Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2016See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 600 F.3d 678, 686 (6th Cir.2010); United States v. Snype, 441 F.3d 119, 136-37 (2d Cir.2006); United States v. Waller, 426 F.3d 838, 847-49 (6th Cir.2005); United States v. Melgar, 227 F.3d 1038, 1041-42 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 969 F.2d 861, 865-66 (10th Cir.1992). 2016See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 600 F.3d 678, 685 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Snype, 441 F.3d 119 , 136–37 (2d Cir. 2006); United States v. Waller, 426 F.3d 838 , 847–49 (6th Cir. 2005); United States v. Melgar, 227 F.3d 1038 , 1041–42 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861 , 865–66 (10th Cir. 1992). 15 A. Circuits Concluding Officers Have a Duty to Inquire Before Searching a Closed Container if a Reasonable Officer Would Conclude the Authority of the Person Who Consented to a Premises Search is Ambiguous. | 3 | 3 |
United States v. Zoila Melgargreen2 sentences2016Id. at 1040–41. 23 The Seventh Circuit acknowledged the lack of binding authority concerning the proper application of the apparent-authority doctrine to closed-container searches. 2016Id. at 1040–41. 22 The Seventh Circuit acknowledged the lack of binding authority concerning the proper application of the apparent-authority doctrine to closed-container searches. | 3 | 3 |
City of Norwalk v. Connecticut State Board of Labor Relationsgreen2 sentences2016See, e.g., City of Norwalk v. Conn. State Bd. of Labor Relations, 206 Conn. 449 , 538 A.2d 694, 697 (1988) (holding that a municipality may not be bound to an agreement under apparent authority because "[ejvery person who deals with [a municipal corporation] is bound to know the extent of its authority and the limitations of its powers” (quoting John J. 2016See, e.g., City of Norwalk v. Conn. State Bd. of Labor Relations, 206 Conn. 449 , 538 A.2d 694, 697 (1988) (holding that a municipality may not be bound to an agreement under apparent authority because "[ejvery person who deals with [a municipal corporation] is bound to know the extent of its authority and the limitations of its powers” (quoting John J. | 2 | 2 |
Claxton Enterprise v. Evans County Board of Commissionersgreen2 sentences2016See 549 S.E.2d at 835 (“Because this meeting occurred between the county administrator and the commissioners individually, 5The majority’s agency theory not only is at odds with the nondelegation principle noted in Bunger but also conflicts with well-established authority that the apparent authority doctrine cannot be used against a local government entity or official. 2016See 549 S.E.2d at 835 (“Because this meeting occurred between the county administrator and the commissioners individually, 5The majority’s agency theory not only is at odds with the nondelegation principle noted in Bunger but also conflicts with well-established authority that the apparent authority doctrine cannot be used against a local government entity or official. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Frederick Alonzo Wallergreen2 sentences2016See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 600 F.3d 678, 686 (6th Cir.2010); United States v. Snype, 441 F.3d 119, 136-37 (2d Cir.2006); United States v. Waller, 426 F.3d 838, 847-49 (6th Cir.2005); United States v. Melgar, 227 F.3d 1038, 1041-42 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 969 F.2d 861, 865-66 (10th Cir.1992). 2016See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 600 F.3d 678, 685 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Snype, 441 F.3d 119 , 136–37 (2d Cir. 2006); United States v. Waller, 426 F.3d 838 , 847–49 (6th Cir. 2005); United States v. Melgar, 227 F.3d 1038 , 1041–42 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861 , 865–66 (10th Cir. 1992). 15 A. Circuits Concluding Officers Have a Duty to Inquire Before Searching a Closed Container if a Reasonable Officer Would Conclude the Authority of the Person Who Consented to a Premises Search is Ambiguous. | 1 | 3 |
United States v. Vernon Snype, Marisa Hicksgreen2 sentences2016See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 600 F.3d 678, 686 (6th Cir.2010); United States v. Snype, 441 F.3d 119, 136-37 (2d Cir.2006); United States v. Waller, 426 F.3d 838, 847-49 (6th Cir.2005); United States v. Melgar, 227 F.3d 1038, 1041-42 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 969 F.2d 861, 865-66 (10th Cir.1992). 2016See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 600 F.3d 678, 685 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Snype, 441 F.3d 119 , 136–37 (2d Cir. 2006); United States v. Waller, 426 F.3d 838 , 847–49 (6th Cir. 2005); United States v. Melgar, 227 F.3d 1038 , 1041–42 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861 , 865–66 (10th Cir. 1992). 15 A. Circuits Concluding Officers Have a Duty to Inquire Before Searching a Closed Container if a Reasonable Officer Would Conclude the Authority of the Person Who Consented to a Premises Search is Ambiguous. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Abel Gilberto Salinas-Cano
green
2 sentences2016Id. at 865 . 2016See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 600 F.3d 678, 685 (6th Cir. 2010); United States v. Snype, 441 F.3d 119 , 136–37 (2d Cir. 2006); United States v. Waller, 426 F.3d 838 , 847–49 (6th Cir. 2005); United States v. Melgar, 227 F.3d 1038 , 1041–42 (7th Cir. 2000); United States v. Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861 , 865–66 (10th Cir. 1992). 15 A. Circuits Concluding Officers Have a Duty to Inquire Before Searching a Closed Container if a Reasonable Officer Would Conclude the Authority of the Person Who Consented to a Premises Search is Ambiguous. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.