7 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rollins v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2023See Code § 18.2-268.9(B)(i). -8- Again, “substantial compliance is sufficient for the admission of the test results.” Henry v. Commonwealth, 44 Va. App. 702, 708 (2005); see also Shelton v. Commonwealth, 45 Va. App. 175, 180 (2005) (“We have even applied substantial compliance in cases where the statutory violation may have affected the reliability of the test results.”); Rollins v. Commonwealth, 37 Va. App. 73, 80 (2001) (“[T]he legislature did not intend that strict compliance with the breath- test methods approved by [DFS] be a prerequisite for the admission into evidence of the results of 2005See Cutright v. Commonwealth, 43 Va.App. 593, 600-01 , 601 S.E.2d 1, 4-5 (2004); Rollins, 37 Va.App. at 80 , 554 S.E.2d at 103 ; Snider v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 729, 732 , 496 S.E.2d 665, 666 (1998). | 1 | 2 |
Henry v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2023See Code § 18.2-268.9(B)(i). -8- Again, “substantial compliance is sufficient for the admission of the test results.” Henry v. Commonwealth, 44 Va. App. 702, 708 (2005); see also Shelton v. Commonwealth, 45 Va. App. 175, 180 (2005) (“We have even applied substantial compliance in cases where the statutory violation may have affected the reliability of the test results.”); Rollins v. Commonwealth, 37 Va. App. 73, 80 (2001) (“[T]he legislature did not intend that strict compliance with the breath- test methods approved by [DFS] be a prerequisite for the admission into evidence of the results of | 1 | 1 |
Frank Glading Shelton v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2023See Code § 18.2-268.9(B)(i). -8- Again, “substantial compliance is sufficient for the admission of the test results.” Henry v. Commonwealth, 44 Va. App. 702, 708 (2005); see also Shelton v. Commonwealth, 45 Va. App. 175, 180 (2005) (“We have even applied substantial compliance in cases where the statutory violation may have affected the reliability of the test results.”); Rollins v. Commonwealth, 37 Va. App. 73, 80 (2001) (“[T]he legislature did not intend that strict compliance with the breath- test methods approved by [DFS] be a prerequisite for the admission into evidence of the results of | 1 | 1 |
Schindel v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2011See Schindel v. Commonwealth, 219 Va. 814, 817 , 252 S.E.2d 302, 304 (1979). 2011See Schindel v. Commonwealth, 219 Va. 814, 817 , 252 S.E.2d 302, 304 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Cutright v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2005See Cutright v. Commonwealth, 43 Va.App. 593, 600-01 , 601 S.E.2d 1, 4-5 (2004); Rollins, 37 Va.App. at 80 , 554 S.E.2d at 103 ; Snider v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 729, 732 , 496 S.E.2d 665, 666 (1998). 2005See Cutright v. Commonwealth, 43 Va.App. 593, 600-01 , 601 S.E.2d 1, 4-5 (2004); Rollins, 37 Va.App. at 80 , 554 S.E.2d at 103 ; Snider v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 729, 732 , 496 S.E.2d 665, 666 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Snider v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2005See Cutright v. Commonwealth, 43 Va.App. 593, 600-01 , 601 S.E.2d 1, 4-5 (2004); Rollins, 37 Va.App. at 80 , 554 S.E.2d at 103 ; Snider v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 729, 732 , 496 S.E.2d 665, 666 (1998). 2005See Cutright v. Commonwealth, 43 Va.App. 593, 600-01 , 601 S.E.2d 1, 4-5 (2004); Rollins, 37 Va.App. at 80 , 554 S.E.2d at 103 ; Snider v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 729, 732 , 496 S.E.2d 665, 666 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
Washington v. Com.green1 sentence1995Washington v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 535, 550 , 323 S.E.2d 577, 587 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1111 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kirby v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2003Id. “[That] decision was in conformity with the terms of the statute ... then in force; and it was doubtless to meet the effect of that decision that the statute was subsequently amended by adding the words, ‘unless such statement was made when examined as a witness in his own behalf.’ ” Thaniel, 132 Va. at 802 , 111 S.E. at 261 . 2003Id. "[That] decision was in conformity with the terms of the statute ... then in force; and it was doubtless to meet the effect of that decision that the statute was subsequently amended by adding the words, `unless such statement was made when examined as a witness in his own behalf.'" Thaniel, 132 Va. at 802 , 111 S.E. at 261 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Thaniel v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2003Id. "[That] decision was in conformity with the terms of the statute ... then in force; and it was doubtless to meet the effect of that decision that the statute was subsequently amended by adding the words, `unless such statement was made when examined as a witness in his own behalf.'" Thaniel, 132 Va. at 802 , 111 S.E. at 261 . 2003Id. "[That] decision was in conformity with the terms of the statute ... then in force; and it was doubtless to meet the effect of that decision that the statute was subsequently amended by adding the words, `unless such statement was made when examined as a witness in his own behalf.'" Thaniel, 132 Va. at 802 , 111 S.E. at 261 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Gooch v. Gooch
green
1 sentence2006Nevertheless, in dictum, we stated that the admission of this clause was harmless error because the handwriting of the testator was "complete and entire in itself." Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Baldwin-United Corp. v. Eubanks
green
1 sentence1995Washington v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 535, 550 , 323 S.E.2d 577, 587 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1111 (1985). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Washington v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1995Washington v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 535, 550 , 323 S.E.2d 577, 587 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1111 (1985). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.