Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Illinois v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences2010The majority correctly states, “[w]here it is later established that a third party who consented to a search lacked actual authority to consent, the search may still be upheld if the law enforcement officers reasonably believed that actual authority existed.” However, as the United States Supreme Court pointed out in Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990), the case setting forth the doctrine of apparent authority, the question regarding the validity of a search always hinges on its reasonableness. 1999Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court considered the doctrine of apparent authority in Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 , 110 S.Ct. 2793 , 111 L.Ed.2d 148 (1990). | 1 | 3 |
Estate of Cordero v. Christ Hosp.green2 sentences2009More recently, the Superior Court of New Jersey noted that courts of other jurisdictions recognize hospital liability under the doctrine of apparent authority when the “hospital has established and staffed facilities or departments through which patients receive specialized care from medical professionals with whom they do not have a prior or ongoing relationship-emergency rooms, operating rooms and anesthesiology and radiology departments.” Estate of Cordero v. Christ Hosp., 403 N.J.Super. 306 , 958 A.2d 101, 107 (Ct.App.Div.2008) (emphasis added). *115 TVH raises various arguments in opposit 2009More recently, the Superior Court of New Jersey noted that courts of other jurisdictions recognize hospital liability under the doctrine of apparent authority when the “hospital has established and staffed facilities or departments through which patients receive specialized care from medical professionals with whom they do not have a prior or ongoing relationship-emergency rooms, operating rooms and anesthesiology and radiology departments.” Estate of Cordero v. Christ Hosp., 403 N.J.Super. 306 , 958 A.2d 101, 107 (Ct.App.Div.2008) (emphasis added). *115 TVH raises various arguments in opposit | 1 | 1 |
State v. McCaugheygreen2 sentences1999See Rodríguez, 497 U.S. at 183-88 , 110 S.Ct. at 2798-2801 , 111 L.Ed.2d at 157-61 ; McCaughey, 127 Idaho at 672, 674 , 904 P.2d at 942, 944 . 1999See Rodríguez, 497 U.S. at 183-88 , 110 S.Ct. at 2798-2801 , 111 L.Ed.2d at 157-61 ; McCaughey, 127 Idaho at 672, 674 , 904 P.2d at 942, 944 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Matlockgreen2 sentences1999See id. at 177 n. 14, 94 S.Ct. at 996 n. 14, 39 L.Ed.2d at 253 n. 14. 1999See id. at 177 n. 14, 94 S.Ct. at 996 n. 14, 39 L.Ed.2d at 253 n. 14. | 1 | 1 |
Hilt v. Drapergreen2 sentences1997This is consonant with application of the doctrine in the contract context, where “apparent authority involves an element of reliance on the part of the third party.” Hilt v. Draper, 122 Idaho 612, 618 , 836 P.2d 558, 564 (Ct.App.1992). 1997This is consonant with application of the doctrine in the contract context, where “apparent authority involves an element of reliance on the part of the third party.” Hilt v. Draper, 122 Idaho 612, 618 , 836 P.2d 558, 564 (Ct.App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.green2 sentences1992See Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc., 191 Conn. 120 , 464 A.2d 6 (1983); Kern v. J.L. 1992See Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc., 191 Conn. 120 , 464 A.2d 6 (1983); Kern v. J.L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Healthsouth Treasure Valley Hospital
green
2 sentences2016On the morning of the surgery, Mr. Wainio signed a fourth form titled “Syringa Surgery Center Consent for Operation, Anesthesia or Other Procedures.” It included a statement, “I am awai'e of my physicians’ [sic] ownership in the surgery center and am aware that I may have surgery or treatment performed at any other facility where my surgeon has privileges.” The first element of the doctrine of apparent authority is “conduct by the principal that would lead a person to reasonably believe that another person acts on the principal’s behalf.” Jones, 147 Idaho at 116 , 206 P.3d at 480 . 2016On the morning of the surgery, Mr. Wainio signed a fourth form titled “Syringa Surgery Center Consent for Operation, Anesthesia or Other Procedures.” It included a statement, “I am awai'e of my physicians’ [sic] ownership in the surgery center and am aware that I may have surgery or treatment performed at any other facility where my surgeon has privileges.” The first element of the doctrine of apparent authority is “conduct by the principal that would lead a person to reasonably believe that another person acts on the principal’s behalf.” Jones, 147 Idaho at 116 , 206 P.3d at 480 . | 3 | 2011–2016 |
Bailey v. Ness
green
2 sentences2011Jones v. Health-South Treasure Valley Hosp., 147 Idaho 109 , 206 P.3d 473 (2009) (under doctrine of apparent authority, the tort liability of an independent contractor can be imputed to the principal); Bailey v. Ness, 109 Idaho 495 , 708 P.2d 900 (1985) (under doctrine of apparent authority, the tort liability of another can be imputed to the principal where the other had no contractual relationship of any kind with the principal). 2011Jones v. Health-South Treasure Valley Hosp., 147 Idaho 109 , 206 P.3d 473 (2009) (under doctrine of apparent authority, the tort liability of an independent contractor can be imputed to the principal); Bailey v. Ness, 109 Idaho 495 , 708 P.2d 900 (1985) (under doctrine of apparent authority, the tort liability of another can be imputed to the principal where the other had no contractual relationship of any kind with the principal). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Williams v. St. Claire Medical Center
green
1 sentence2009Id. at 596 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
LANDVIK BY LANDVIK v. Herbert
green
1 sentence2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Jackson v. Righter
green
1 sentence1997It is stated, for example, in Jackson v. Righter, 891 P.2d at 1392 : “To be vicariously liable for the acts of an employee under a theory of apparent authority, an employer must conduct itself in such a way as to clothe its employee with apparent authority to perform the torts committed and there must be reasonable reliance on that apparent authority on the *60 part of the injured party.” (Emphasis added.) This reliance requirement precluded recovery by the plaintiff in Wilson v. Good Humor Corp., 757 F.2d 1293 (D.C.Cir.1985), a wrongful death action. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
John Scowcroft & Sons Co. v. Roselle
green
2 sentences1997See Bailey, supra; John Scowcroft & Sons Co. v. Roselle, 77 Idaho 142 , 289 P.2d 621 (1955); Tri-Circle, supra. Neither this Court nor the Idaho Supreme Court has applied the doctrine of apparent authority to a claim that a principal is liable for injuries resulting from the agent’s tortious conduct. 1997See Bailey, supra; John Scowcroft & Sons Co. v. Roselle, 77 Idaho 142 , 289 P.2d 621 (1955); Tri-Circle, supra. Neither this Court nor the Idaho Supreme Court has applied the doctrine of apparent authority to a claim that a principal is liable for injuries resulting from the agent’s tortious conduct. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Willis E. Wilson, Rep., Estate of Tomikia Wilson v. Good Humor Corporation and David A. Williams
green
1 sentence1997It is stated, for example, in Jackson v. Righter, 891 P.2d at 1392 : “To be vicariously liable for the acts of an employee under a theory of apparent authority, an employer must conduct itself in such a way as to clothe its employee with apparent authority to perform the torts committed and there must be reasonable reliance on that apparent authority on the *60 part of the injured party.” (Emphasis added.) This reliance requirement precluded recovery by the plaintiff in Wilson v. Good Humor Corp., 757 F.2d 1293 (D.C.Cir.1985), a wrongful death action. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.