9 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tibbs v. City of Sandpointgreen2 sentences2002In McCuskey , this Court granted attorneys fees because “[t]his Court [had] clearly established the time when a cause of action accrues in an inverse condemnation claim in Tibbs [v. City of Sandpoint, 100 Idaho 667, 670 , 603 P.2d 1001, 1004 (1979)].” Id. at 218, 912 P.2d at 105 . 2002In McCuskey , this Court granted attorneys fees because “[t]his Court [had] clearly established the time when a cause of action accrues in an inverse condemnation claim in Tibbs [v. City of Sandpoint, 100 Idaho 667, 670 , 603 P.2d 1001, 1004 (1979)].” Id. at 218, 912 P.2d at 105 . | 2 | 2 |
Reisenauer v. State, Dept. of Highwaysgreen2 sentences2025“An inverse condemnation case is a civil action predicated upon our Idaho constitution.” Reisenauer v. State, Dep’t of Highways, 120 Idaho 36, 39 , 813 P.2d 375, 378 (Ct. App. 1991). 2025“An inverse condemnation case is a civil action predicated upon our Idaho constitution.” Reisenauer v. State, Dep’t of Highways, 120 Idaho 36, 39 , 813 P.2d 375, 378 (Ct. App. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
Covington v. Jefferson Countygreen2 sentences2020A proper inverse condemnation claim must be: “(1) instituted by a property owner who (2) asserts that his property, or some interest therein, has been invaded or appropriated (3) to the extent of a taking, (4) but without due process of law, and (5) without payment of just compensation.” Covington v. Jefferson Cnty., 137 Idaho 777, 780 , 53 P.3d 828, 831 (2002). 2020A proper inverse condemnation claim must be: “(1) instituted by a property owner who (2) asserts that his property, or some interest therein, has been invaded or appropriated (3) to the extent of a taking, (4) but without due process of law, and (5) without payment of just compensation.” Covington v. Jefferson Cnty., 137 Idaho 777, 780 , 53 P.3d 828, 831 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.green2 sentences2020In holding that there was no reliance, the district court failed to provide the Day family the benefit of “all reasonable inferences which can be made from the record . . . .” G & M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co., 119 Idaho 514, 517 , 808 P.2d 851, 854 (1991). 2020In holding that there was no reliance, the district court failed to provide the Day family the benefit of “all reasonable inferences which can be made from the record . . . .” G & M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co., 119 Idaho 514, 517 , 808 P.2d 851, 854 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4green2 sentences2009No. 4, 139 Idaho 140, 143 , 75 P.3d 194, 197 (2003). 2009No. 4, 139 Idaho 140, 143 , 75 P.3d 194, 197 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Dickinsongreen2 sentences2003See U.S. v. Dickinson, 331 U.S. 745 , 67 S.Ct. 1382 , 91 L.Ed. 1789 (1947). 2003See U.S. v. Dickinson, 331 U.S. 745 , 67 S.Ct. 1382 , 91 L.Ed. 1789 (1947). | 1 | 1 |
Wadsworth v. Department of Transp.green2 sentences2003Wadsworth v. Dep't. of Transp., 128 Idaho 439, 441-42 , 915 P.2d 1, 3-4 (1996) (citing McCuskey v. Canyon County Comm'rs, 128 Idaho 213 , 912 P.2d 100 (1996)). 2003Wadsworth v. Dep't. of Transp., 128 Idaho 439, 441-42 , 915 P.2d 1, 3-4 (1996) (citing McCuskey v. Canyon County Comm'rs, 128 Idaho 213 , 912 P.2d 100 (1996)). | 1 | 1 |
Intermountain West, Inc. v. Boise Citygreen2 sentences2002The principle was also echoed in Intermountain West v. Boise City, 111 Idaho 878, 879 , 728 P.2d 767, 768 (1986). 2002The principle was also echoed in Intermountain West v. Boise City, 111 Idaho 878, 879 , 728 P.2d 767, 768 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
World Wide Lease, Inc. v. Woodworthgreen1 sentence1996Id. at 880, 728 P.2d at 769 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCuskey v. Canyon County Commissioners
green
2 sentences2003This analysis should not be taken as a reversal of McCuskey where this Court refused to apply Farber's project completion rule to determine when an inverse condemnation claim accrues. 128 Idaho at 218, 912 P.2d at 105 . 2003This analysis should not be taken as a-reversal of McCuskey where this Court refused to apply Father’s project completion rule to determine when an inverse condemnation claim accrues. 128 Idaho at 218, 912 P.2d at 105 . | 2 | 2002–2003 |
State Ex Rel. Symms v. Nelson Sand & Gravel, Inc.
green
2 sentences2025Id. at 582–83, 468 P.2d at 314– 15. 2025Id. at 582–83, 468 P.2d at 314– 15. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
KMST, LLC. v. County of Ada
green
2 sentences2013There, the Court *495 was considering a developer’s inverse condemnation claim, where the developer sought to recover the cost of constructing a street along the side of its development, even though the developer had initially proposed that it be responsible for such construction. 138 Idaho at 579 , 67 P.3d at 58 . 2013There, the Court *495 was considering a developer’s inverse condemnation claim, where the developer sought to recover the cost of constructing a street along the side of its development, even though the developer had initially proposed that it be responsible for such construction. 138 Idaho at 579 , 67 P.3d at 58 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Ackerman v. Port of Seattle
red
1 sentence1996The Supreme Court of Washington later declared that the rule from Ackerman, 348 P.2d 664 , is “not quite precise since the acquisition by prescription is the result of the running of the statute of limitations.” Highline School Dist. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles
green
2 sentences1996First English, 482 U.S. at 316 , 107 S.Ct. at 2386 . 1996First English, 482 U.S. at 316 , 107 S.Ct. at 2386 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Powell v. McKelvey
green
2 sentences1993In Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 (1935), the plaintiffs were the owners of property abutting Eleventh Avenue South in Nampa, Idaho. 1993In Powell v. McKelvey, 56 Idaho 291 , 53 P.2d 626 (1935), the plaintiffs were the owners of property abutting Eleventh Avenue South in Nampa, Idaho. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.