6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Akers v. City of Oak Grovegreen1 sentence2008See Akers v. City of Oak Grove, 246 S.W.3d 916 (Mo. banc, 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Crede v. City of Oak Grovegreen1 sentence2008The law is well-settled that “any damage suffered as a result of [a] taking ... would have been suffered by the owner at the time the damage became ascertainable!.] ... [T]he damage claim based on inverse condemnation [does] not pass to subsequent grantees of the land.” Crede v. City of Oak Grove, 979 S.W.2d 529, 534 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Ressel v. Scott Countygreen1 sentence2005See Ressel v. Scott County, 927 S.W.2d 518, 520 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Agins v. City of Tiburonred2 sentences1990Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 260 , 100 S.Ct. 2138, 2141 , 65 L.Ed.2d 106, 112 (1980). 1990Agins v. City of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255, 260 , 100 S.Ct. 2138, 2141 , 65 L.Ed.2d 106, 112 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Basham v. City of Cuba
green
2 sentences2008In Basham v. City of Cuba, 257 S.W.3d 650 (Mo.App., 2008), this Court noted that an inverse condemnation claim arising from the operation of a city sewage system is grounded in the law of nuisance. 2008Id. at *282 652. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
green
1 sentence2004In Count II, Ward Builders sought to permanently enjoin the City from operating the lighting system at the park. *647 In response, the City filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that, “where a governmental entity is involved, what might be a nuisance claim against a private entity is an inverse condemnation claim against the governmental entity.” 1 Following Ward Builders’ response to the City’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered its “Judgment” dismissing Ward Builders’ petition, as a matter of law, based on its interpretation of Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highw | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Byrom v. Little Blue Valley Sewer District
green
2 sentences2004In Count II, Ward Builders sought to permanently enjoin the City from operating the lighting system at the park. *647 In response, the City filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that, “where a governmental entity is involved, what might be a nuisance claim against a private entity is an inverse condemnation claim against the governmental entity.” 1 Following Ward Builders’ response to the City’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered its “Judgment” dismissing Ward Builders’ petition, as a matter of law, based on its interpretation of Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highw 2004Id. at 575 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.