9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dulaneygreen1 sentence2014See generally State v. Dulaney, 493 N.W.2d 787 , 789–90 (Iowa 1992) (noting the police asked multiple times for a chemical test and the defendant, twice by his silence and finally by his words, refused). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of Thompsongreen1 sentence1983Cases where the waiver or admission was found involuntary include In the Interest of Thompson , 241 N.W.2d 2, 7 (Iowa 1976) (defendant age seventeen, virtually abandoned at early age, spent four previous years in mental health center, had I.Q. of seventy-one, very low practical judgment, fourth grade reading level, was frightened, insecure, frustrated, exhibited *772 passive-agressive behavior, significant signs of brain damage, and borderline mental retardation; also deprived of sleep and consultation with guardian, custodian, adult friend or lawyer); State v. Cullison, 227 N.W.2d 121, 128-29 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cullisongreen1 sentence1983Cases where the waiver or admission was found involuntary include In the Interest of Thompson , 241 N.W.2d 2, 7 (Iowa 1976) (defendant age seventeen, virtually abandoned at early age, spent four previous years in mental health center, had I.Q. of seventy-one, very low practical judgment, fourth grade reading level, was frightened, insecure, frustrated, exhibited *772 passive-agressive behavior, significant signs of brain damage, and borderline mental retardation; also deprived of sleep and consultation with guardian, custodian, adult friend or lawyer); State v. Cullison, 227 N.W.2d 121, 128-29 | 1 | 1 |
Quad County Grain, Inc. v. Poegreen1 sentence1977Quad County Grain, Inc. v. Poe, Iowa, 202 N.W.2d 118, 119, 120 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wallin
green
1 sentence2005Nevertheless, Demaray argues that our prior case of State v. Wallin, 195 N.W.2d 95 (Iowa 1972), is contrary and requires the statutory procedure for the collection of blood samples to be followed to support the admission of the test results at trial. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Thompson
green
1 sentence1987As we held in Thompson , “[T]his evidence may not be deemed harmless.” 357 N.W.2d at 594 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Glaze
green
1 sentence1976Glaze, supra, 177 Iowa at 471 , 159 N.W. at 266. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Ritchison
green
1 sentence1974Although not argued by the State, we note this testimony would also be admissible under the admission rule discuss *217 ed in State v. Ritchison, 223 N.W.2d 207 (Iowa, filed November 13, 1974). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Alvin A. Jacobsen v. International Transport, Inc.
green
2 sentences1972We mention parenthetically that between Charlson and Boner, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals decided Jacobsen v. International Transport, Inc., 391 F.2d 49 (1968), which considered the withdrawal of blood from a cadaver. 1972We mention parenthetically that between Charlson and Boner, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals decided Jacobsen v. International Transport, Inc., 391 F.2d 49 (1968), which considered the withdrawal of blood from a cadaver. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
State v. Van Tassel
green
2 sentences1957To positively and affirmatively exclude every possibility of error, Doctor Huber, or some competent person, would be required to scientifically. analyze the chemical used not only as to its identity but also as tO' its purity.” In State v. Van Tassel, 103 Iowa 6, 13 , 72 N.W. 497, 499 , the court considered defendant’s contention that the evidence of the identity of certain organs taken from a body “must establish their identity to a moral certainty and beyond all reasonable doubt”, and held the identification sufficient to justify the admission of the analysis of the organs though there was s 1957To positively and affirmatively exclude every possibility of error, Doctor Huber, or some competent person, would be required to scientifically. analyze the chemical used not only as to its identity but also as tO' its purity.” In State v. Van Tassel, 103 Iowa 6, 13 , 72 N.W. 497, 499 , the court considered defendant’s contention that the evidence of the identity of certain organs taken from a body “must establish their identity to a moral certainty and beyond all reasonable doubt”, and held the identification sufficient to justify the admission of the analysis of the organs though there was s | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.