henry v. Schenk Mechanical Contractors, Inc., 169 Ind.App. 178, 186 , 346 N.E.2d 616, 622 (1976). 2005In the words of the Board, "[blecause Trooper Wiessing's suicide resulted from this condition, it is not considered to be a self-inflicted injury under Indiana Code 22-3-2-8." (App. at 10.) The Police claim the Board's decision is "contrary to law." (Appellant's Br. at 12, 13.) Whether an employee's injury was selfiinflicted "is uniquely (although not conclusively) a factual matter for the Board." Henry v. Schenk Mechanical Contractors, Inc., 169 Ind.App. 178, 186 , 346 N.E.2d 616, 622 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Little v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Little v. State, 694 N.E.2d 762, 765 (Ind.Ct.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
Newman v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Newman v. State, 719 N.E.2d 832, 836 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (finding that the defendant did not open the door into an inquiry into his character when the statements made by defendant were elicited by the State on cross-examination), trons. denied. 2002See Newman v. State, 719 N.E.2d 832, 836 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (finding that the defendant did not open the door into an inquiry into his character when the statements made by defendant were elicited by the State on cross-examination), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2019Specifically, Davis-Martin contends that (1) the State withheld his cell-phone records in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), (2) the State violated his due-process rights by not correcting a detective's false testimony, (3) the trial court erred in not supplementing the pattern jury instruction on impeachment by prior inconsistent statements, (4) the trial court admitted evidence that he told his mother he did not want to talk to the police in violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, (5) the evidence is insufficie 2019Specifically, Davis-Martin contends that (1) the State withheld his cell-phone records in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), (2) the State violated his due-process rights by not correcting a detective's false testimony, (3) the trial court erred in not supplementing the pattern jury instruction on impeachment by prior inconsistent statements, (4) the trial court admitted evidence that he told his mother he did not want to talk to the police in violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, (5) the evidence is insufficie | 2 | 1988–2019 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1991Edwards v. Arizona (1981) 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 , set forth the clear principle that once a request for counsel has been made, questioning may not begin or must cease until counsel is present. 1991Edwards v. Arizona (1981) 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 , set forth the clear principle that once a request for counsel has been made, questioning may not begin or must cease until counsel is present. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bruce v. State
green
2 sentences1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass.1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit 1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass.1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit | 1 | 1981–1981 |
United States v. Herndon
green
2 sentences1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir.1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass. 1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit 1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass.1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit | 1 | 1981–1981 |
T. Eugene Thompson v. Bruce McManus Warden, Minnesota State Prison
green
2 sentences1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir.1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass. 1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit 1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass.1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit | 1 | 1981–1981 |
People v. Gallmon
green
2 sentences1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass.1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit 1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass.1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Commonwealth v. Franklin
green
2 sentences1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir.1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass. 1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit 1981Bruce v. State, (1978) 268 Ind. 180 , 375 N.E.2d 1042 (report of accident with person trapped in vehicle); Thompson v. McManus, (8th Cir. 1975) 512 F.2d 769 (report of an assault); Commonwealth v. Franklin, (Mass.1978) 385 N.E.2d 227 (report that a person was attacked by man with a gun, followed by the police hearing gunshot coming from neighboring building); People v. Hodge, (1978) 44 N.Y.2d 553 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 736 , 378 N.E.2d 99 (murder scene); People v. Gallmon, (1967) 19 N.Y.2d 389 , 280 N.Y.S.2d 356 , 227 N.E.2d 284 (report of loud and noisy disturbance by boarders in rooming house); Unit | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.